Livefyre Profile

Activity Stream

It's not logic.  It's intuition.  Logic considers ALL the issues while intuition goes with a gut feeling.   The stats below show that fast teams had fewer injuries in 2012 than the slow teams did.


Top 20 ‘Fast’ Teams in FBS Football 2012
Average Plays per Game: 83.12
Total Starts Lost to Injury: 143
Average Number of Starts Lost Per Team: 7.15
Average Starts Lost per Play: .086

Top 20 ‘Slow’ Teams in FBS Football 2012
Average Plays per Game: 65.85
Total Starts Lost to Injury: 151
Average Number of Starts Lost Per Team: 7.55
Average Starts Lost per Play: .115


http://cfbmatrix.com/portfolio/speed-may-kill-but-slow-gets-you-hurt/gallery/daves-faves/


If you are conditioned better, your injury rate per play will go down.  That could be one reason that fast teams experience fewer injuries.  Also, the faster teams may get more 1 on 1 plays which may lead to few injuries.  The smash mouth style of play that power teams use, could lead to more injuries.  I could go on and on.  Blaming injuries on fast play is not logical at all because it does not take into account other issues, and as the stats above show, the other issues may actually be more important than the number of plays.


Really care about injuries?  Lower the number of games played back to 11.

6 months, 3 weeks ago on SEC Football Coaches “Structure” An Attack On Proposed Slowdown Rule

Reply

Here's an interesting note on injuries from 2012 and comparing the top 20 fastest playing teams to the 20 slowest playing teams..


Top 20 ‘Fast’ Teams in FBS Football 2012
Average Plays per Game: 83.12
Total Starts Lost to Injury: 143
Average Number of Starts Lost Per Team: 7.15
Average Starts Lost per Play: .086

Top 20 ‘Slow’ Teams in FBS Football 2012
Average Plays per Game: 65.85
Total Starts Lost to Injury: 151
Average Number of Starts Lost Per Team: 7.55
Average Starts Lost per Play: .115


The slower teams had more missed starts, more injuries per play, and more total injuries than did the fast teams.  


http://cfbmatrix.com/speed-may-kill-but-slow-gets-you-hurt/


The rate of injury per play may go down when the game is played faster.  There are some reasons that this counter-intuitive situation could occur (conditioning and playing style are just two.)


A good study would be interesting.  I am just not convinced that more plays by a HUNH team automatically equals more injuries.

7 months, 1 week ago on Auburn’s Malzahn (No Surprise) Opposes Potential Rule Change To Slow Down Offenses

Reply

@John at MrSEC @Mark1984    I think you missed a point I was trying to make.  Perhaps being conditioned well enough, and having the speed to play fast, makes one less injury prone.  Thus, more plays by those that play the HUNH game doesn't necessarily mean more injuries (i.e. a higher injury rate) than those that play a more power oriented game.  Collisions by big strong people cause injuries.  If you play fast, and have the other team winded, it's harder for them to get a strong hit on you.  


It is a false premise to simply say more plays equals more injuries when comparing a HUNH team to a power team.  There's more to it than that.  More plays can (and will) mean more injuries if all things stay equal.  But all things are not the same.  More plays by a power team would result in more injuries than more plays by a finesse team, IMO.  A HUNH may run more plays and each play for that team will mean more injuries.  HOWEVER, (and it's a big however), because of their conditioning, style of play, type of players, etc. they may still have a lower injury rate per play than a power team.  IOW, HUNH may actually lower the number of injuries per play as compared to the power teams.  It would be an interesting study.  You can't simply stick with "more plays by a HUNH team means more total injuries than fewer plays by a power team would".  It's a logical fallacy to make that comparison.  More plays run by two HUNH teams would mean more injuries for those teams.  But if HUNH teams have better conditioning, smaller but quicker players, etc. their rate of injury per play may actually go way down compared to the power teams.  Thus, more plays by a HUNH team could still result in fewer injuries than what power teams experience even though they run fewer plays.  The injury rate per game could be higher for the power teams.
I'll see if I can find a link that compares some injuries from HUNH teams with that of other teams and post it later.
(That said, when a team can take advantage of the rules as currently written, that's smart coaching.  I still don't get the gimmick comment when coaches are winning with it.  One doesn't make it to the MNC game because of a gimmick.)

