Livefyre Profile

Activity Stream

@Lonestarwife Thanks for responding. Yes, Rushdoony's "Institutes" should be a must for every Christian's library. I would also recommend his son-in-law Gary North's "Tools of Dominion: The Case Laws of Exodus" and his "Conspiracy in Philadelphia: The Broken Covenant of the U.S. Constitution."


You might also be interested in taking our Constitution Survey at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/ConstitutionSurvey.html, by which you'll receive a free copy of the 85-page "Primer" of the 565-page "Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective. I'd love to send you a copy. This offer is extended to everyone at this site.


Blessings!

2 days, 2 hours ago on Why Abortionists, Islam, and Homosexuals Will Ultimately Lose

Reply

Gary DeMar: "Some of the greatest civilizations that the world has ever known are tourist attractions."

This goes for the United States Constitutional Republic as well, which was destined to fall from it's inception:

"And every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand: And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it." (Matthew 7;26-27)

"And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand." (Matthew 12:25)

Not only was the house known as the Constitutional Republic a divided house from its genesis, it was NOT built upon the law/word of God. Consequently, like all governments and societies of, by, and and for the people (regardless the form), the Constitutional Republic is already well on its way to becoming a tourist attraction. This is why our work should be on behalf of the Kingdom here on earth as it is in heaven (Matthew 6:10, 33) rather than the Republic.

For more, see our latest blog article "Republic or Kingdom: Which Are YOU Promoting? Pt. 1" at http://www.constitutionmythbusters.org/republic-or-kingdom-which-are-you-promoting-pt-1/.

2 days, 21 hours ago on Why Abortionists, Islam, and Homosexuals Will Ultimately Lose

Reply

As bad as this is, what's worse is men (pronomians) who know the answer to America's social problems and neglect or refuse to use those answers to try to save America from her moral free fall; and who, instead, spend their time in telling or hearing something new.


See blog article "The Internet: Today's Areopagus"at http://www.constitutionmythbusters.org/the-internet-todays-areopagus/, followed by "Time For Pronomians to Come Out of the Closet."

6 days, 23 hours ago on Poll confirms pulpit cowardice and moneygrubbing; Let’s address this now

Reply

@JohnCummins @TedRWeiland The "Primer" is only 85-pages. I'll need your address to send it to you. You can either provide it via our Constitution Survey at the address above or via my personal email address at tweiland@vistabeam.com.

1 week ago on Inglorious Kingdoms – NEW eBook

Reply

@JohnCummins @TedRWeiland Sorry for not getting it and thanks for the explanation. I'm pleased we're on the same page on this.


I think you'd appreciate our 85-page "Primer" of the 565-page "Bible Law vs. the Unites States Constitution: The Christian Perspective." You (or anyone else here) can receive a free copy of the "Primer" by taking our Constitution Survey at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/ConstitutionSurvey.html


I'd love to send you a copy.


Blessings!

1 week ago on Inglorious Kingdoms – NEW eBook

Reply

@JohnCummins @TedRWeiland John, thanks for responding. 


Being that conservative Christians continue to be the Constitution's most aggressive proponents, it would seem most do NOT know it, or, if they do, they refuse to repent.


In either case, I intend to keep hammering away at America's national idol as the cause for why America finds herself teetering on the precipice of moral depravity and destruction.

1 week ago on Inglorious Kingdoms – NEW eBook

Reply

Anyone who in any way espouses Article 6's claim that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and it's Christian test ban, which not only outlaws Biblical qualifications for civil leadership, but allows non-Christians (including atheists, Muslims, Hindus, Jews, etc.) to rule over Christians, is also a proponent of the two-kingdom theology.


For more, see online Chapter 9 "Article 6: The Supreme Law of the Land" of "Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/biblelaw-constitutionalism-pt9.html.

1 week ago on Inglorious Kingdoms – NEW eBook

Reply

@Solon the Wise @TedRWeiland First, no one here has assaulted you any more than you've assaulted others here.


Second, Paul was not guilty of what he was assaulted for. It was a false accusation.

2 weeks, 2 days ago on Scripture in the hands of the State (or, what happens when the church won’t preach biblical law)

Reply

@Solon the Wise @TedRWeiland First, no one (whether Israelite or non-Israelite) can be saved except by God's grace and calling and the blood of Christ. You seem to indicate otherwise.

