TedRWeiland
Nebraksa
- 132 comments
- 23 likes given
- 78 likes received
Bio not provided
There is only one answer for the Islaminization of America, and it's not what most people think it is. Listen to "The BIBLICAL Answer to the Islaminization of America" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/tapelist.html#T871, followed by "The BIBLICAL Answer to the Mosque at Ground Zero" at T 872.
@lambsevYou're correct. His own pastors at First Church did not consider him a Christian. He was a Mason in all regards, in fact, a Worshipful Master when inaugurated President, with his hand on a Bible taken from one of the local Masonic Temples.
For a balanced approach to the late 17th-century key founders' religious beliefs (they were neither Deists in the purest sense of the word, nor were they Christians in the Biblical sense of the word), see Dr. Albert Mohler's interview with Dr. Gregg Frazer. Google for either the audio interview or a transcript of the same.
Dr. Mohler is President of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and Dr. Frazer is Professor of History at the Master's College in California.
After reading the interview, ask yourself what kind of document and government such men could have created. If you're interested in the answer, take our Constitution Survey at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/ConstitutionSurvey.html and receive a free copy of the 85-page "Primer" of 565-page "Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective."
@BobE @TedRWeiland @Greg137 Now, you're misinterpreting my mail to Greg. When will you ever learn!?!
@BobE @TedRWeiland @Greg137 There you go misinterpreting someone else's mail again.
@BobE @TedRWeiland @Greg137 Proverbs 26:4
@Greg137 Greg, Bob's been reading our mail (the Bible, most of which are epistles written to Christians) again. Consequently, he's, of course, clueless as to the correct interpretation for what's not intended for him (unless, he repents and surrenders his life to Christ.)
The passage he refers to is either Exodus 22:16-17 and Deuteronomy 22:28-29, both of which have to with consensual sex between a man and a virgin. Rape involves kidnapping and, according to Exodus 21:16, kidnapping is a capital crime.
@WolfyJam@TedRWeilandThanks for responding. I think you might enjoy listening to "The BIBLICAL Answer to the Islaminization of America" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/tapelist.html#T871, followed by "The BIBLICAL Answer to the Mosque at Ground Zero" at T 872.
Time for Americans (Christians in particular) to face up to WHY such things are occurring America. The reason is BECAUSE the late 18th-century framers failed to establish a Christian society based upon Yahweh's immutable morality as codified in His perfect law and altogether righteous judgments (Psalm 19:7-9) like their true 1600 Colonial Christian predecessors did.
If the framers had established government upon Yahweh's commandments, statutes, and judgments (including Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13) there would be no homosexual agenda here in America because no sodomite or lesbian would dare risk petitioning the government for their rights.
Find out how much you REALLY know about the Constitution as compared to the Bible. Take our Constitution Survey at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/ConstitutionSurvey.html and receive a free copy of the 85-page "Primer" of "Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective."
They could lower it to .01% and it still wouldn't take care of the problem:
"...Because Yahweh’s law does not altogether prohibit alcohol or drugs, the answer is not to make them illegal as the Eighteenth Amendment (and church edict) did. Just as Amendment 18 was inept at controlling alcoholic consumption, so are current drug regulations. Responsible use should be promoted by punishing only those who cause harm to another person or his property. For example, instead of attempting to curb drunk driving by prohibiting excessive alcohol consumption, any drunk driver convicted of causing or contributing to the death of an innocent person should be put to death or forced to pay whatever the next of kin requires as ransom for his life. If the injured or disabled party does not die, the convicted felon (instead of an insurance company) should be compelled to pay for medical expenses and financial compensation for lost wages during convalescence. This compensation should be in addition to an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, or the required ransom. If the perpetrator cannot pay the required compensation, he is to be indentured until his debt is paid. Lex talionis not only promotes personal responsibility, it eliminates the need for the insurance industry.
"...Today’s ineffective drug and alcohol laws have, in many instances, made criminals out of people who have hurt no one but themselves. This has forced innocent taxpayers to pay for the housing, feeding, and entertaining of people who should never have been imprisoned. Yahweh’s law makes people personally responsible for their actions, and His judgments substantially reduce both premeditated crime and careless disregard for the lives and property of others...."
For more, see free online Chapter 27 "Amendment 18: Repealed for Good Reason" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/biblelaw-constitutionalism-pt27.html.
Or if you prefer audio, listen to "The Second Amendment: A Knife in a Gunfight" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.com/#FeaturedMessages.
And eventually confiscate, they will. WHY? Because the Second Amendment cannot protect our weapons. Why do I say this? BECAUSE the Amendment with the phrase "shall not be infringed" is already the most infringed, licensed, and limited amendment of the entire twenty seven. This goes to also prove that the entire idea of optional rights (verses non-optional God-expected responsibilities) has been part and parcel of selling us down the river.
See "Rights, Rights, Everyone Wants Their Rights" at http://www.constitutionmythbusters.org/rights-rights-everyone-wants-their-rights/. Then read "You Can't Win Bringing a Knife to a Gunfight."