7 months, 1 week ago on Auburn’s Malzahn (No Surprise) Opposes Potential Rule Change To Slow Down Offenses

Reply

More plays doesn't mean more risk of injury John.  That's a faulty  premise.  (I am pretty sure Auburn had fewer injuries last year than UGA or Florida.)  All things being equal, your premise would be right.  But not all things are equal.  For instance, if you are playing against a faster team, you need to put more speed and less beef on the field.  Faster players typically are not as big or as strong ergo, they don't often hit so as to "break" something.  (Momentum does include speed and mass so there's give an take there.)   Also, one should consider the type of conditioning the faster teams go through.  Maybe that has an impact.


Now, if you play 50 plays in one game, and you as a person play 100 plays the next game against the same exact players, that run the same kind of plays then you are right.  The risk of injury goes up.  But when you change the type of plays called, the type of offense, the type of players, etc. you can't just say that it is logic dictates more injuries will occur.  That's not sound reasoning.  One has to include all the elements involved.  To go back to your car analogy... If one person drives in NY city and another drives on the long lonely roads of Montana, do you think the accident rate per mile will be the same?  They won't be because the conditions matter.  Add in snow or sleet, or freezing rain in one location and it will skew even further.  


I still don't get the "gimmick" moniker.  The coaches that have run this system know they have an advantage in conditioning and want to use it.  How is that different than someone that has a great back and runs the ball more?  Or a great QB and uses him?  Or three fantastic WR and decides to throw more?  If you are bigger and stronger than I am, then I will plan on getting you winded so I can win at the end.  If I wear you out, that's a strategy not a gimmick.  Gimmick may be one play.  But when it is used as a strategy to beat bigger, more talented teams, not sure why it's a gimmick instead of a strategy.


I think the quote "I don't want to see 59-42 SEC championship games" might be more relevant.  I prefer low scoring games simply because every possession matters.  It's like a 1-0 baseball game.  Every pitch could be the difference in the game so you it keeps your attention.  An 11-10 game one doesn't worry about missing an out or two.  So yea, it's more entertaining when the game is close and the offenses aren't scoring almost every possession.  But that doesn't mean that the HUNH is bad for the game.  Others like a high scoring game.  



7 months, 1 week ago on Auburn’s Malzahn (No Surprise) Opposes Potential Rule Change To Slow Down Offenses

Reply

Here's an article that shows how the top 20 fast teams last year had less injuries than the top 20 slow teams did.  Perhaps the better conditioning the fast teams have to have, works to their advantage in the injury department.


http://cfbmatrix.com/speed-may-kill-but-slow-gets-you-hurt/


From the article....


Top 20 ‘Fast’ Teams in FBS Football 2012
Average Plays per Game: 83.12
Total Starts Lost to Injury: 143
Average Number of Starts Lost Per Team: 7.15
Average Starts Lost per Play: .086

Top 20 ‘Slow’ Teams in FBS Football 2012
Average Plays per Game: 65.85
Total Starts Lost to Injury: 151
Average Number of Starts Lost Per Team: 7.55
Average Starts Lost per Play: .115

7 months, 2 weeks ago on Ole Miss’ Freeze Not Happy With NCAA Proposal To Slow The Game; But The NCAA Should Do Just That

Reply

@John at MrSEC  Curious... have you looked to see how many injuries occurred in the NUNH games as opposed to those that didn't have HUNH as one of the teams?  Then to break it down even more, how many occurred when the HUNH offense was on the field?  Would be interesting to see how many occurred with the HUNH offense on the field and see what the per minute rate was for injuries.


UGA and Florida had tons of injuries last year and neither of those teams run the HUNH.  Most of UGA's injuries occurred against teams that don't run the HUNH.  Not sure about UF though.  Also, UGA's biggest injuries, and most of them, occurred on offense and they don't run the HUNH.


Even so, would you be for getting rid of kickoff since so many injuries occur on that play?  (I know I would but many wouldn't.)  Also, for the record, I see HUNH as a strategy and not a gimmick and my team doesn't run it.  It's innovation in the same way the West Coast offense was innovative.

