Livefyre Profile

Activity Stream

@Tionico @TedRWeiland I'm pleased to hear you're not a Mormon.


Of course you're contract to sell your house is NOT morally neutral. If, unlike the Constitution, it's drawn up with no Biblically errant components, it's Biblically compatible. If, like the Constitution, it's rife with Biblically hostile components, it's Biblically incompatible.



1 week, 1 day ago on We have returned to ground zero for liberty; fix this or else

Reply

@Tionico @TedRWeiland So you DO believe it's a morally neutral document--despite the fact there is hardly an Article or Amendment that's not hostile to Yahweh's sovereignty and morality!?!


You've never answered my question: Are you a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (commonly known as the Mormon church)?

1 week, 1 day ago on We have returned to ground zero for liberty; fix this or else

Reply

@Tionico @TedRWeiland You wrote "The issue is not one of a failure of the Constitution...."

What!?! 

You know as well as I that there are no moral vacuums in life. The Constitution is a legislative instrument and it is either based upon and promotes Yahweh's sovereignty and His perfect law as the standard for society or it's opposed to both. It's one or the other. 

Consequently, easy enough to find out which it is: Examine the Constitution line by line, Article by Article, and Amendment by Amendment by Yahweh's immutable moral standard as codified in His commandments, statutes, and judgments and see which it is. When this is actually done, the Constitution falls flat on its face as Biblically compatible document. In fact, there is hardly an Article or Amendment which is not antithetical, if not seditious to Yahweh's sovereignty and morality.


For evidence, see free online book "Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective," in which every Article and Amendment is examined by the Bible, at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/blvc-index.html.

1 week, 2 days ago on We have returned to ground zero for liberty; fix this or else

Reply

@Tionico @TedRWeiland Once again, you demonstrate that idols die hard.


The late 1700 State Constitutions were a far cry from the 1600 Constitutions. Albeit better than the Federal Constitution, they were already rife with Enlightenment concepts. Returning to either of these accomplishes nothing.


Time to scurry as fast as you can from what might be described as Mt. Carmel Christianity. See blog Article "Today's Mt. Carmel Christianity" at http://www.constitutionmythbusters.org/todays-mount-carmel-christians/, followed by "Could You be a Disciple of Baal and Not Know It?"

1 week, 2 days ago on We have returned to ground zero for liberty; fix this or else

Reply

@Mark On our hearts and minds to be put into practice with our hands and feet. Why else would Yahweh put it on our hearts and minds?


“The law sends us to the gospel for our justification; the gospel sends us to the law to frame our way of life.” Puritan minister Samuel Bolton (1606-1654)

You have failed to address the list of New Testament passages provided you. Instead of harmonizing what the New Testament declares about Yahweh's moral law as it applies under the New Covenant, your doctrine pits Scripture against Scripture.

1 week, 2 days ago on We have returned to ground zero for liberty; fix this or else

Reply

@Mark thanks for replying. I'm not sure what to make of your statement: "the law has past" and a country's law "must be based on Yahweh's perfect law." You seem to contradict yourself.


We are certainly neither under the law nor justified by the law, but Yahweh's immutable moral law (for us as individual and a society) certainly has not been done away, as regrettably so many modern Christians have been led to believe.

In addition to the one Chuck Michaelis shared with you, let me provide you some additional New Testament passages for your consideration:


  • “…truth [is] in the law.” (Romans 2:20)

    “…by the law is the knowledge of sin.” (Romans 3:20)

  • “Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.” (Romans 3:31)

  • “Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.” (Romans 7:12)

  • “For we know that the law is spiritual….” (Romans 7:14)

  • “That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.” (Romans 8:4)

  • “Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.” (Romans 8:7)

  • “Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but the keeping of the commandments of God.” (1 Corinthians 7:19)

  • “But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully.” (1 Timothy 1:8)

  • “For this is the [New] covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts….” (Hebrews 8:10)

  • “And hereby we do know that we know him, if we keep his commandments.” (1 John 2:3)

  • “Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.” (1 John 3:4)

  • “By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God, and keep his commandments.” (1 John 5:2)

  • “For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous.” (1 John 5:3)

  • “And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.” (Revelation 12:17)

  • “Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.” (Revelation 14:12)

  • “Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.” (Revelation 22:14)

     Summed up:  Puritan minister Samuel Bolton (1606-1654) wrote, “The law sends us to the gospel for our justification; the gospel sends us to the law to frame our way of life.”