Second, no one here is talking about salvation, justification, forgiveness of sins through keeping the law. That you have reduced this discussion to this (as most antinomians invariably do) only goes to show you do not understand the proper application of the moral law of Yahweh as found in the New Testament.



2 weeks, 3 days ago on Scripture in the hands of the State (or, what happens when the church won’t preach biblical law)

Reply

@Uncle Dave @TedRWeiland So, somebody has to be wrong, right? And what standard should we use to determine which position is correct? A bunch of dead politicians' statements (often taken out of context) by Barton, the king of the cherry pickers? Or by the only standard by which everything (including the Constitution) must be ethically judged: Yahweh's immutable morality as reflected in His triune law (His commandments, statutes, and judgments)?


Hopefully, you'll agree that the Constitution must be judged by the latter. And when the Constitution is actually measured by this standard, it is found to be anything but a Biblically compatible document. There is hardly an Article or Amendment that is not antithetical, if not seditious, to Yahweh's sovereignty and morality.


For evidence, see online book "Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective," in which a chapter is devoted to examining every Article and Amendment by the Bible, at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/blvc-index.html.


If you (or anyone else here) will take our Constitution Survey in the right-hand sidebar, you'll receive a complimentary copy of the 85-page "Primer" of the 565-page "BL vs. USC." I hope you will; I'd love to send you a copy.

2 weeks, 3 days ago on Scripture in the hands of the State (or, what happens when the church won’t preach biblical law)

Reply

@Solon the Wise @TedRWeiland So, I take it, you've decided to pit Scripture against Scripture rather than harmonize them. 


If you correctly understood what Paul meant by "the works of the law" and being "under the law," you wouldn't pit Scripture against Scripture but be able to see how everything Paul wrote on the law harmonizes perfectly.

Please consider Puritan minister Samuel Bolton's explanation: “The law sends us to the gospel for our justification; the gospel sends us to the law to frame our way of life.”

I address all of this in "Law and Kingdom: Their Relevance Under the New Covenant" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/law-kingdomFrame.html. I hope you'll take a look, because right now you're in the category Jude depicted in the following:


"For certain persons have crept in unnoticed, those who were long beforehand marked out for this condemnation, ungodly persons who turn the grace of our God into licentiousness and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ." (Jude 1:4)


If you have access to an 1828 Webster's Dictionary, look up the word "licentiousness."



2 weeks, 3 days ago on Scripture in the hands of the State (or, what happens when the church won’t preach biblical law)

Reply

@Solon the Wise @TedRWeiland Amen and praise God! 


Now how about you? Are you pitting this passage against the others from Paul that I posted (by the way, on your behalf), or will you likewise praise God for them and repent of your misrepresentation of Paul's teachings?

2 weeks, 3 days ago on Scripture in the hands of the State (or, what happens when the church won’t preach biblical law)

Reply

“…truth [is] in the law.” (Romans 2:20)

“…by the law is the knowledge of sin.” (Romans 3:20)

“Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.” (Romans 3:31)

“Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.” (Romans 7:12)

“For we know that the law is spiritual….” (Romans 7:14)

“That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.” (Romans 8:4)

"Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.” (Romans 8:7)

“Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but the keeping of the commandments of God.” (1 Corinthians 7:19)

"But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully.” (1 Timothy 1:8)

For more on how the moral law applies and should be implemented today, see "Law and Kingdom: Their Relevance Under the New Covenant" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/law-kingdomFrame.html.

2 weeks, 3 days ago on Scripture in the hands of the State (or, what happens when the church won’t preach biblical law)

Reply

@MichaelPaulTuuri @Uncle Dave Indeed! But God has given us the weapons to get the job done if only we'd put them to use:

"For the weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh, but divinely powerful for the destruction of fortresses. We are destroying speculations and EVERY lofty thing raised up against the knowledge of God, and we are taking EVERY thought captive to the obedience of Christ, and we are ready to punish ALL disobedience, whenever your obedience is complete." (2 Corinthians 10:4-6)

2 weeks, 3 days ago on Scripture in the hands of the State (or, what happens when the church won’t preach biblical law)

Reply

Joel McDurmon: "[W]hat happens when the church won’t preach biblical law..."