Pastor Runyon, as concerns your article "The Biblical Case for Private Gun Ownership," you might find the sermon "The Second Amendment: A Knife in a Gunfight," I recently preached at the Springfield, Missouri, Firearms and Freedom Symposium, in which I promote the Biblical responsibility to be armed in defense of families and neighbors. You can listen to it at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.com/#FeaturedMessages. At the same location, you'll find an interview Larry Pratt (Executive Director of Gun Owners of America) conducted with regarding the same subject.
Perhaps Christians will wake up now to the fact that they shouldn't be employed by the imperialistic, military-industrial complex to do the murdering of the international bankers in the first place.
Before someone accuses me of being a pacifist. I believe self-defense and protection of our families (and our neighbors) is not a right but a God-expected responsibility:
"But if anyone does not provide for his own, and especially for those of his household [including spiritual and physical protection], he has denied the faith, and is worse than an unbeliever. " (1 Timothy 5:8)
I also believe warfare is biblical, provided it's biblical.
@NancyLaw @TedRWeiland The question I'm asking is not why shouldn't they, but why ARE they here? What's the genesis? It goes much further back than what you might think--think 1791. Perhaps you will find the message I provided the URL to enlightening.
@NancyLaw @TedRWeiland Nancy, thank you for responding. But, I didn't ask what's the genesis of Muslim hate here in America, but what's the genesis of Muslims here in America?
In Exodus 21:22-25, etc., Yahweh, the God of the Bible, condemns infant murderers such as Planned Parenthood. Obviously then the god with whom Obama blessed his partners in murder is some other god than Yahweh. Instead, Obama's god is some form of Baal or Ashtoreth or Moloch. That said, how could such a man become the leader of the Christian United States of America? Simple: the UNITED STATES of America--that is--the Constitutional Republic NEVER was Christian. When the framers banned Christian tests (and thereby Biblical qualifications) in Article 6 and enabled polytheism to thrive in America by means of Amendment 1, what had been predominantly a monotheistic Christian nation ended and was very quickly transformed from one united nation under God to the most polytheistic nation ever, except perhaps for the Roman Empire. It was, consequently, inevitable that America would end up with murderers and other criminals ruling over the Constitutional Republic.
It is for the reason expressed above and many more that identifying and repenting of the Constitution for the national idol it is, is the cutting edge issue for this generation's Christians--that is, if we ever hope to prepare the way for a future generation of our posterity to some day in the future do it right(eous) the next time. For more, see "5 Reasons the Constitution is Our Cutting-Edge Issue" at http://www.constitutionmythbusters.org/sample-post/. Then you might want to sign our Petition for Forgiveness in the right-hand sidebar on the home page of our main site.
What is the genesis of the Muslims here in America? Until we address the reason they're here, we'll never see this problem eliminated. There is only one answer for the Islaminization of America, and it's not what most people think it is. Listen to "The BIBLICAL Answer to the Islaminization of America" at http://www.missiontoisrael.org/tapelist.php#T871, followed by "The BIBLICAL Answer to the Mosque at Ground Zero" at #T872.
MORE DISCONCERTING is the Judicial branch's continual adjudicating contrary to Biblical morality. However, being that the only qualification required for constitutional judges is undefined "good behavior," this should come as no surprise:
"...Nowhere does the Constitution stipulate that judges must rule on behalf of Yahweh, rendering decisions based upon His commandments, statutes, and judgments as required in Exodus 18. That not even one constitutional framer contended for Yahweh, as did King Jehoshaphat, speaks volumes about the framers’ disregard for Him and His judicial system:
'And he [King Jehoshaphat] set judges in the land throughout all the fenced cities of Judah, city by city, and said to the judges, Take heed what ye do: for ye judge not for man, but for YHWH, who is with you in the judgment…. And he charged them, saying, Thus shall ye do in the fear of YHWH, faithfully, and with a perfect heart.' (2 Chronicles 19:5-9)...."
For more, see online Chapter 6 "Article 3: Judicial Usurpation" of
"Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian
Perspective" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/biblelaw-constitutionalism-pt6.html.
Conservatives DO offer solutions, but what determines whether they're genuine conservatives is the source of their solutions:
"...Isaiah 33:22 and James 4:12 declare that Yahweh is the exclusive legislator. There are no others, period! Anyone who claims the title of legislator (particularly when his “laws”—whether commandments, statues, or judgments—are inconsonant with Yahweh’s) is a usurper and is perpetuating the sin begun by Adam and Eve. The same is true for any one of us who would modify Yahweh’s triune law.
"Any legislation antithetical to Yahweh’s turns evil to good and good to evil (Isaiah 5:20). When man rejects Yahweh’s standard of morality, it is inevitable he will make legal what Yahweh has made unlawful (e.g., infanticide and sodomy) and make illegal what Yahweh has made lawful (e.g., monotheistic Christianity outside the four walls of church buildings)...."
For more, see "Right, Left, and Center: Who Gets to Decide?" at http://www.constitutionmythbusters.org/right-left-and-center-who-gets-to-decide/.