Bio not provided
@HopeVarnedoe @Go_Kyle Well if "several people" on the internet agree with you, then by all means, you must be right!
2 months, 2 weeks ago on Conversation @ http://www.motorsport.com/nascar-cup/news/tony-stewart-press-conference-it-s-been-hard-for-me-to-function/
@GrowUpWouldYa @MichaelBondurant You chiding someone else for making assumptions is the height of hypocrisy.
@BuckyBradK Wow, you are an amazing fiction writer. You really think anyone would be so tone deaf and obtuse as to have their sponsor's banners blazing at a press conference about a young man being killed? It's not some conspiracy, or that all the sponsors aren't behind Stewart. It simply isn't appropriate under the circumstances. I can't believe the hatred you carry in your heart. Must be difficult to go through life with that massive chip on your shoulder. And you're tying it in with the "Liberals in Washington?" Wow dude, just wow. What a twisted world you inhabit.
@GrowUpWouldYa @Casrekoli You don't even understand what you're watching. Stewart had position going into that turn. Ward essentially wrecked himself. Ward was the one who should have backed off, because Stewart had the track position. Do you even know anything about racing? I'm not the world's expert, but I know that much.
@GrowUpWouldYa @MichaelBondurant That's not even true that Stewart wrecked him. Stewart had track position and Ward chose to fight him for it instead of backing off. A typical move a young and inexperienced driver would make. A more experienced driver would have simply eased off. Honestly why would Stewart even be bothered by it? He didn't get wrecked. That's basic racing, nothing out of the ordinary or beneath the pale. I wasn't there, but I don't think Stewart even knew Ward was out of the car and on the track until he came around the turn. The 45 looked like it was blocking his view, and no one expects a driver to be out of his car and on the track. There aren't a dozen spotters there like in NASCAR races. You guys assume so much in a negative way. Isn't it most likely it was simply a terrible accident?
@JohnCharlesReed Your opinion and $5 will get me a cup of overpriced coffee.
@HopeVarnedoe @Casrekoli @I_Am_Squirrel Amazing that a grand jury who reviewed ALL of the relevant information arrived at a 100% different conclusion than you. I guess they were all "drinking the Tony Stewart cool-aide (sic)" too?
It's published on a website that is entirely dedicated to satire. The biography of the author clearly states that he is a stand up comic. Look at all the other article titles. Look at the "about us" section where it clearly says that nothing on the site is factual. How much do you need to have your hand held to figure this stuff out? For every satirical piece does the author need to start the article with a disclaimer stating that the piece is not real? That sort of ruins what satire is about. It's not the fault of the publisher that some ignoramus didn't have enough sense to decipher a very obvious joke and decided to disseminate it as truth. My goodness. If you can't figure out that this is satire, God help you. I can't imagine what it is like for you to try and navigate the very complex media landscape out there. Why don't you just realize you've been had and have a laugh? It might do you some good.
2 years, 1 month ago on Military Absentee Ballots Delivered One Day Late, Would Have Swung Election For Romney
No man, you're not getting it. This site is not real. It is a joke site. There may very well be real honest to God examples of military votes being discounted, but this isn't one of them. You are defending the authenticity of a story that the publishers go out of their way to tell you is not based on truth. Jeez - if you will believe a story that is published on a joke site and that the publishers are clearly telling you is not based on any facts at all, what won't you believe? Think about that. And since when is the stock market the sane arbiter in the room? Get real.
It's not "the same story." It's a different story based on loosely the same topic. The difference is that the Examiner story is actually a news story, while the Duffel Bag story is a joke. When you respond to a joke story as if it were a news story, you sort of make yourself look like a fool.
Not a malcontent - this is a website dedicated to satire regarding the military. It is for people in the military to laugh at. Grow a sense of humor. Trying times require it.
Did you even bother to read the article? It's clearly a joke. It doesn't say anything about Obama attempting to suppress the military vote, it talks about the incompetency of the military mail system. It talks about the soldiers being completely used to this kind of bureaucratic bumbling. This is insider humor for people in the military. I'm thinking you just saw the headline and ran with it, instead of bothering to investigate the source, or even to read the very brief, obviously intended to be taken as humor, article. My goodness. There are real articles about votes being lost, etc. But this is not one of them.
Okay, I sort of get your point about Chris Matthews - but on the other hand, if you do believe a website that clearly states nothing they publish is based on truth, then I think you've got some serious problems.
I asked a Navy SEAL and he looked over the site, then told me: "This site's satire idiot." He pointed me to the "about us" section, and then pointed out that all the other articles on the site were obviously jokes too.
Whether or not Snopes is "in Obama's pocket" has nothing to do with this site being entirely 100% satirical. It's not a news site. It's, for lack of a better word, a joke site. Look up "satire." It's like Stephen Colbert, who FYI is not really a conservative pundit, in case you thought he was. Sorry.
Did you know that gullible isn't in the dictionary?
You know where she got that shit about the red states and blue states? Stephen Colbert. He ran a joke about that last night. I swear these people don't understand what satire is. They believe everything they read. They think Colbert is a real right-winger and not someone making fun of right-wingers. It's insane.