Daryl Taylor
- 406 comments
- 834 likes given
- 880 likes received
Bio not provided
Tango,
To your point, I was online looking for a decent med kit for my car and the parental units; trying to remember all that was in the one I carried in country.
Any recommendations/preference on kits out there?
@Virginstateofmind LOL, precisely. More like 14 hours ago.
Didn't see SleazyWeasel's story below. What he said.
Now when that command is followed by, "Present, Arms!"what am I supposed to do again?
Lets see now. 'This is my rifle, this is my gun...'
@Tango9 @DieHardDeuce Prepatory command and command of execution.
Why waste a JDAM? All that tinderbox needed was a sparkler or a dirty look from Nancy Pelosi and *poof*
Excellent article. Sums up how I've been feeling all week when I first heard about the crap infowars was selling. Even though I was initially hoping for real whores, outing conspiracy dealers is the next best thing.
Ok, before I even start reading:
At first, I thought the title said, "Attention: Whores and Conspiracy Theorists!" I should have known that was an odd title for a SOFREP article.
Now back to reading...
@LauraWalkerKC @Tango9 @IS1FiveO Haha. @TSpeedbump and TFlashbang!
Yep, you're second paragraph is essentially the point I was making. Wasnt advocating going down that road, just pointing to the sign in that direction. Trying to see the line between American Jihadist captured here and the rights he's gets to pursue, versus American jihadist in Yemen that catches a Hellfire with his bunghole with no due process.
Hang 'em by the nuts upside down in pirana infested waters sure, but what's the difference in paths on getting to that point, and how does that apply to Hassan, or ELF torching homes, or any other domestic terrorist. Or does imminent threat only apply to Jihadis?
Apologies if this is mentioned down below, didn't have time to read all of the comments today.
I understand and agree with the point of taking terrorism cases out of the Federal criminal system and handing them over to the skull fuckers and finger nail pull... I mean military tribuals and CIA interrogators. Full agreement there.
I think the question that arises is that do American citizens that commit acts of terror abdicate their rights under the Constitution? Is that only for terrorists that identify with a foreign influenced cause, or domestic terrorists too? If the latter, who defines a domestic act of terror? I see it as an attack on civilian or government entities to make a political or geopolitical statement. But will a 9th Circuit court judge see it the same way?
That, I think, is a slope with even more grease.
Why my ROTC instructors never let me conduct PT after once:
"Close ranks, march!"
"First squad, THE BEND N' REAAACH!"
"Second squad, THE HIP RO-TA-SHUUUUN!"
"...And GYRATE!!!"
Only seen it sourced here, but apparently, the Boston guys got their gunpower by breaking down fireworks mortars:
http://gma.yahoo.com/boston-bombs-likely-built-fireworks-132131170--abc-news-topstories.html
The who would be Alex "Deep Throat" Jones. The why is probably a need for attention/validation and his perscription consipracy glasses that he views the world through.
I believe it was said that they were Army National Guard CST performing a WMD detection mission
Well of course they did. They probably don't want a late night visit from a three sided geometric group, or angry rabid aquatic mammals, or the emotionally depressed division that works for the agency. Any terroist group with any sense would probably deny involvement most ricky tick.
@LauraWalkerKC @DieHardDeuce Agreed, but I'm not a pro, just open minded. This was the first article where I saw the theory validated.
Game on, then.
@LauraWalkerKC @DieHardDeuce Thanks, figured you'd have insight, LW. I always come to SOFREP first.