    For more, see free online book "Law and Kingdom: Their Relevance Under the New Covenant" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/law-kingdomFrame.html.


1 week, 2 days ago on We have returned to ground zero for liberty; fix this or else

Reply

Joel McDurmon: "Dear friends, you are watching Washington politicians wrangle about the exigencies of tyranny under the banner of the land of the free, and meanwhile the real castle walls of freedom have already crumbled and fallen around you."

I've said it this way: While trying to save the Republic, Christian have but lost the kingdom to the antichrists and non-Christians.

Unless, I missed it, case in point: this article.

The "REAL castle walls of freedom" were officially and nationally assailed when the 1700 founders replaced the 1600 governments of, by, and for God, based upon His immutable law of liberty (Psalm 19:7-11, 119:44-45, James 2:12) for their own humanistic government of, by, and for the people, based upon capricious Enlightenment and Masonic concepts (Judges 21:25, Matthew 15:6-9, etc.)


For more regarding these two antipodal governments, see online Chapter 3 "The Preamble: WE THE PEOPLE vs. YAHWEH" of "Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/biblelaw-constitutionalism-pt3.html.

1 week, 2 days ago on We have returned to ground zero for liberty; fix this or else

Reply

@RaymondRoss @Richard Frank @TedRWeiland Hangs, not abolished. In other words, love of Yahweh and our fellow man rather than for justification (as under the Mosaic Covenant) is our motivation for keeping the Ten Commandments and their respective statutes and judgments under the New Covenant. In other words, we're no longer under the law but now empowered by Yahweh's Spirit to keep what was otherwise impossible in the flesh:

"For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth. (Romans 10:4)


Note, Christ is the end of the law period (as you would have it), but the end of the law FOR RIGHTEOUSNESS (or justification, as in Deuteronomy 6:25).


And don't overlook that Paul, the author of Romans 10:4, is also the author of the following passages:

  • "Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.” (Romans 3:31)

  • “Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.” (Romans 7:12)

  • “For we know that the law is spiritual….” (Romans 7:14)

  • “That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.” (Romans 8:4)

  • “Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.” (Romans 8:7)

  • “Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but the keeping of the commandments of God.” (1 Corinthians 7:19)

  • “But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully.” (1 Timothy 1:8)



  • 2 weeks, 4 days ago on What Would Jesus Do? Not what this liberal says He would do

    Reply

    @RaymondRoss @GaryLincoln @Richard Frank @TedRWeiland Raymond, everyone here, I'm sure, agrees that righteousness does NOT come by keeping the law. Righteousness, justification, forgiveness of sins, salvation is bestowed to us only by means of the blood-atoning sacrifice and resurrection of Christ.

    Everyone here, I'm sure, accepts and praises God for Galatians 2:21 and the other Scriptures you've employed in this debate.. The problem is, it would seem, you don't accept the New Testament list of Scriptures on the law that I supplied you as it pertains to how we're to conduct our lives as individuals and as a society. Thus, my reason for saying your theology is one based upon pitting Scripture against Scripture.


    If you'll permit me, I would like to recommend to you again "Law and Kingdom: Their Relevance Under the New Covenant" in which the New Testament Scriptures on the law are harmonized rather the pitted against each other. 

    You can find a free online copy at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/law-kingdomFrame.html. Or, if you would like the book itself, I would be pleased to send you (or anyone else here) a complimentary copy. Use our contact button on our website to provide me with your name and address and I'll get a copy right out to you.


    2 weeks, 5 days ago on What Would Jesus Do? Not what this liberal says He would do

    Reply

    @AmyAkins @TedRWeiland I'm pleased to hear you claim Christ as your Savior. 


    No one is angry here that I can tell. Just merely a case of Proverbs 27:17, honing our understanding and challenging others to do the same.


    That said, you're initial remark seems to have been of the caliber of what sickens you. It had a tone of condemnation, so much so that one would think it was coming from a non-Christian paradigm and, unlike the other posts, added nothing to the Bible study going on betwixt men.


    Just something to think about.

