Livefyre Profile

Activity Stream

> Obviously number 1 is coverage, no brainer.

 

Then why do so many people still sign long-term contracts with some of the worst/lowest coverage carriers?  (Like Sprint and T-Mobile.)

 

Have you seen their 4G LTE maps?

 

 

1 year, 11 months ago on [Editorial] What's Your Main Priority When Choosing A Wireless Carrier?

Reply

Must have LTE 4G.

Must have over 371 markets (5000+ of individual cities) of LTE 4G.

Must have (year after year) the highest customer satisfaction rating in the country.

Must have several top-of-the-line start-of-the-art phones... for $99.  (Like the S3 at Amazon.)

Must have started installing LTE 4G as of 2010.

Must have monthly prices within 10% of the competition.

 

Gee, what a coincidence!  Only Verizon does all of those.

 

1 year, 12 months ago on [Editorial] What's Your Main Priority When Choosing A Wireless Carrier?

Reply

> Every other spec is great.

 

Huh?

No 2gb of usable memory.

Only 8gb of storage.

No quad-core CPU.

On-screen buttons that totally waste the already limited screen-space.

 

Which of those are "great" exactly?

Even older June 2012 devices have better specs.

 

 

2 years ago on Motorola DROID RAZR M 4G LTE Outed Again In Leaked Pictures, And They Call This Mid-range?

Reply

Ugh.  Another of countless tiny 4.3" screens.  This one is even worse:  A portion of the screen space is wasted on the buttons... that could EASILY fit on the bottom edge of the device instead.

 

2 years ago on Motorola DROID RAZR M 4G LTE Outed Again In Leaked Pictures, And They Call This Mid-range?

Reply

> It's actually pretty pathetic how far behind on hardware the iconic iPhone has become...

 

Which is really more embarrassing for Motorola:

 

Motorola made a phone far LESS powerful than the iPhone... and the iPhone greatly outsold it.

Motorola made a phone far MORE powerful than the iPhone... and the iPhone still greatly outsold it.

 

2 years ago on Motorola DROID RAZR M 4G LTE Outed Again In Leaked Pictures, And They Call This Mid-range?

Reply

Sexy?

 

We would be happy if VmWare would stop running 5-6 services on all our machines, 24 hours a day... even though we only use VmWare once a week.

 

Terrible (and totally necessary) design.

 

 

2 years ago on VMworld: VMware Needs To Bring Sexy Back

Reply