Wlhat's worse is when the theonomists won't preach biblical law. Joel's an exception.

See our latest blog article "The Internet: Today's Areopagus" at http://www.constitutionmythbusters.org/the-internet-todays-areopagus/.

2 weeks, 3 days ago on Scripture in the hands of the State (or, what happens when the church won’t preach biblical law)

Reply

Joel McDurmon: "Without Biblical Law defining the categories and boundaries of justice, we are left with the relativism of men, the agendas of men, the desires of men—which means the agendas of powerful men unhinged."

Like what was done by the late 1700 Enlightenment and Masonic founders who produced a Biblically seditious Constitution and that's consequently responsible for everything gone wrong in America today:


"...3. Every problem America faces today can be traced back to the fact that the framers failed to expressly establish a government upon Yahweh’s immutable morality as codified in His commandments, statutes, and judgments. (Would infanticide and sodomy be tolerated, let alone financed by the government, if Yahweh’s perfect law and altogether righteous judgments were the law of the land? Would Islam be a looming threat to our peace and security if the First Amendment had been replaced with the First Commandment? Would Americans be in nearly as much debt if usury had been outlawed as a form of theft? Would crime be as rampant if “cruel and unusual punishment” had not been outlawed and criminals were instead punished with Yahweh’s altogether righteous judgments? Would we be on the fiscal cliff if we were taxed with a flat increase tax rather than a graduated income tax?)...."

For more, see "5 Reasons the Constitution: The Christian Perspective" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/.

2 weeks, 3 days ago on Scripture in the hands of the State (or, what happens when the church won’t preach biblical law)

Reply

@compugor In light of Jude 1:4, the question is whether they ARE Christians. At best, they're least in the kingdom (Matthew 5:19).

3 weeks, 1 day ago on A revelation on the real reason behind two-kingdoms theology

Reply

@Charispistis If you're able to come up with the documentation, please share it.

3 weeks, 2 days ago on A revelation on the real reason behind two-kingdoms theology

Reply

@Charispistis I don't know who said it, but it's tragically true. Thanks for sharing it.

3 weeks, 2 days ago on A revelation on the real reason behind two-kingdoms theology

Reply

@beihai @TedRWeiland Change the subject!?! I don't think so, I'm just following orders. That you can't even respond  in a civil fashion with something of substance without using profanity, dictates Proverbs 26:4 and Matthew 7:6.

1 month, 1 week ago on Conversation @ http://www.newrepublic.com/article/118737/2014-midterm-win-would-test-new-gop-majority

Reply

Matter!?!

Here we go again! Yes, OF COURSE, voting holds the silver bullet for saving America from the precipice of moral depravity and destruction upon which she so precipitously teeters--NOT! Rather, voting is today's opiate for the masses.

The eternal optimism (AKA, extremely short memories) of the American electorate astounds me. Despite the fact that the last 225 years of unbiblical constitutional elections have only produced an America that is more ungodly, less Christian, and more enslaved, REGARDLESS who's elected, every four years they march right back to the voting booths, thinking this time, perhaps this time, will be different. They did it in the last election despite the worst two candidates America has ever seen. And, of course, all the pundits are now talking about it doing it all over again, and again, and again....

As long as Article 9's Christian test ban (and with it the elimination of Biblical qualifications) is left intact, elections will only continue to provide more of the same: nincompoops, scoundrels, and outright criminals (donkeys and elephants alike).

Election day is the Constitutional Republic's high holy day, when the American voting public (non-Christians and Christians alike) worship at the altar of the humanistic (per the Preamble), antichristian (per Article 6), and polytheistic (per Amendment 1) U.S. Constitution--America's national idol.

Americans cannot vote themselves off the cliff they find themselves on. They must repent themselves off, beginning, like Gideon of old, with their fathers' idol.

If you're like me, tired of what hasn't, can't, and never will work, and want some real answers for our nation, you might find our free online book "Law and Kingdom: Their Relevance Under the New Covenant" helpful as a place to begin. It can be found at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/law-kingdomFrame.html.

Then take our Constitution Survey at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/ConstitutionSurvey.html by which you will receive a free (postage-paid) copy of an 85-page book that EXAMINES the Constitution by the Bible.

