Bio not provided
@beihai @TedRWeiland Proverbs 26:4 & Matthew 7:6
1 week, 3 days ago on Conversation @ http://www.newrepublic.com/article/118737/2014-midterm-win-would-test-new-gop-majority
@beihai @TedRWeiland Change the subject!?! I don't think so, I'm just following orders. That you can't even respond in a civil fashion with something of substance without using profanity, dictates Proverbs 26:4 and Matthew 7:6.
@beihai @TedRWeiland Proverbs 26:4
we go again! Yes, OF COURSE, voting holds the silver bullet for saving America
from the precipice of moral depravity and destruction upon which she
so precipitously teeters--NOT! Rather, voting is today's opiate for the masses.
eternal optimism (AKA, extremely short memories) of the American electorate
astounds me. Despite the fact that the last 225 years of unbiblical
constitutional elections have only produced an America that is more ungodly,
less Christian, and more enslaved, REGARDLESS who's elected, every four years
they march right back to the voting booths, thinking this time, perhaps this
time, will be different. They did it in the last election despite the worst two
candidates America has ever seen. And, of course, all the pundits are now
talking about it doing it all over again, and again, and again....
long as Article 9's Christian test ban (and with it the elimination of Biblical
qualifications) is left intact, elections will only continue to provide more of
the same: nincompoops, scoundrels, and outright criminals (donkeys and
day is the Constitutional Republic's high holy day, when the American voting
public (non-Christians and Christians alike) worship at the altar of the
humanistic (per the Preamble), antichristian (per Article 6), and polytheistic
(per Amendment 1) U.S. Constitution--America's national idol.
cannot vote themselves off the cliff they find themselves on. They must repent
themselves off, beginning, like Gideon of old, with their fathers' idol.
you're like me, tired of what hasn't, can't, and never will work, and want some
real answers for our nation, you might find our free online book "Law and
Kingdom: Their Relevance Under the New Covenant" helpful as a place to
begin. It can be found at
Then take our
Constitution Survey at
http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/ConstitutionSurvey.html by which you
will receive a free (postage-paid) copy of an 85-page book that EXAMINES the Constitution by
@DMJ @TedRWeiland Agreed. However, because this battle (and all other cultural battles) have been commissioned to Christians (2 Corinthians 10:3-6), it is especially relevant that they stop using the enemy's terminology.
12 months ago on Liberals Use The Word “Choice” To Make Murder Sound Cool!
"Be ye therefore very courageous to keep and to do all that is written in the book of the law of Moses, that ye turn not aside therefrom to the right hand or to the left; that ye come not among these nations, these that remain among you; neither make mention of the name of their gods, nor cause to swear by them, neither serve them, nor bow yourselves unto them:" (Joshuah 23:6-7)
"Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." (John 14:6)
Greek word "brephos" employed in the New Testament for infants
already born is the same word used for infants in the womb (Luke 2:12 and
Luke 1:41), without specifying the precise moment they became a "brephos."
Therefore, our only option is to then accept that they became such at
conception. Thus, intentionally killing a brephos at any point is
"brephocide" or, more properly, infanticide.
"Words are extremely important because they are our most effective way to
convey meaning, to describe the world around us and to describe what we
believe to be the truth. The scary part about words is that they can be
twisted to disguise something ugly and disgusting as something mundane
and possibly even beautiful."
The same is true for the word "abortion." The
battle against this atrocity begins with identifying it correctly. By calling
it "abortion," we've already acquiesced to the opposition's
terminology. Look up "abortion" and "miscarriage" in any
dictionary. A miscarriage is an abortion. What doctors (and parents) do to
infants in the womb is infanticide. Had Roe v. Wade been waged over infanticide
rather than abortion, it would have never made it to the court room. In fact,
by employing the word "abortion," Roe v. Wade was won before it ever
got to court.
The point being, we Christians need to stop using the non-Christians'
watered-down, politically correct terms such as "abortion" and
"gay." It's infanticide and sodomy. There is no power in the former
terms against evil and our first mistake is in acquiescing to the ungodly's
terminology.For more on this, listen to Part 1 of "Word Wars & Captive
Thoughts" at http://www.missiontoisrael.org/tapelist.php#T849.
Let's see if I have this correct: possible accidental inadvertent bullets meant to save children's lives are far worse than intentional bullets meant to kill children's lives!?!