    2 weeks, 6 days ago on What Would Jesus Do? Not what this liberal says He would do

    Reply

    @RaymondRoss @TedRWeiland Your forgiveness is not determined by what you think about Yahweh's salvation but upon what Yahweh thinks about your salvation. Among a number of other passages (see my list previously provided you), the following testify against your pitting-Scripture-against-Scripture theology:


    "Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law." (Romans 3;31)


    "For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ." (Jude 1:4)

    2 weeks, 6 days ago on What Would Jesus Do? Not what this liberal says He would do

    Reply

    @Markurious @GaryLincoln Check out "WWJD? Are You SURE You Want to Know?" Part 1, at http://www.constitutionmythbusters.org/wwjd-are-you-sure-you-want-to-know-pt-1/, in which I deal with this very question.

    2 weeks, 6 days ago on What Would Jesus Do? Not what this liberal says He would do

    Reply

    @AmyAkins Quit trying to crash our party. We're having fun! If you're not a Christian, you'll never understand. It's called ironing sharpening iron. I hope you'll be able to join in some day.


    "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." (John 14:6)

    " Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved." (Acts 4:12)

    2 weeks, 6 days ago on What Would Jesus Do? Not what this liberal says He would do

    Reply

    @GaryLincoln @DarrenCamp1 Not to toot my horn. But, you might find "Law and Kingdom: Their Relevance Under the New Covenant" helpful. You can find it online at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/law-kingdomFrame.html.


    You will also find a series of ten booklets on each of the Ten Commandments and their respective statutes, and judgments on our Online Books page, as well.

    2 weeks, 6 days ago on Jefferson’s law of castration and maiming: the tyranny of humanistic law

    Reply

    @RaymondRoss @Richard Frank @TedRWeiland Raymond, tragically, you've actually condemned yourself as as enemy of Christ by your antinomian tirade here, as perfectly described by Jude:


    "For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness,* and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ." (Jude 1:4)


    *NASB translates "lasciviousness" as "licentiousness." If you have access to an 1828 Webster's Dictionary, look up Webster's definition.

    "Do we then make void the law through faith [or grace]? God forbid: yea, we establish the law." (Romans 3:31)


    Puritan minister Samuel Bolton (1606-1654) wrote, “The law sends us to the gospel for our justification; the gospel sends us to the law to frame our way of life.”

    3 weeks ago on What Would Jesus Do? Not what this liberal says He would do

    Reply

    @DJustice @TedRWeiland Let's say, you are kidnapped and held hostage for five years and are then escape. Later the kidnapper is identified and apprehended: Are you saying that he should not be prosecuted under Exodus 21:16?


    The phrase "be found in his hand" refers to someone alive as juxtaposed to a person kidnapped who has either been murdered or sold.

    3 weeks ago on Jefferson’s law of castration and maiming: the tyranny of humanistic law

    Reply

    @DJustice @waffleater A kidnapping involves an abduction in which the one abducted is held hostage against her (or his) will, regardless the location or for how long. Ask any woman who's been raped whether she was kidnapped or not.

    3 weeks ago on Jefferson’s law of castration and maiming: the tyranny of humanistic law

    Reply

    @RaymondRoss @TedRWeiland Amen to these Scriptures, but not to your interpretation of the ones I've provided. You've merely pitted Scripture against Scripture and do not understand what Paul meant by "under law" vs. "under grace."


    For how these Scriptures are properly harmonized, see free online book "Law and Kingdom: Their Relevance Under the New Covenant" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/law-kingdomFrame.html

    Puritan minister Samuel Bolton (1606-1654) shows the Scriptural balance: “The law sends us to the gospel for our justification; the gospel sends us to the law to frame our way of life.”

    3 weeks ago on What Would Jesus Do? Not what this liberal says He would do

    Reply

    @waffleater @TedRWeiland @vRico Is it true that kidnapping is a capital crime? Is true that rape involves a kidnapping? Then rape is a capital crime regardless who's its victim.  This would likewise apply to pedophiles.


    I don't suppose to know the mind of the Lord in Deuteronomy 22:25-27 and his reason in that instance for choosing to include the word "engaged." But I do not know that His choice in doing so doesn't negate the kidnapping/rape connection.