 

1 month, 1 week ago on Conversation @ http://www.newrepublic.com/article/118737/2014-midterm-win-would-test-new-gop-majority

Reply

@DMJ @TedRWeiland Agreed. However, because this battle (and all other cultural battles) have been commissioned to Christians (2 Corinthians 10:3-6), it is especially relevant that they stop using the enemy's terminology.

1 year ago on Liberals Use The Word “Choice” To Make Murder Sound Cool!

Reply

@movwater@TedRWeiland 

"Be ye therefore very courageous to keep and to do all that is written in the book of the law of Moses, that ye turn not aside therefrom to the right hand or to the left; that ye come not among these nations, these that remain among you; neither make mention of the name of their gods, nor cause to swear by them, neither serve them, nor bow yourselves unto them:" (Joshuah 23:6-7)


"Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." (John 14:6)

1 year ago on Liberals Use The Word “Choice” To Make Murder Sound Cool!

Reply

The Greek word "brephos" employed in the New Testament for infants already born is the same word used for infants in the womb  (Luke 2:12 and Luke 1:41), without specifying the precise moment they became a "brephos." Therefore, our only option is to then accept that they became such at conception. Thus, intentionally killing a brephos at any point is "brephocide" or, more properly, infanticide.

1 year ago on Liberals Use The Word “Choice” To Make Murder Sound Cool!

Reply

"Words are extremely important because they are our most effective way to convey meaning, to describe the world around us and to describe what we believe to be the truth. The scary part about words is that they can be twisted to disguise something ugly and disgusting as something mundane and possibly even beautiful."

The same is true for the word "abortion." The battle against this atrocity begins with identifying it correctly. By calling it "abortion," we've already acquiesced to the opposition's terminology. Look up "abortion" and "miscarriage" in any dictionary. A miscarriage is an abortion. What doctors (and parents) do to infants in the womb is infanticide. Had Roe v. Wade been waged over infanticide rather than abortion, it would have never made it to the court room. In fact, by employing the word "abortion," Roe v. Wade was won before it ever got to court.

The point being, we Christians need to stop using the non-Christians' watered-down, politically correct terms such as "abortion" and "gay." It's infanticide and sodomy. There is no power in the former terms against evil and our first mistake is in acquiescing to the ungodly's terminology.

For more on this, listen to Part 1 of "Word Wars & Captive Thoughts" at http://www.missiontoisrael.org/tapelist.php#T849.

1 year ago on Liberals Use The Word “Choice” To Make Murder Sound Cool!

Reply

Let's see if I have this correct:  possible accidental inadvertent bullets meant to save children's lives are far worse than intentional bullets meant to kill children's lives!?!

1 year ago on [VIDEO] Arkansas school arming teachers with 9mm handguns

Reply

@arctific@TedRWeiland 

"...although the First Amendment does not allow for establishing one religion over another, by eliminating Christianity as the federal government’s religion of choice (achieved by Article 6's interdiction against Christian test oaths), Amendment 1 authorized equality for all non-Christian and even antichristian religions. When the Constitution failed to recognize Christian monotheism, it allowed Amendment 1 to fill the void by authorizing pagan polytheism.

"Amendment 1 did exactly what the framers proclaimed it could not do: it prohibited the exercise of monotheistic Christianity (except within the confines of its church buildings) and established polytheism in its place. This explains the government’s double standard regarding Christian and non-Christian religions. For example, court participants entering the United States District Court of Appeals for the Middle District of Alabama must walk by a statue of Themis, the Greek goddess of justice. And yet, on November 18, 2002, this very court ruled that Judge Roy Moore’s Ten Commandments Monument violated the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause. Despite many Christians’ protests against this hypocrisy, it was in keeping with the inevitable repercussions of the First Amendment....

"Christians hang their religious hat on Amendment 1, as if some great moral principle is carved therein. They have gotten so caught up in the battle over the misuse of the Establishment Clause – the freedom from religion – that they have overlooked the ungodliness intrinsic in the Free Exercise Clause – the freedom of religion [i.e., First Commandment violations]...." 

Excerpted from "Amendment 1: Government-Sanctioned Polytheism" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/biblelaw-constitutionalism-pt11.html.