12 months ago on [VIDEO] Arkansas school arming teachers with 9mm handguns
"...although the First Amendment does not allow for establishing one religion over another, by eliminating Christianity as the federal government’s religion of choice (achieved by Article 6's interdiction against Christian test oaths), Amendment 1 authorized
equality for all non-Christian and even antichristian religions. When
the Constitution failed to recognize Christian monotheism, it allowed
Amendment 1 to fill the void by authorizing pagan polytheism.
"Amendment 1 did exactly what the
framers proclaimed it could not do: it prohibited the exercise of
monotheistic Christianity (except within the confines of its church
buildings) and established polytheism in its place. This explains the
government’s double standard regarding Christian and non-Christian
religions. For example, court participants entering the United States
District Court of Appeals for the Middle District of Alabama must walk
by a statue of Themis, the Greek goddess of justice. And yet, on
November 18, 2002, this very court ruled that Judge Roy Moore’s Ten
Commandments Monument violated the First Amendment’s Establishment
Clause. Despite many Christians’ protests against this hypocrisy, it was
in keeping with the inevitable repercussions of the First Amendment....
hang their religious hat on Amendment 1, as if some great moral
principle is carved therein. They have gotten so caught up in the battle
over the misuse of the Establishment Clause – the freedom from religion – that they have overlooked the ungodliness intrinsic in the Free Exercise Clause – the freedom of religion [i.e., First Commandment violations]...."
Excerpted from "Amendment 1: Government-Sanctioned Polytheism" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/biblelaw-constitutionalism-pt11.html.
1 year ago on Can the 3rd Amendment Save Us from the NSA?
Constitutionalists often point out that the phrase 'separation of church and
state' is found in the Constitution of the USSR, not the Constitution of the
United States. This is true. Nevertheless, the mandate for separation of church
and state is inherent in Article 6 on two levels: 1) The Constitution is
declared to be the supreme law of the land, which makes any law (secular or
Biblical) contrary to this 'supreme law' null and void and non-executable by
the Constitutional Republic, 2) Religious qualifications for government
officials are denied, which prohibits Biblical qualifications [as the standard for civil rulers]....
can debate the intent of the framers, but we cannot debate the effect:
Christendom became merely Christianity – salt that lost its savor and good for
nothing but to be trampled under the foot of non-Christians. American
Christians have been under the boot of non-Christians and antichrists ever
since 1788. We will continue to be the trampled until finally we throw off the
current secular government and erect a government based exclusively upon
from "Article 6: The Supreme Law of the Land?" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/biblelaw-constitutionalism-pt9.html.
@arctific @TedRWeiland Governance doesn't have a chance in hell to being close to perfect when based upon the fickle traditions of man that are antithetical to Yahweh's perfect law and altogether righteous judgments (Psalm 19:7-11). What do you think provides us the best chance of doing it right(eous): Man's capricious immorality or Yahweh's immutable morality as codified in their respective laws?
@arctific @TedRWeiland I'm sorry I will not and cannot defend what is an unequivocal violation of the First Commandment because it "provides me the freedom" to practice my Christianity--that is, within the four walls of my house or church building!
How do you think Yahweh views the First Amendment. Think about it: Since the First Amendment was ratified America has been transformed from what was predominately a monotheistic Christian nation in the 1600s and early 1700s to most polytheistic nation to exist (with all the trimmings), with the possible exception of the Roman Empire.
@arctific I would furthermore caution going to far with "making the most of tools we have." A prostitute could say the same. Nadab and Abihu were condemned and killed for using "tools" not sanctioned by Yahweh.
It's time Christians look beyond their own generation and to their posterity's and their posterity's posterity's generation and start doing what is best for them rather than trying to save what cannot be saved by what was conceived in sedition against Yahweh (even if unknowingly).
@arctific @TedRWeiland Thanks for responding. There's much in what you say. However, I take exception to "it's the free exercise of religion that enables me to keep the highest commandment." Think about this statement and I think you will see that it makes the highest commandment subservient to Amendment 1 provision for the freedom of religion had enabled polytheism to thrive in America.
We are responsible for keeping the Greatest and the First Commandment regardless whether government says were free to so or not.