    3 weeks ago on Jefferson’s law of castration and maiming: the tyranny of humanistic law

    Reply

    @waffleater @vRico Not true! Because every rape involves a kidnapping and Exodus 21:16 makes kidnapping a capital crime, rape of anyone's woman (fiance, wife, or daughter) is punishable by death.

    3 weeks, 1 day ago on Jefferson’s law of castration and maiming: the tyranny of humanistic law

    Reply

    @MM Sorry, your opinions do not trump Yahweh's immutable moral law in Leviticus 20:13.

    3 weeks, 1 day ago on Jefferson’s law of castration and maiming: the tyranny of humanistic law

    Reply

    @RaymondRoss 

    • “For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.” (Mathew 5:18)

    • “Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.” (Matthew 5:19)

    • “Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? And in thy name have cast out devils? And in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity [anomian – lawlessness].” (Matthew 7:21-23)

    • “…truth [is] in the law.” (Romans 2:20)

    • “…by the law is the knowledge of sin.” (Romans 3:20)

    • “Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.” (Romans 3:31)

    • “Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.” (Romans 7:12)

    • “For we know that the law is spiritual….” (Romans 7:14)

    • “That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.” (Romans 8:4)

    • “Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.” (Romans 8:7)

    • “Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but the keeping of the commandments of God.” (1 Corinthians 7:19)

    • “But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully.” (1 Timothy 1:8)

    • ““And hereby we do know that we know him, if we keep his commandments.” (1 John 2:3)

    • “Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.” (1 John 3:4)

    • “By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God, and keep his commandments.” (1 John 5:2)

    • “For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous.” (1 John 5:3)

    • “And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.” (Revelation 12:17)

    • “Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.” (Revelation 14:12)

    • “Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.” (Revelation 22:14)

      For more, see free online book "Law and Kingdom: Their Relevance Under the New Covenant" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/law-kingdomFrame.html.

    3 weeks, 1 day ago on What Would Jesus Do? Not what this liberal says He would do

    Reply
    • “For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.” (Mathew 5:18)

    • “Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.” (Matthew 5:19)

    • “Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? And in thy name have cast out devils? And in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity [anomian – lawlessness].” (Matthew 7:21-23)

    • “…truth [is] in the law.” (Romans 2:20)

    • “…by the law is the knowledge of sin.” (Romans 3:20)

    • “Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.” (Romans 3:31)

    • “Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.” (Romans 7:12)

    • “For we know that the law is spiritual….” (Romans 7:14)

    • “That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.” (Romans 8:4)

    • “Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.” (Romans 8:7)

    • “Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but the keeping of the commandments of God.” (1 Corinthians 7:19)

    • “But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully.” (1 Timothy 1:8)

    • ““And hereby we do know that we know him, if we keep his commandments.” (1 John 2:3)

    • “Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.” (1 John 3:4)

    • “By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God, and keep his commandments.” (1 John 5:2)

    • “For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous.” (1 John 5:3)

    • “And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.” (Revelation 12:17)

    • “Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.” (Revelation 14:12)

    • “Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.” (Revelation 22:14)

      For more, see free online book "Law and Kingdom: Their Relevance Under the New Covenant" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/law-kingdomFrame.html.

    3 weeks, 1 day ago on Jefferson’s law of castration and maiming: the tyranny of humanistic law

    Reply

    "The law of Yahweh is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of Yahweh is sure, making wise the simple. The statutes of Yahweh are right, rejoicing the heart: the commandment of Yahweh is pure, enlightening the eyes. The fear of Yahweh is clean, enduring for ever: the JUDGMENTS of Yahweh are true and righteous altogether. More to be desired are they than gold, yea, than much fine gold: sweeter also than honey and the honeycomb. Moreover by them is thy servant warned: and in keeping of them there is great reward." (Psalm 19:7-11)


    How tragic that even most theonomists are only two-thirds pronomian, rejecting the altogether righteous judgments of Yahweh's triune moral law (His commandments, statutes, and judgments). Whoever determines what is and what is not crime and metes out judgments rules society.


    For more on how the judgments are just as applicable under the New Covenant as are the commandments and statutes, see online Chapter 17 "Amendment 8: Bail, Fines, and Cruel and Unusual Punishments" of "Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/biblelaw-constitutionalism-pt17.html.