7 months, 2 weeks ago on Ole Miss’ Freeze Not Happy With NCAA Proposal To Slow The Game; But The NCAA Should Do Just That

Reply

There's a difference between a gimmick and a strategy.  A gimmick might be something like the fumblerooski.  But a strategy is how the game is played and has a reason behind it that impacts the overall arch of the game.  Fast pace offenses are based in strategy and not gimmickry.  Why change the rules because a teams strategy doesn't fit with your desires and preferences?  What changes the game for worse, are generally bad rules not strategic innovations.

7 months, 2 weeks ago on Ole Miss’ Freeze Not Happy With NCAA Proposal To Slow The Game; But The NCAA Should Do Just That

Reply

No one forced people to have a phone back in the day either.  They were free to have one or choose not to.  The government still broke up Ma Bell and for good reason.  There is no viable alternative to college football for players right now.  The government should simply force them to compete for players.  They have a practical anti-trust exemption right now.  I suspect when the fallout of the Obanon suit hits, the NCAA will be appealing to congress for an anti-trust exemption.  If they don't get one, you'll see players start making a lot more money.

7 months, 2 weeks ago on Ex-Gamecock Clowney: “I Would Have Probably Stayed In College” If I’d Been Paid

Reply

"Now toss in money and a union and that whole system will change.  It’ll change for the better for the players financially.  But it likely won’t change for the better for anyone else."


Shouldn't it change for the better for the players first and foremost?  If the NCAA can get away with collusion, why is it such a bad thing when the players try the same thing?

8 months ago on A Union Would Be Good For College Football Players, But Bad For Most Everyone Else

Reply

Good write up.  SOS deserves praise for his coaching prowess.  You would think between him and Bill Snyder schools would be willing to hire older coaches that have proven track records.  

8 months, 2 weeks ago on Report: Carolina To Bump Spurrier’s Pay To $4 Million

Reply

Hard to see how WKU became a "chump" with Petrino.  With the buy out clause, they ended up making a few hundred thousand dollars on the hire.  Plus, they went 8-4 and beat UK.  They avoided the embarrassing off field troubles that hit all the other programs.  And they avoided the eventual shambles that come with bad recruiting.  IMO, WKU won with this hire.  Hard to see a bad side for WKU when all things are considered, IMO.  Because it was a fast turn around, they got the best and avoided the worst.

8 months, 3 weeks ago on Louisville Destined To Be Burned Again By Petrino

Reply

I think the targeting rule is having an impact as well.  It's not only giving teams more first downs via penalty, and taking out a good defender when it's called.  It's also changing the way DBs (safeties in particular) and LBs are hitting receivers across the middle of the field.  Those hits use to go a long way towards keeping Os in check.  

11 months ago on SEC Stats: The League’s Defenses Much Worse Than Last Year

Reply

@John at MrSEC John, I saw your post but now I can't find it.  I'll try to clarify... The SEC and the NCAA are about money.  You readily admit in your post that no conference would suspend a kid (i.e. Dial) for the championship game even if he deserved it.  The reason they won't do that, is the same reason they protect that team late in the regular season.  Sometimes, they can't completely do it.  But again, I still wait for a study on game changing penalties instead of hiding behind stats that look at all penalties the same.  They are not all the same.  More likely what we will find is a home field advantage for all teams.  But, until the Dials of the world are suspended, we can all acknowledge the conferences are protecting their champions.

11 months, 1 week ago on Refs From Georgia / Vandy Game Could Face Discipline

Reply

So you are admitting that Bama gets special treatment from the NCAA.  We agree.  Why do you think the NCAA would give them special treatment but not the SEC and not the refs?

11 months, 1 week ago on Nixon’s Pardon, Timing And The Real Reason Miami and Missouri’s Haith Got Off Lightly

Reply

@John at MrSEC @Mark1984 That's why people believe there is favoritism to those (or that) team(s) at the top.  If they won't suspend a kid for the championship game, then they aren't going to suspend a kid for a game that might keep a team out of the championship game.  It's favoritism at its worst.  With Dial, the committee recommended he be suspended.  But safety only goes so far with the SEC I suppose.  What they are saying is "So long as it doesn't cost us a championship, we'll suspend a kid".  We need some consistency.

