Bio not provided
@boodle81 It's more of an irrepressible stench, isn't it?
2 years ago on Air Jordan III ’88 Retro “White/Cement”
@cliffstrong They still say "Jordan" on the bottom - you gonna wear them sh!ts upside down?? What's the difference between a guy buying them because he thinks they look nice and a girl buying them because they look cute? They're both buying them for the way they look... I know for damn sure if I caught a glimpse of them walking along the street I'd rather look up and see that they're attached to a girl.
Sorry, I take all that back. What I meant to say was - keep complaining. Because it's awesome.
All this b!tching and whining about the price - here in Australia the 2011 retro cost $220 - any Jordan retro costs at least $220... And our dollar is better than yours! I'd be happy to be paying only $200 for these. Everyone been complaining for so long about not having a Nike AIR on the back and now that it's there it's just more complaining. If you want them, you got to pay for them. Simple as that.
And the leather quality thing - there's comments I've read here preempting the quality isn't going to be as good as the OGs, but in the same damn comment admitting out they don't have no damn OGs. What the hell you going to compare them to then?
While I'm at it, just wondering when did everyone get too busy/illiterate/lazy to manage to type out "shake my head"? I'm just going to assume that anyone typing smh is no sneakerheard at all, just a little b!tch who's got sand in their panties... Actually it's a pretty funny thing to visualise, all these marfcukas sitting at their computers literally shaking their heads as they type. It would actually be quite difficult... Douches.
2 years ago on “White/Cement” Air Jordan III Retro ’88