    3 weeks, 1 day ago on Jefferson’s law of castration and maiming: the tyranny of humanistic law

    Reply

    "'What would Jesus do?' has become a mantra among contemporary Christians. It’s a great question, but only when answered by the Biblical standard. Far too often, each person is left to determine his own standard by which to answer this question. This amounts to forcing upon Jesus one’s own standard rather than seeking His.

    "Truth be known, most Christians don’t want to know what Jesus would do. This is because the vast majority of today’s churches are antinomian (opposed to Yahweh’s1 law under the New Covenant2), whereas Jesus was entirely pronomian. If He were living today, today’s antinomian churches would surely excommunicate him.

    It was imperative that Jesus keep the law. Otherwise, He would have been a sinner and unable to be our sinless sacrifice...."

     

    For more on what the Biblical Jesus would do, see "WWJD? Are You SURE You Want to Know?" Part 1 at http://www.constitutionmythbusters.org/wwjd-are-you-sure-you-want-to-know-pt-1/, followed by Part 2.

    3 weeks, 1 day ago on What Would Jesus Do? Not what this liberal says He would do

    Reply

    Barney, let's see if I have this correct: Provided I preached Christ crucified, I'm relieved of proclaiming His as resurrected Sovereign and King, and I'm not responsible for the consequences for failing to be not only a light to the world but also salt to the earth, per Matthew 5:13. Providing I know Christ and Him crucified, I'm also not required to fulfill the dominion mandate as found in both Matthew 28:18-20 AND 2 Corinthians 10:4-6. 


    Great! I can instead look forward to being one of the trampled instead of one of the "tramplers," per Matthew 5:13.

    1 month, 1 week ago on Hall of shame: new critics of Theonomy, same old fallacies

    Reply

    @larryeball Theonomy or Tyranny: Those really are the only two choices.

    1 month, 1 week ago on Hall of shame: new critics of Theonomy, same old fallacies

    Reply

    It's because of such pastors that modern Christianity (what in 1600s America was Christendom, Christians dominionizing on behalf of Christ) is best described by Christ, in Matthew 5:13, as salt that's lost its savor, good for nothing but to be trampled under the foot of man.


    Men such as Hall obviously don't believe in our commission as ambassadors of the King of kings:


    "For the weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh, but divinely powerful for the destruction of fortresses.  We are destroying speculations and EVERY lofty thing raised up against the knowledge of God, and we are taking EVERY thought captive to the obedience of Christ, and we are ready to punish ALL disobedience, whenever your obedience is complete." (2 Corinthians 10:4-6)


    Part of the problem is that many Christians think the kingdom here on earth is impossible. Hardly! See "10 Reasons the Kingdom Here on Earth Isn't Mission Impossible" at http://www.constitutionmythbusters.org/10-reasons-the-kingdom-here-on-earth-isnt-mission-impossible/.

    1 month, 1 week ago on Hall of shame: new critics of Theonomy, same old fallacies

    Reply

    @Lonestarwife See "10 Reasons the Kingdom Here on Earth Isn't Mission Impossible" at http://www.constitutionmythbusters.org/10-reasons-the-kingdom-here-on-earth-isnt-mission-impossible/.


    For anyone, not yet convinced the kingdom already exists, see "Republic or Kingdom: Which Are YOU Promoting?" at http://www.constitutionmythbusters.org/republic-or-kingdom-which-are-you-promoting-pt-1/.

    2 months, 1 week ago on Taxing like a harlot

    Reply

    I wonder if the following might not have a bearing on what's taking place over in the Middle East, especially from a Biblical perspective:


    "Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a “Jew” or to call a contemporary Jew an “Israelite” or a “Hebrew.”" (Richard Siegel and Carl Rheins, eds., “Identity Crisis,” The Jewish Almanac, (New York, NY: Bantam Books, 1980) p. 3.)

    That most of today's Jews are not genetic Israelites is also attested to in the Jewish Encyclopedia,  the Encyclopedia Judaica, the Universal Encyclopedia, the Standard Jewish Encyclopedia, and by some of their own anthropologists and historians.


    For more on the identity of today's Israelites, Jews, and gentiles, see online book "The Mystery of the Gentiles: Who Are They and Where Are They Now?" at http://www.missiontoisrael.org/mystery-of-gentiles/index.php.

    2 months, 1 week ago on Cruzifiction

    Reply

    @DJustice @TedRWeiland Excellent observations!