Anyone who puts their faith in any part of the Constitution to save them from anything is demonstrating that it is indeed our national idol. Such faith is misplaced as proven by the last 225 years of the Constitutional Republic's rule. As early as the mid-1800s, Libertarian attorney Lysander Spooner (1808-1887) wrote that the
Constitution “has either authorized such a government as we have had, or
has been powerless to prevent it.” (Lysander Spooner, No Treason, No. 7, The Constitution of No Authority)
Where America finds herself today is precisely what anti-federalist like Patrick Henry forecast would come of the Constitution. In fact, nearly all of the anti-federalists' predictions have come true. Whereas none of the federalists predictions have been realized. Why? Simple. The framers failed to expressly establish government and society upon Yahweh's immutable morality as codified in His perfect law.
Our faith needs to be in our Creator and Savior and then demonstrated in our obedience to His law rather than man's fickle traditions (Matthew 15:6-9).
For more regarding how His moral law applies today, see "Law and Kingdom: Their Relevance Under the New Covenant" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/law-kingdomFrame.html.
"The rich rules over the poor, and the borrower becomes the lender's slave." (Proverbs 22:7)
principle of this proverb should also be applied to what
our children are "borrowing" from liberal intelligentsia!
Christians who send heir children to the heathen to be educated is tantamount to the Old Testament Israelites sending their children to the Canaanites to be schooled.
1 year ago on Savings! A “Solution” To College Debt? Or To Everything?
And the numbers will only get better, the more liberals murder their posterity. Those they let live are being dumbed down in our public school system. Consequently, Christians should not get discouraged but take heart, knowing the time's coming for our posterity when Christians will once again rule (like in 1600 America when the Colonials established governments of, by, and for Yahweh based upon His immutable morality as codified in His commandments, statutes, and judgments).
For more concerning ruling and reigning in and on behalf of Christ, see free online book "Law and Kingdom: Their Relevance Under the New Covenant" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/law-kingdomFrame.html.
1 year ago on Polls Indicate That Pro-Abortion People are Killing Themselves Off
@RobertAlexander @TedRWeiland @Chris Lee Interesting. How about my replacement to Chris?
1 year, 1 month ago on You Don't Need Government's Permission To Obey God
@Chris Lee @TedRWeiland Scroll up or down; it's there.
The Scripture reference in my original post in the last paragraph should be 1 Corinthians 11:14.
The Scripture reference should be 1 Corinthians 11:14.
That should be 1 Corinthians 11:14.
Another great quote is "Any dead fish can flow with a current, it takes a live fighting one to swim upstream!" God bless Matt Birk for fulfilling the following:
"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them." (Ephesians 5:11)
1 year, 1 month ago on NFL Player Slams Obama For “God Bless Planned Parenthood.”
We just celebrated Memorial Day, which is a commemoration of the loss of life and limb
in what have been, for the most part, ungodly military campaigns on behalf of
America's imperialistic military-industrial complex, at the behest of the
New World Order International bankers. Because Yahweh, the God of the Bible, promises victory
and no casualties when a nation is in obedience to Him and conducts warfare
according to His law, Memorial Day is, therefore, a celebration of our
disobedience to Yahweh.
"...The power to declare war is a serious responsibility.
Why were the framers so vague in defining the parameters of war and the
conditions under which it could be declared? Section 8, Clause 11 is the
only place of significance where warfare is mentioned in the
Constitution. Little wonder this power has been abused. Luther Martin [one of Maryland's delegates to the Constitutional Convention]
'…the congress have also a power given them to raise and support armies, without any limitation as to numbers, and without any restriction in time of peace. Thus, sir, this plan of government, instead of guarding against a standing army, that engine of arbitrary power, which has so often and so successfully been used for the subversion of freedom, has in its formation given it an express and constitutional sanction….' (Luther Martin, Jonathan Elliott, ed., The Debates in the Several State Conventions, on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, 4 vols. (Washington, DC: Jonathan Elliott, 1836) vol. 1, p. 40.)
John Quincy Adams predicted the consequences of America’s international military entanglements:
'America … has abstained
from interference in the concerns of others, even when the conflict has
been for principles to which she clings…. Wherever the standard of
freedom and independence has been or shall be unfurled, there will her
heart, her benedictions, and her prayers be. But she goes not abroad in
search of monsters to destroy.… She well knows that by once enlisting
under other banners than her own, were they even the banners of foreign
independence, she would involve herself beyond the power of extrication,
in all the wars of interest and intrigue, of individual avarice, envy
and ambition, which assume the colors, and usurp the standard of
freedom. The fundamental maxims of her policy would insensibly change
from liberty to force; the frontlet on her brow would no
longer beam with the ineffable splendor of freedom and independence; but
in its stead would soon be substituted an imperial diadem, flashing in
false and tarnished luster, the murky radiance of dominion and power.