Mr. Slive has already indicated that he wants the penalty overturned if the suspension is overturned.  We'll see that even if a bigger game isn't influenced.

I don't buy it about the roles being reversed if UGA was going to the game.  We see it with Bama a lot.  The statistics you quote in other articles often ignore the game changing circumstances with penalties.  At the end of the year, this penalty will just be another stat to look at it, but the timing, and result cost a game.  It's not the same as the one that UGA got earlier with Drew.  Penalties can't be looked at statistically to see bias, IMO.  Look at impact and effect.  Then I will be convinced that the SEC doesn't protect the BCS bound schools, and especially Bama, most of the time.


11 months, 1 week ago on Refs From Georgia / Vandy Game Could Face Discipline

Reply

That last penalty against UGA gave Vandy a first down after UGA stopped them on 4th.  It was a game changing play and cost UGA the game.  Sure there were other plays that cost UGA the game too.  But get that call right in real time, and UGA wins.

Wonder how big a deal it would be if something similar cost Bama a shot at a MNC.   We know the SEC didn't suspend Dial last year after the committee recommended a suspension.  

11 months, 1 week ago on Refs From Georgia / Vandy Game Could Face Discipline

Reply

Here's an interesting blog note about that from the Senator.  Saban had an interesting advantage because of a former Ole Miss coach that was in the Bama coaching booth during the game.  I agree with the premise of your article, just thought this was an interesting add on.

http://blutarsky.wordpress.com/2013/09/30/you-dont-want-to-anger-nick-saban-son/

1 year ago on Ole Miss QB Wallace Talked, Alabama Simply Played

Reply

Explain the Dial situation last year.  The committee recommended that Dial should have been suspended for his hit on Murray but he was not.  He didn't even get flagged.  I could buy that in the heat of the moment, the ref was not watching, missed it, flubbed the play, etc.  But after the committee recommended suspending him and the SEC didn't...

1 year, 1 month ago on Uh, Let’s Just Say Bama Is Disciplined, When It Comes To Penalties

Reply

Coach Miles is not being inconsistent.  He's saying exactly what every competitor and athlete feels.  When you look at the overall picture, it's not a fair schedule.  However, when Florida week comes around, LSU is amped up and ready to play and looking forward to the game.  Both statements are true.  

1 year, 2 months ago on Miles Says “Bring It On” Regarding Schedule: “I Like Us In Every Game”

Reply

It's nobody's business why Manziel left the camp early except for those directly involved in the situation.

1 year, 2 months ago on Bama’s McCarron Can Expect Manziel Questions Tomorrow

Reply

One of the problems with studies like this is it ignores when the penalties occurred and what kind of penalties occurred.  A flag at the right/wrong time and for the right/wrong distance can change a game.  Those are the kind of issues that fans notice and fuss about.

1 year, 3 months ago on 5 Years Of Penalties: Which Teams Get More Flags On The Road Than At Home?

Reply

 @Flash  @bigredballer

 Also, basketball players know how to catch the ball.  Soft hands.  You can't play basketball if you can't catch.

1 year, 7 months ago on Monday Recruiting Thread 04-Feb-13 | February | 2013 Articles

Reply

 @bigredballer

 The only way they can sign more than 25 is to back count them to last year and that only happens with EE's.  So 25 should be the max they can sign on wednesday.

1 year, 7 months ago on Saturday Recruiting Thread 02-Feb-13 | January | 2013 Articles

Reply

 @bigredballer

 They can't sign more than 25 LOIs on Wednesday.  That's the SEC limit regardless of how many you have open on the 85 limit.  Depending on how many EE's they had, it could be even less unless those EE's count towards last year.  Grey shirting only helps with the 85 overall limit because they can sign and count towards next year, which will actually lower the number of ships below 25 by the number of grey shirts.

1 year, 7 months ago on Saturday Recruiting Thread 02-Feb-13 | January | 2013 Articles

Reply

 @RakkasandawgDepth.  In the 2nd half against Bama, our guys were winded.  We need more bodies.

