Showtime_3233
- 25 comments
- 4 likes given
- 17 likes received
Bio not provided
Anyone know the difference/why some have the full logo on the heel(these) and the ones with just the two lines(sulfurs)?
but the shape does look like the 2000 so idk
aren't those the og 5s, the ogs had the rounded teeth on the side opposed to the sharp teeth that were used on the 2000 to present.
Example: http://www.sneakerfiles.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/air-jordan-5-retro-black-metallic-2000.jpg
@dsuaveallday think theyre just showing it because of the new ebay listing, but i do remember seeing these before
$100 @seattle_Superchronics
how many damn pictures do they need?
dumb ass people thinking this is a real shoe, its just a joke guys
@JManSam the insole has Nike Air, theshoegame.com has more pictures and it does have it on the insoles. Wonder if this is a sample and the released will have it on the outsole too who knows
Never understood the "retro too soon" movement. If you truly believe that you buy a shoe because you like it and don't care how many other people have it or how limited it is than in theory you would want an infinite supply of releases so that you can walk into a store and find any jordan you want.
@EzLVKicks23 Well Idk how far into the comparison between performance you can go because obviously they didn't have the technology we have today such as hyperfuse and fly wire and stuff like that. Abx as far as how they look off court is kind of irrelevant because when it boils down to it, all basketball shoes whether it be Jordan's, lebrons kd's and droses they are and always will be meant for basketball. Recent retros by jb are no longer meant for basketball bit you have to think when either a Jordan or a lebron originally came out they were built around performance because the player actually had to wear them for a full season.
And I'm not taking any one side I'm just saying
@EEzLVKicks23 I get what you're saying cause I feel the same way as far as his achievements but for the purpose of this question, purely aesthetically, it is closer than a lot of people think.
@EzLVKicks23 @Showtime_3233 exactly. This poll is a little bias because of the people's views on lebron. I'm not saying that this is true for everybody but if Jordan wore lebron and lebron wore Jordan's most people would still vote for jordan
The argument that Jordans are classic is irrelevant for two reasons. LeBron is still playing and his shoes haven't had enough time to become "classics." Second, the fact that a shoe is classic doesn't make it look any better. It may have a personal connection to you but it doesn't make it physically look any better.
If you watch the commercials you can see the team the Mysitcs, (last picture they show in the commercial) and thats what the black and baby blue pair is, idk the name of the player though
@Dev_gov it should be about what you like, not what we like, not trying to sound like a dick but just sayin
@abe_thegreat @JFresh_136 its not the fuel band its just the chips that you put in the shoe to use Nike + technology. If you already have that stuff from a previous shoe then you buy the 200 but if you want them and dont have them you pay 270
@heat_meiser @RichEightyNineWatkins wouldnt have seen it if he didnt point it out before haha.
@heat_meiser @RichEightyNineWatkins right under his right foot in between the 6s and 7s