Livefyre Profile

Activity Stream

HB 87 is also interesting:(a) An individual may engage in an occupation not prohibited by law without being subject to a state agency rule, policy, or practice that regulates the occupation if the rule, policy, or practice is:              (1)  substantially burdensome; and              (2)  unnecessary to fulfill the purpose and intent of the statute authorizing the regulation of the occupation.        (b)  A state agency rule, policy, or practice may substantially burden an individual's right to engage in an occupation only if the agency demonstrates that the rule, policy, or practice is necessary to fulfill the purpose and intent of the statute authorizing the regulation of the occupation.        Sec. 94.003.  DEFENSE AND RELIEF. (a)  An individual may assert as a defense in any administrative or judicial proceeding to enforce a state agency rule, policy, or practice that the standard required by Section 94.002(b) has not been met.        (b)  An individual may bring an action for declaratory judgment or injunctive or other equitable relief for a violation of Section 94.002.        (c)  An individual who brings an action or asserts a defense under this section must show by a preponderance of the evidence that the state agency rule, policy, or practice substantially burdens the individual's right to engage in an occupation not prohibited by law. 

2 years, 1 month ago on Will Texas Nullify Both NDAA and TSA?

Reply