BuddhaShark
- 14 comments
- 0 likes given
- 5 likes received
Bio not provided
@Nick_II_Quick @10022533 These are the black/white/red 11 lows that are releasing this summer. This is it. No low top version of the playoffs. People saw the color code for these and assumed bred lows were releasing.
@TarHeelsSwag They release two colorways last summer. No one bought them.
These sit on shelves for weeks last year and now they are the most anticipated release of 2013? GTFOHWDBS.
These have already released
@dopeman978 Maybe he likes the shell toes.
Remember leather?
They will not get a return on their investment. Most overrated player in the NBA.
Booooooooooo Volt. Bring back the electric green
@infrared @RyanRoslyn But Nike paid them. Reebok accepted the money. It's not Nike's fault that people buy their stuff over Reebok even if Reebok had the idea. Nike has earned their reputation as the best by being the best. If Reebok accepted the money over an injunction in that case, it was most likely because they thought Nike was offering them more money than they could have made with 100% of the flexible sole running shoe market.
@RyanRoslyn But if Nike truly put in the research and development money and adidas just reverse engineered the shoe, Nike deserves to profit from their investment. If products were not protected in this way, there would be no incentive for any company to develop new technology. As a consumer, I would rather pay a little extra for a new technology than not have new technology at all.
Thor?
Scarfaces were not patent leather.