    2 months, 2 weeks ago on Is there such thing as “legitimate taxation”?

    Reply

    @MichaelPaulTuuri @TedRWeiland @Alex Alexander Amen! What a blessed people we are--blessed ambassadors of the KING of kings--when we submit ourselves wholly to Him and His will for our lives!

    2 months, 2 weeks ago on Is there such thing as “legitimate taxation”?

    Reply

    @Alex Alexander @TedRWeiland @MichaelPaulTuuri Perhaps the following will help:


    "... Because it is impossible for man to make law, he is either a usurper or merely an administrator of Yahweh’s law. 

    "Administrators (not to be confused with judges) are law finders, not lawmakers. An administrator’s responsibility is to implement Yahweh’s law (government) here on earth at all levels of society—individually, domestically, and civilly. Every Christian man should be an administrator of Yahweh’s law on at least the first two levels.

    Administrators represent Yahweh, not the people. It is their duty to search out the law of Yahweh as it applies to any particular situation, and then to teach and implement the law(s) appropriate to that situation or need.7

    "This does not mean supplementary stipulations cannot be implemented, provided they are consonant with Yahweh’s prescribed law. For example, a father, who governs his family by God’s authority and with His law has the liberty to implement house rules, such as hygienic and household chores. The same is true on all other levels of society...."

    Excerpted from "A Biblical Constitution" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/biblicalConstitution.html.

    2 months, 2 weeks ago on Is there such thing as “legitimate taxation”?

    Reply

    @MichaelPaulTuuri @Alex Alexander @TedRWeiland Indeed! If only even more alleged pronomians understood as much.

    2 months, 2 weeks ago on Is there such thing as “legitimate taxation”?

    Reply

    @Christopher_83 @TedRWeiland Thank YOU for being willing to consider both sides.

    2 months, 2 weeks ago on Is there such thing as “legitimate taxation”?

    Reply

    @Don @TedRWeiland @vRico Yet to deal with these issues!?! Go back and read my responses and "Law and Kingdom: Their Relevance Under the New Covenant" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/law-kingdomFrame.html, in which Galatians 3:23-25 is key to the discussion therein.

    The operative word (and key to understanding Paul's position on the law) in Galatians 2:19-21 (like in Roman 10:4 and elsewhere) is "righteousness" in the phrase "if righteousness come by the law Christ is dead in vain."



    2 months, 2 weeks ago on Calvin’s great error on biblical law

    Reply

    @Christopher_83 @TedRWeiland Christopher, believe it or not, just yesterday I was actually hoping someone would provide Hallbrook's diatribe against me that I might have the opportunity to provide my response to a wider audience. 

    I hope you'll carefully consider my reply "An Open Response to Stephen Hallbrook's "Beware of Ted R. Weiland" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/onlineBooks/stephen-halbrook-response.html.

    2 months, 2 weeks ago on Is there such thing as “legitimate taxation”?

    Reply

    @MichaelPaulTuuri @TedRWeiland You're right to equate speed laws to the parapet laws, which you are free to build or not build. However, don't build them and you become accountable to lex talionis and related laws if someone falls off your roof and breaks their neck. The same with speeding. The deterrent effect of lex talionis would be enough to dissuade the majority of people from excessive speed. That said, a property owner would have the right to regulate speed on his property, nonetheless.


    What man legalizes is often a Band Aide on a self-inflicted wound. Until under Yahweh's law, the Band Aide (in this instance, speed laws) is better than unrestrained illegality (in this instance, unchecked speeding).


    I'm presently preaching on the immigration crisis, on our southern border in particular. It's entitled "Immigration: Lawful, Legal, and Illegal, AKA: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly." I point out in the introductory message that until the Good is implemented, the Bad is better than the Ugly.

    2 months, 2 weeks ago on Is there such thing as “legitimate taxation”?

    Reply

    @MichaelPaulTuuri @TedRWeiland I have a entire section on lex talionis in the online Chapter 17 "Amendment 8: Bail, Fines, and Cruel and Unusual Punishments" of "Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/biblelaw-constitutionalism-pt17.html. I hope it helps.