She might become the dictatress of the world: she would be no longer the
ruler of her own spirit.' ( John Quincy Adams, quoted in William H. Seward, Life and Public Services of John Quincy Adams (New York, NY: C.M. Saxton, Barker & Co., 1860) p. 132.)
"Because the framers provided no Biblical parameters, unbiblical warfare has been the rule ever since...."
For more, see online Chapter 4 "Article 1: Legislative Usurpation" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/biblelaw-constitutionalism-pt4.html.
1 year, 1 month ago on Is Rand Paul Right About Jesus And War?
Charles Caleb Colton said: “Corruption is like a ball of snow, once it’s set a rolling, it must increase.”
Corruption of WHAT?
If you agree with Isaiah 33:22 and James 4:12 that declare Yahweh is the exclusive
legislator and that, therefore, He is the only one with
the authority to determine what is good and what is evil (or corrupt), then corruption can only be defined as what makes good evil and evil good (Isaiah 5:20).
That said, I would then ask: WHEN did this corruption begin in America? It's genesis was the framers' failure to establish government upon Yahweh's immutable morality as codified in His triune law (His commandments, statutes, and judgments). Because the framers failed in this regard, it was inevitable we would end up with the corrupt government we have today, including things such as the IRS scandal. In fact, under government of, by, and for Yahweh, there would be no IRS or Federal Reserve. For that matter, there would be no Obama as President.
For more, on how Yahweh's moral law applies today, see online book "Law and Kingdom: Their Relevance Under the New Covenant" at bibleversusconstitution.org/law-kingdomFrame.html. Also, don't miss our Constitution Survey in the right-hand sidebar.
1 year, 1 month ago on America Is Suffering Political Blood Poisoning With The IRS Scandal
@JoelJollymore @The real Smart Guy Any many who denies Christ's divinity, as Jefferson did to the end, is and antichrist according to the Apostle John, and anyone who condones such a man becomes a partaker in his deeds--2 John 1:7-11.
1 year, 2 months ago on Drug Screening: Can Liberals Act Logically?
@NWProgressive@The real Smart Guy@TedRWeilandDon't forget the Declaration was written by antichrist Jefferson, who who cut the virgin birth, miracles, resurrection, and ascension of
Christ – what he described as a “dunghill” – out of his cut-and-paste
New Testament. Therefore, according to 2 John 1:7-9, whatever god he was referring to was not Yahweh, the God of the Bible. The generic god-language of the Declaration is typical of the Enlightenment and the Masons.
@The real Smart Guy @TedRWeiland I think you need to go back and carefully read my post, particularly the second paragraph and the date 1600. I agree with you regarding the Treaty of Tripoli, but it was referring to the government of the United States of America. The United States of America didn't exist in the 1600s.
Of course, this is a Band-Aide on what is a much more consequential problem--called socialist theft, which no one in government today is immune from. Whether Democrats or Republicans, it's just a matter of degrees. But stealing is stealing is stealing. And stealing is a violation of the Eighth Commandment, which the framers failed to expressly establish government on. Thus, it was inevitable we would end up with a bunch of thieves (and worse) running this country, on both the federal and state level.
Time to get back to our true 1600 Christian roots when the Colonials established governments of, by, and for Yahweh based upon His immutable righteousness as codified in His commandments, statutes, and judgments instead of a humanistic government of, by, and for the people based upon the fickle traditions of finite man (Matthew 15:6-9).
Find out how much you really know about the Constitution as compared to the Bible, take our Constitution Survey at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/ConstitutionSurvey.html and receive a free copy of the 85-page "Primer" of the 565-page "Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective."
is only one answer for the Islaminization of America, and it's not what most
people think it is. Listen to "The BIBLICAL Answer to the Islaminization
of America" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/tapelist.html#T871,
followed by "The BIBLICAL Answer to the Mosque at Ground Zero" at T 872.