 

1 year, 8 months ago on Thursday Recruiting Thread 31-Jan-13 | January | 2013 Articles

Reply

 @bigredballer  @Raddawg

 All one needs to do is compare his twitter feed while he was at Bama with his twitter feed while he was at UGA. 

1 year, 8 months ago on Sunday Recruiting Thread 27-Jan-13 | January | 2013 Articles

Reply

@nickmac6 Thanks Nick.  It's a tough site to navigate.  You have to jump around too much to keep up.  Plus,. I had to create a account in order to see the posts. 

1 year, 8 months ago on Saturday Recruiting Thread 26-Jan-13 | January | 2013 Articles

Reply

 @nickmac6

 what is his blog's url?

1 year, 8 months ago on Saturday Recruiting Thread 26-Jan-13 | January | 2013 Articles

Reply

He was double teame some.  Looks like his momentum was used against him a good bit too.  Also, it looked like the center was able to get some leverage on him because he center was shorter and able to get into his chest. 

1 year, 8 months ago on Film study: Jonathan Jenkins vs. Alabama | January | 2013 Articles

Reply

 @bigredballer  @Mark1984  I agree it's not a violation for the recruit to give the information.  The reason I mentioned it is the article makes it sound like the info is coming from Bobo.  Perhaps I am being paranoid.  :-) For instance "Bobo doesn't handle ... but he says" makes it sound like Bobo said it to the article writer.  Like I said, I am probably just being paranoid.  Enjoying your site so far.

1 year, 8 months ago on 01-15-2013 Tuesday Recruiting Thread (Laremy Tunsil Update)

Reply

If Bobo said anything about DW, then that is a recruiting violation.  Might want to change your wording.

1 year, 8 months ago on 01-15-2013 Tuesday Recruiting Thread (Laremy Tunsil Update)

Reply

 @ChevyDawg82  @Dawgholio

 Keep in mind that Murphy did his thing before steroids became an issue.  He was 20th or so on the all time home run list when he retired.  Add to that the gold glove awards, MVPs, etc.  I don't really understand why he is not already in the hall of fame.

1 year, 8 months ago on Wednesday Recruiting Thread 09-Jan-13

Reply

 @ecdawg  @deltonadawg

 If they go to a BCS bowl they get to keep all of that money too which brings their total to over 30 million.  That's way more than the teams in the big conferences get.  The money they  make depends on how successful they are as team.  In a conference, there's more stability, less risk, but also less reward.

 

1 year, 8 months ago on Dawg Treats 08-Dec-13

Reply

So Dial said his hit was a clean hit.  Looks like the SEC got their message across loud and clear to Dial.  

1 year, 8 months ago on SEC Headlines 1/6/2013

Reply

So much for internal punishment.  Dial calling his hit on Murray "clean".

 

http://www.al.com/alabamafootball/index.ssf/2013/01/it_was_a_clean_hit_alabamas_qu.html

1 year, 8 months ago on Dawg Treats 06-Jan-13

Reply

 @Socrates = Old Man Line Guy  @ChevyDawg82  @CPAdawg Hybl was one and he started (I think) at Oklahoma.  Cobb was another and I think he started at Auburn.

1 year, 8 months ago on Dawg Treats 06-Jan-13

Reply

I like the rule change.  The kids should be able to transfer far more easily than they do now.

1 year, 8 months ago on New NCAA Transfer Rules?

Reply

 @Socrates = Old Man Line Guy  @Bleudawg  @ecdawg  Yep.  Two advantages CMR always seemed to have at FSU was an experienced QB (rarely did one start till he was a Junior) and those fast, tall WR that could catch everything.  We have both this year and it showed.  Push the opposing D all the time and never back down.

 

1 year, 9 months ago on New Year's Day Recruiting Thread 2013

Reply

 @SEC fan When Sports writers (See article above) state it has to do with the next game, that's a big deal.  It means the SEC is putting reputation, money, etc. above player safety in the eyes of even the journalist.  Not a good day for the SEC office.

1 year, 9 months ago on No Suspension For Bama's Dial Over SEC Title Game Hit On UGA's Murray

Reply

 @randompants IMO, leading with the helmet has nothing to do with intent and everything to do with form.  He made helmet to helmet contact first because he led with his helmet.  He left his feet and I don't think it was the result of being tangled.  He didn't trip, his feet came off the ground prior to being tangled.  