    I don't believe the entire nation would have to repent, anymore than it did here in America in the late 1700s when it only took a minority to bring about a revolution. And don't forget Yahweh is a majority with or without us. Even you haven't already, be sure to read "10 Reasons Why the Kingdom Here on Earth Isn't Mission Impossible" at http://www.constitutionmythbusters.org/10-reasons-the-kingdom-here-on-earth-isnt-mission-impossible/.


    Also, don't rule out the impact of Yahweh's judgment upon this wicked nation (very likely meaning most of today's population will be eliminated, Yellowstone's volcano alone would accomplish this), followed by secession by those who would choose to live by government of, by, and for God, based upon His immutable and perfect moral law.

    2 months, 2 weeks ago on Is there such thing as “legitimate taxation”?

    Reply

    @DeanMay 

    When one understands that the principal means by which we keep the First Commandment is by observing Yahweh's other moral laws and that idolatry is not so much about statues as it is statutes, it becomes clear that all governments are theocratic, serving either the true God or some surrogate god, demonstrated by what laws they keep and consider the supreme law of the land.

    "...There is no escaping theocracy. A government’s laws reflect its morality, and the source of that morality (or, more often than not, immorality) is its god. It is never a question of theocracy or no theocracy, but whose theocracy. The American people, by way of their elected officials, are the source of the Constitutional Republic’s laws. Therefore, the Constitutional Republic’s god is WE THE PEOPLE.

    "People recoil at the idea of a theocracy’s morality being forced upon them, but because all governments are theocracies, someone’s morality is always being enforced. This is an inevitability of government. The question is which god, theocracy, laws, and morality will we choose to live under?..."

    For more, see online Chapter 3 "The Preamble: WE THE PEOPLE vs. YAHWEH" at bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/biblelaw-constitutionalism-pt3.html.

    2 months, 2 weeks ago on Is there such thing as “legitimate taxation”?

    Reply

    Let me provide you with ten reasons, you're wrong: See "10 Reasons Why the Kingdom Here on Earth Isn't Mission Impossible" at http://www.constitutionmythbusters.org/10-reasons-the-kingdom-here-on-earth-isnt-mission-impossible/.


    If you're not convinced the restored kingdom already exists, you should begin with the two-part "Republic or Kingdom: Which Are YOU Promoting?" Part 1 can be found at http://www.constitutionmythbusters.org/republic-or-kingdom-which-are-you-promoting-pt-1/.

    2 months, 2 weeks ago on Is there such thing as “legitimate taxation”?

    Reply

    @MichaelPaulTuuri Speed limits would not be necessary under Biblical law, lex talionis in particular. I should be able to drive whatever speed I like (unless otherwise dictated by private property owners). At the same time, I know that I will also be subject to lex talionis and related laws for any loss of life, limb, or property damaged.


    As for Biblical taxes, I agree with you. See my response to Joel's article.

    2 months, 2 weeks ago on Is there such thing as “legitimate taxation”?

    Reply

    @Don @TedRWeiland @vRico All of your responses are indicative that you have yet to correctly harmonize Paul's teaching and to properly distinguish between what law Paul is referring to in any given context.


    Furthermore, Pastor Bolton did not claim that the law improves one character, nor do I. But Holy-Spirit directed character leads us to the law to frame our way of life.


    Neither the Spirit, grace, nor faith are at odds with the triune moral law of Yahweh, as you appear to want to make them. They all compliment each other perfectly:


    "Do we then make void the law through faith [or grace or the Spirit]? God forbid: yea, we establish the law." (Romans 3:31)


    Be careful that you don't find yourself in company with those Jude depicted:

    "For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness [licentiousness], and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ." (Jude 1:4)


    If you have access to an 1828 Webster's Dictionary, look up the word "licentiousness."

    2 months, 2 weeks ago on Calvin’s great error on biblical law

    Reply

    Contextual evidence dictates that Romans 13:1-7 is exclusively describing a Biblical government, governed by Biblically qualified leaders, specifically judges, no different than what we find in Exodus 18:21-22. (Anything else is to promote a two kingdom theology.) Consequently, Biblical taxes are acknowledged and promoted by Paul.


    The Levitical system was a government more than anything else. And, more often than not, the Levites served as judges.


    A workman is worthy of his due (Matthew 10:10). Elders (like those who were appointed as judges in Exodus 18) are due wages, sometimes double wages (1 Timothy 5:171-8). Where is their pay to come from? From taxes, Biblical taxes, meaning the tithe.