1 year, 1 month ago on Can the 3rd Amendment Save Us from the NSA?

Reply

@arctific@TedRWeiland 

"...Christian Constitutionalists often point out that the phrase 'separation of church and state' is found in the Constitution of the USSR, not the Constitution of the United States. This is true. Nevertheless, the mandate for separation of church and state is inherent in Article 6 on two levels: 1) The Constitution is declared to be the supreme law of the land, which makes any law (secular or Biblical) contrary to this 'supreme law' null and void and non-executable by the Constitutional Republic, 2) Religious qualifications for government officials are denied, which prohibits Biblical qualifications [as the standard for civil rulers]....

"We can debate the intent of the framers, but we cannot debate the effect: Christendom became merely Christianity – salt that lost its savor and good for nothing but to be trampled under the foot of non-Christians. American Christians have been under the boot of non-Christians and antichrists ever since 1788. We will continue to be the trampled until finally we throw off the current secular government and erect a government based exclusively upon Yahweh’s law...."

 Excerpted from "Article 6: The Supreme Law of the Land?" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/biblelaw-constitutionalism-pt9.html.

 

1 year, 1 month ago on Can the 3rd Amendment Save Us from the NSA?

Reply

@arctific @TedRWeiland Governance doesn't have a chance in hell to being close to perfect when based upon the fickle traditions of man that are antithetical to Yahweh's perfect law and altogether righteous judgments (Psalm 19:7-11). What do you think provides us the best chance of doing it right(eous): Man's capricious immorality or Yahweh's immutable morality as codified in their respective laws?

1 year, 1 month ago on Can the 3rd Amendment Save Us from the NSA?

Reply

@arctific @TedRWeiland  I'm sorry I will not and cannot defend what is an unequivocal violation of the First Commandment because it "provides me the freedom" to practice my Christianity--that is, within the four walls of my house or church building!

How do you think Yahweh views the First Amendment. Think about it: Since the First Amendment was ratified America has been transformed from what was predominately a monotheistic Christian nation in the 1600s and early 1700s to most polytheistic nation to exist (with all the trimmings), with the possible exception of the Roman Empire.


1 year, 1 month ago on Can the 3rd Amendment Save Us from the NSA?

Reply

@arctific I would furthermore caution going to far with "making the most of tools we have." A prostitute could say the same.  Nadab and Abihu were condemned and killed for using "tools" not sanctioned by Yahweh. 

It's time Christians look beyond their own generation and to their posterity's and their posterity's posterity's generation and start doing what is best for them rather than trying to save what cannot be saved by what was conceived in sedition against Yahweh (even if unknowingly).


1 year, 1 month ago on Can the 3rd Amendment Save Us from the NSA?

Reply

@arctific @TedRWeiland Thanks for responding. There's much in what you say. However, I take exception to "it's the free exercise of religion that enables me to keep the highest commandment." Think about this statement and I think you will see that it makes the highest commandment subservient to Amendment 1 provision for the freedom of religion had enabled polytheism to thrive in America.

We are responsible for keeping the Greatest and the First Commandment regardless whether government says were free to so or not.

1 year, 1 month ago on Can the 3rd Amendment Save Us from the NSA?

Reply

Anyone who puts their faith in any part of the Constitution to save them from anything is demonstrating that it is indeed our national idol. Such faith is misplaced as proven by the last 225 years of the Constitutional Republic's rule. As early as the mid-1800s, Libertarian attorney Lysander Spooner (1808-1887) wrote that the Constitution “has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it.” (Lysander Spooner, No Treason, No. 7, The Constitution of No Authority)

Where America finds herself today  is precisely what anti-federalist like Patrick Henry forecast would come of the Constitution. In fact, nearly all of the anti-federalists' predictions have come true. Whereas none of the federalists predictions have been realized. Why? Simple. The framers failed to expressly establish government and society upon Yahweh's immutable morality as codified in His perfect law. 

Our faith needs to be in our Creator and Savior and then demonstrated in our obedience to His law rather than man's fickle traditions (Matthew 15:6-9).

For more regarding how His moral law applies today, see "Law and Kingdom: Their Relevance Under the New Covenant" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/law-kingdomFrame.html.