 

That said, yea, it should have been a suspension and the SEC office will have a hard time living this one down.  With Fairly last year and Dial this year, it's a pattern.  Don't want your guy suspended, make sure you are a highly ranked team.  

1 year, 9 months ago on No Suspension For Bama's Dial Over SEC Title Game Hit On UGA's Murray

Reply

 @randompants   Yep.  He led with his helmet and left his feet.  This one will be brought up over and over again.  Every time someone is suspended for "leading with his helmet and launching" this hit will be brought up.  SEC messed up here big time.  

1 year, 9 months ago on No Suspension For Bama's Dial Over SEC Title Game Hit On UGA's Murray

Reply

Yep.  Should have been suspended.  The league will have a very hard time living this one down.  They will reap fan accusations for years to come as a result.  Too bad for the players, officials, and finally too bad for the SEC office.

1 year, 9 months ago on No Suspension For Bama's Dial Over SEC Title Game Hit On UGA's Murray

Reply

If he doesn't get suspended, it will just confirm the SEC is selective in when they enforce the rule based on the team and upcoming opponent.

1 year, 10 months ago on Bama’s Dial “Getting A lot Of Heat” Over Hit On UGA’s Murray, But Will He Get A Suspension?

Reply

 @John at MrSEC  @secfanSC   SOS could have said "I won't give an interview while Morris is in the room"  but you said that wouldn't fly with reporters.  I have no beef with him not taking questions.  Access isn't a right.  (And for the record, I am a life long UGA fan!)

1 year, 12 months ago on UGA's Richt Doesn't Show It If The Media Gets Under His Skin

Reply

Good morning John.  My beef with reporters in this case is the double standard.  Reporters feel like it's OK for them to blast a coach but when that coach fights back, he's wrong.  It's hypocritical.  CMR is a great guy and a great example for many of us.  You won't find him publicly criticizing people very often.  That said, reporters seem to think they have rights that other's don't have.  They don't.  As I've stated before, they have the right to a free press, meaning they can print just about anything (excluding libel, etc.)  But there's no constitutional guarantee for access.

 

Kudos to you for admitting publicly how hard it is to respond gracefully.  

1 year, 12 months ago on UGA's Richt Doesn't Show It If The Media Gets Under His Skin

Reply

 @John at MrSEC  @vehemon John, Does a man have to give up his freedom so that the press can get their answers?  When was the last time the constitution was used to force the president to have a news conference?

 

Mark

1 year, 12 months ago on Doyel: Spurrier Needs To Worry About Coaching, Not The Media

Reply

 @John at MrSEC  @phrogs4ever  You're also saying SOS doesn't have the right to remain silent.  He does.  And he has the right to request changes at the paper.  Doesn't mean the paper has to agree to them.

1 year, 12 months ago on Doyel: Spurrier Needs To Worry About Coaching, Not The Media

Reply

 @John at MrSEC  @Mark1984   The press can do anything it wants with it.  USC has just as much freedom to yank access it wants to.  The press is not god to demand access and the right to write anything it wants.  It can write, within reason (no libel, etc.) but access is not a guarantee.  SOS has rights as well and so does USC.

1 year, 12 months ago on Doyel: Spurrier Needs To Worry About Coaching, Not The Media

Reply

I can't believe you would compare a coach refusing to do interviews to a free press.  Morris is free to write anything he wants.  Doesn't mean the coach has to give him access.  It's a silly comparison.

1 year, 12 months ago on Doyel: Spurrier Needs To Worry About Coaching, Not The Media

Reply

(I'm a life long UGA fan.)  So you are comparing the president, who rarely, if ever, has a  press conference, who also has a guy that spins the media for the president, to a coach who has to answer questions weekly?  Really?  The media is wrong on this one.  The guy attacked SOS integrity.  It was bad manners and bad reporting   If this is what reporting has come to, why not just write for the national enquiror.

2 years ago on No Speculating: Spurrier Hits Morris With Both Barrels, Says He May “Head To The Beach”

Reply