    Regrettably, the Greek word "ekklesia" was poorly translated "church," which doesn't begin to describe the body politic it refers to. We're so used to thinking of the tithe for maintaining "Church" buildings, etc., we've lost the real intent of ekklesia and that that tithe is plrinciple purpose is for maintaining a Christian body politic, like described in Romans 13, 1 Corinthians 6:1-6, 1 Timothy 1:8-11, etc.

    For more on a proper interpretation of Romans 13, see "Christian Duty Under Corrupt Government: A Revolutionary Commentary on Romans 13:1-7" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/Store.html#B028.

    2 months, 2 weeks ago on Is there such thing as “legitimate taxation”?

    Reply

    @Don @vRico @TedRWeiland Hmm! sound a lot like  what Puritan minister Samuel Bolton wrote, “The law sends us to the gospel for our justification; the gospel sends us to the law to frame our way of life.” especially when tied in with:

    “For we know that the law is spiritual….” (Romans 7:14)

    “That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.” (Romans 8:4)

    2 months, 2 weeks ago on Calvin’s great error on biblical law

    Reply

    @Don @TedRWeiland I've already answered that for you. You'll find a more complete answer in the online book "Law and Kingdom: Their Relevance Under the New Covenant" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/law-kingdomFrame.html. The first part of this book is devoted to answering this very question.

    2 months, 2 weeks ago on Calvin’s great error on biblical law

    Reply

    @Don @vRico @TedRWeiland 

    "...If Yahweh’s commandments, statutes, and judgments were not the law to which Paul alluded in Galatians 3, to what law was he referring? Galatians 3:19 refers to two different laws: one that existed before Mt. Sinai (the commandments, statutes, and judgments that the Hebrews transgressed) and the Covenant (containing those same commandments, statutes, and judgments) that was added and codified at Mt. Sinai. Hebrews 7:19-22 uses the words “covenant” and “law” interchangeably. Although comprised of other components, a covenant is a law in itself, only more comprehensive in its scope and application. Galatians 3:19 is correctly interpreted in the following fashion:

    Wherefore then serveth the law [Mosaic Covenant]? It was added because of transgressions [of Yahweh’s commandments, statutes, and judgments during the Abrahamic Covenant]…. (Galatians 3:19)

    "Yahweh’s commandments, statutes, and judgments were already in existence. They were not the law added at Mt. Sinai, and therefore they could not have been abolished under the New Covenant. The Mosaic Covenant was added at Mt. Sinai. It was the schoolmaster (mentioned in Galatians 3:24) that was abolished when Jesus sacrificed Himself in payment for our sins:

    The Old Covenant was a contract that was added and attached to YHWH’s law. YHWH’s law predated the Old Covenant, thus, the Old Covenant does not equate to YHWH’s law. The Old Covenant was added and attached to YHWH’s law that already existed. The Old covenant was a package that came and went on its own … without changing or altering YHWH’s law. When the Old Covenant came, it was not the start of YHWH’s law … and when the Old Covenant ended, it was not the end of YHWH’s law.

    …He [Jesus] certainly did not do away with the law. He established a New Covenant (a new attachment) as an advanced and more efficient approach to fulfilling and obeying YHWH’s law.13

    "Many contemporary Christians believe a “higher” New Covenant law superseded the Old Covenant law. Although the New Covenant did supersede the Old Covenant (Hebrews 7:22, 8:6-7), it does not supersede the Old Covenant canon because Yahweh’s moral laws are the same under both Covenants. One covenant replaced the other, but the moral law of Yahweh remains the same under both covenants....''

    For more, see "Law and Kingdom: Their Relevance Under the New Covenant" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/law-kingdomFrame.html.

    2 months, 2 weeks ago on Calvin’s great error on biblical law

    Reply

    @vRico @TedRWeiland "While some theologians make the argument only the laws specifically sited by the authors of the NT  are still in place I find that hermeneutic assumptive...."

    If this argument is valid, say good bye to both the First and Third Commandments (not to mention statutes that forbid such things as bestialty) because neither are restated in the New Testament.

    2 months, 2 weeks ago on Calvin’s great error on biblical law

    Reply