1 year, 1 month ago on Can the 3rd Amendment Save Us from the NSA?

Reply

"The rich rules over the poor, and the borrower becomes the lender's slave." (Proverbs 22:7)

The principle of this proverb should also be applied to what our children are "borrowing" from liberal intelligentsia! 


Christians who send heir children to the heathen to be educated is tantamount to the Old Testament Israelites sending their children to the Canaanites to be schooled.

1 year, 1 month ago on Savings! A “Solution” To College Debt? Or To Everything?

Reply

And the numbers will only get better, the more liberals murder their posterity. Those they let live are being dumbed down in our public school system. Consequently, Christians should not get discouraged but take heart, knowing the time's coming for our posterity when Christians will once again rule (like in 1600 America when the Colonials established governments of, by, and for Yahweh based upon His immutable morality as codified in His commandments, statutes, and judgments).

For more concerning ruling and reigning in and on behalf of Christ, see free online book "Law and Kingdom: Their Relevance Under the New Covenant" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/law-kingdomFrame.html.


1 year, 1 month ago on Polls Indicate That Pro-Abortion People are Killing Themselves Off

Reply

@RobertAlexander @TedRWeiland @Chris Lee Interesting. How about my replacement to Chris?

1 year, 2 months ago on You Don't Need Government's Permission To Obey God

Reply

@Chris Lee @TedRWeiland Scroll up or down; it's there.

1 year, 2 months ago on You Don't Need Government's Permission To Obey God

Reply

The Scripture reference in my original post in the last paragraph should be 1 Corinthians 11:14.

1 year, 2 months ago on You Don't Need Government's Permission To Obey God

Reply

The Scripture reference should be 1 Corinthians 11:14.

1 year, 2 months ago on You Don't Need Government's Permission To Obey God

Reply

That should be 1 Corinthians 11:14.

1 year, 2 months ago on You Don't Need Government's Permission To Obey God

Reply

Another great quote is "Any dead fish can flow with a current, it takes a live fighting one to swim upstream!" God bless Matt Birk for fulfilling the following:

"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them." (Ephesians 5:11)


1 year, 2 months ago on NFL Player Slams Obama For “God Bless Planned Parenthood.”

Reply

We just celebrated Memorial Day, which is a commemoration of the loss of life and limb in what have been, for the most part, ungodly military campaigns on behalf of America's imperialistic military-industrial complex, at the behest of the New World Order International bankers. Because Yahweh, the God of the Bible, promises victory and no casualties when a nation is in obedience to Him and conducts warfare according to His law, Memorial Day is, therefore, a celebration of our disobedience to Yahweh.

"...The power to declare war is a serious responsibility. Why were the framers so vague in defining the parameters of war and the conditions under which it could be declared? Section 8, Clause 11 is the only place of significance where warfare is mentioned in the Constitution. Little wonder this power has been abused. Luther Martin [one of Maryland's delegates to the Constitutional Convention] protested:

'…the congress have also a power given them to raise and support armies, without any limitation as to numbers, and without any restriction in time of peace. Thus, sir, this plan of government, instead of guarding against a standing army, that engine of arbitrary power, which has so often and so successfully been used for the subversion of freedom, has in its formation given it an express and constitutional sanction….' (Luther Martin, Jonathan Elliott, ed., The Debates in the Several State Conventions, on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, 4 vols. (Washington, DC: Jonathan Elliott, 1836) vol. 1, p. 40.)

John Quincy Adams predicted the consequences of America’s international military entanglements:

'America … has abstained from interference in the concerns of others, even when the conflict has been for principles to which she clings…. Wherever the standard of freedom and independence has been or shall be unfurled, there will her heart, her benedictions, and her prayers be. But she goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy.… She well knows that by once enlisting under other banners than her own, were they even the banners of foreign independence, she would involve herself beyond the power of extrication, in all the wars of interest and intrigue, of individual avarice, envy and ambition, which assume the colors, and usurp the standard of freedom. The fundamental maxims of her policy would insensibly change from liberty to force; the frontlet on her brow would no longer beam with the ineffable splendor of freedom and independence; but in its stead would soon be substituted an imperial diadem, flashing in false and tarnished luster, the murky radiance of dominion and power. She might become the dictatress of the world: she would be no longer the ruler of her own spirit.' ( John Quincy Adams, quoted in William H. Seward, Life and Public Services of John Quincy Adams (New York, NY: C.M. Saxton, Barker & Co., 1860) p. 132.)

