Bio not provided
It's evidence to me but apparently not to the judge.
In any case I don't see anything wrong with Samsung going public with it. They have a free speech right to publish their own materials if they wish.
1 year, 12 months ago on Samsung Angers Trial Judge, Releases Rejected Trial Evidence To The Public
Samsung posted their own internal documents that the judge refused to admit as evidence. How is this wrong? If Samsung owns the documents, surely they have the right to release them to the press. Doing so has exposed the judge's bias.
2 years ago on Samsung Angers Trial Judge, Releases Rejected Trial Evidence To The Public