1 year, 2 months ago on Maryland Blessed With $100 Million Turkish Mega-Mosque
@lambsevYou're correct. His own pastors at First Church did not consider him a Christian. He was a Mason in all regards, in fact, a Worshipful Master when inaugurated President, with his hand on a Bible taken from one of the local Masonic Temples.
For a balanced approach to the late 17th-century key founders' religious beliefs (they were neither Deists in the purest sense of the word, nor were they Christians in the Biblical sense of the word), see Dr. Albert Mohler's interview with Dr. Gregg Frazer. Google for either the audio interview or a transcript of the same.
Dr. Mohler is President of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and Dr. Frazer is Professor of History at the Master's College in California.
After reading the interview, ask yourself what kind of document and government such men could have created. If you're interested in the answer, take our Constitution Survey at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/ConstitutionSurvey.html and receive a free copy of the 85-page "Primer" of 565-page "Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective."
1 year, 2 months ago on George Washington Bore A Cross – Obama Thinks He Wears A Crown
@BobE @TedRWeiland @Greg137 Now, you're misinterpreting my mail to Greg. When will you ever learn!?!
1 year, 2 months ago on Media: Preying In Public School Should Be Legal
@BobE @TedRWeiland @Greg137 There you go misinterpreting someone else's mail again.
@BobE @TedRWeiland @Greg137 Proverbs 26:4
@Greg137 Greg, Bob's been reading our mail (the Bible, most of which are epistles written to Christians) again. Consequently, he's, of course, clueless as to the correct interpretation for what's not intended for him (unless, he repents and surrenders his life to Christ.)
The passage he refers to is either Exodus 22:16-17 and Deuteronomy 22:28-29, both of which have to with consensual sex between a man and a virgin. Rape involves kidnapping and, according to Exodus 21:16, kidnapping is a capital crime.
@WolfyJam@TedRWeilandThanks for responding. I think you might enjoy listening to "The BIBLICAL Answer to the Islaminization of America" at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/tapelist.html#T871, followed by "The BIBLICAL Answer to the Mosque at Ground Zero" at T 872.
Time for Americans (Christians in particular) to face up to WHY such things are occurring America. The reason is BECAUSE the late 18th-century framers failed to establish a Christian society based upon Yahweh's immutable morality as codified in His perfect law and altogether righteous judgments (Psalm 19:7-9) like their true 1600 Colonial Christian predecessors did.
If the framers had established government upon Yahweh's commandments, statutes, and judgments (including Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13) there would be no homosexual agenda here in America because no sodomite or lesbian would dare risk petitioning the government for their rights.
Find out how much you REALLY know about the Constitution as compared to the Bible. Take our Constitution Survey at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/ConstitutionSurvey.html and receive a free copy of the 85-page "Primer" of "Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective."
Perhaps Christians will wake up now to the fact that they shouldn't be employed by the imperialistic, military-industrial complex to do the murdering of the international bankers in the first place.
Before someone accuses me of being a pacifist. I believe self-defense and protection of our families (and our neighbors) is not a right but a God-expected responsibility:
"But if anyone does not provide for his own, and especially for those of his household [including spiritual and physical protection], he has denied the faith, and is worse than an unbeliever. " (1 Timothy 5:8)
I also believe warfare is biblical, provided it's biblical.
1 year, 2 months ago on Military Will Prosecute Christians For Sharing Their Faith
@NancyLaw @TedRWeiland The question I'm asking is not why shouldn't they, but why ARE they here? What's the genesis? It goes much further back than what you might think--think 1791. Perhaps you will find the message I provided the URL to enlightening.
1 year, 3 months ago on Obama Protects Islam At All Costs
@NancyLaw @TedRWeiland Nancy, thank you for responding. But, I didn't ask what's the genesis of Muslim hate here in America, but what's the genesis of Muslims here in America?
What is the genesis of the Muslims here in America? Until we address the reason they're here, we'll never see this problem eliminated. There
is only one answer for the Islaminization of America, and it's not what most
people think it is. Listen to "The BIBLICAL Answer to the Islaminization
of America" at http://www.missiontoisrael.org/tapelist.php#T871,
followed by "The BIBLICAL Answer to the Mosque at Ground Zero" at #T872.
@Kate4 So, in other words, you believe in selective murder, making yourself God by determining yourself what is good and evil. May Yahweh help you see your error and repent of your idolatry and promotion of infanticide!
1 year, 3 months ago on Gosnell Trial Reveals Truth About Abortion