"Because the framers provided no Biblical parameters, unbiblical warfare has been the rule ever since...."

 For more, see online Chapter 4 "Article 1: Legislative Usurpation" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/biblelaw-constitutionalism-pt4.html.

1 year, 2 months ago on Is Rand Paul Right About Jesus And War?

Reply

Charles Caleb Colton said: “Corruption is like a ball of snow, once it’s set a rolling, it must increase.”

 Corruption of WHAT? 

If you agree with Isaiah 33:22 and James 4:12 that declare Yahweh is the exclusive legislator and that, therefore, He is the only one with the authority to determine what is good and what is evil (or corrupt), then corruption can only be defined as what makes good evil and evil good (Isaiah 5:20).


That said, I would then ask: WHEN did this corruption begin in America? It's genesis was the framers' failure to establish government upon Yahweh's immutable morality as codified in His triune law (His commandments, statutes, and judgments). Because the framers failed in this regard, it was inevitable we would end up with the corrupt government we have today, including things such as the IRS scandal. In fact, under government of, by, and for Yahweh, there would be no IRS or Federal Reserve. For that matter, there would be no Obama as President.


For more, on how Yahweh's moral law applies today, see online book "Law and Kingdom: Their Relevance Under the New Covenant" at bibleversusconstitution.org/law-kingdomFrame.html. Also, don't miss our Constitution Survey in the right-hand sidebar.

1 year, 2 months ago on America Is Suffering Political Blood Poisoning With The IRS Scandal

Reply

@JoelJollymore @The real Smart Guy Any many who denies Christ's divinity, as Jefferson did to the end, is and antichrist according to the Apostle John, and anyone who condones such a man becomes a partaker in his deeds--2 John 1:7-11.

1 year, 3 months ago on Drug Screening: Can Liberals Act Logically?

Reply

@NWProgressive@The real Smart Guy@TedRWeilandDon't forget the Declaration was written by antichrist Jefferson, who who cut the virgin birth, miracles, resurrection, and ascension of Christ – what he described as a “dunghill” – out of his cut-and-paste New Testament. Therefore, according to 2 John 1:7-9, whatever god he was referring to was not Yahweh, the God of the Bible. The generic god-language of the Declaration is typical of the Enlightenment and the Masons.

1 year, 3 months ago on Drug Screening: Can Liberals Act Logically?

Reply

@The real Smart Guy @TedRWeiland I think you need to go back and carefully read my post, particularly the second paragraph and the date 1600. I agree with you regarding the Treaty of Tripoli, but it was referring to the government of the United States of America. The United States of America didn't exist in the 1600s.

1 year, 3 months ago on Drug Screening: Can Liberals Act Logically?

Reply

Of course, this is a Band-Aide on what is a much more consequential problem--called socialist theft, which no one in government today is immune from. Whether Democrats or Republicans, it's just a matter of degrees. But stealing is stealing is stealing. And stealing is a violation of the Eighth Commandment, which the framers failed to expressly establish government on. Thus, it was inevitable we would end up with a bunch of thieves (and worse) running this country, on both the federal and state level.

Time to get back to our true 1600 Christian roots when the Colonials established governments of, by, and for Yahweh based upon His immutable righteousness as codified in His commandments, statutes, and judgments instead of a humanistic government of, by, and for the people based upon the fickle traditions of finite man (Matthew 15:6-9).

Find out how much you really know about the Constitution as compared to the Bible, take our Constitution Survey at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/ConstitutionSurvey.html and receive a free copy of the 85-page "Primer" of the 565-page "Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective."


1 year, 3 months ago on Drug Screening: Can Liberals Act Logically?

Reply

There is only one answer for the Islaminization of America, and it's not what most people think it is. Listen to "The BIBLICAL Answer to the Islaminization of America" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/tapelist.html#T871, followed by "The BIBLICAL Answer to the Mosque at Ground Zero" at T 872.

1 year, 3 months ago on Maryland Blessed With $100 Million Turkish Mega-Mosque

Reply