Bio not provided
@ Luke Probably hate him for taking them out of the lottery so they can whiff on yet another prospect.
3 days, 14 hours ago on Monday Bolts – 3.3.14
@L0rv @Air BudNot unless Cleveland could have attracted Bosh and Wade.
@King of Carrot Flowers the third Yeah just replied to that up there. I had forgotten about how awwwwfullll they've been for most of their existence.
3 days, 15 hours ago on Monday Bolts – 3.3.14
@King of Carrot Flowers the third Clippers is good, they're starting to erase that reputation now though.
Knicks, Kings, Cavs, Bobcats... T'Wolves are close.
@King of Carrot Flowers the third Yeah, all time. Not just this season.
@King of Carrot Flowers the third Lakers for this season and last, but historically they're one of the best.
@okcjim They didn't even need to play him. They could have let him go somewhere where he would get playing time, or just let him stay on the roster on the practice squad until the off season.
Who is on the Mount Rushmore of Horribly Ran Clubs in the NBA? Charlotte has to be a contender.
@okcjim Still it seems like a spite move. They weren't going to play him anyway, not like they have any real shot in the postseason.
How messed up is it that the Bobcats buy out Ben Gordon's contract a few hours after the deadline?
@Bryson @Jooseppi@cfountainGreat 3D guy... if he can still play D that is.
2 weeks, 1 day ago on Russell Westbrook a game-time decision against the Heat
@Jooseppi @Bryson@cfountainRemember he was also playing for a terrible Toronto team where there was a logjam at his position.
@Bryson Always liked him... I don't know why he's not on a roster.
@[brooks' fault] @Dubyaexwhizey@Bryson@ThunderBuddyTrue that... if he turned out to be better with your organization you're stuck with an expensive contract with an uncertain future.
@[brooks' fault] @Bryson@Dubyaexwhizey@ThunderBuddyDon't you get bird rights when you trade for him? He was a first rounder so he'd be four years on rookie scale... all you have to do is match another team's offer.
@[brooks' fault] @Dubyaexwhizey@Bryson@ThunderBuddyYeah, definitely. I think the only place that potential has in NBA transactions is in the draft. But yeah, I totally agree that anecdotal arguments are some of the best to have, since there's no real easy answer. You would have to be incredibly confident in the players future ability to trade for them.
@[brooks' fault] @Dubyaexwhizey@Bryson@ThunderBuddySame for your position, though... we're just arguing anecdotally now. I prefer to be positive. If professional shooting coaches are confident in their abilities who am I to argue against them?
@[brooks' fault] @Dubyaexwhizey@Bryson@ThunderBuddyWell if every player played for SA's coaching staff, I bet we would see a lot fewer bad shooters. So that is another variable. I just don't think you can say that because there are bad shooters that some players are just unable to shoot. I've just seen more evidence pointing the other way. Of course that information isn't enough to support my point completely, I think there is more evidence for my position than yours.
@[brooks' fault] @Dubyaexwhizey@Bryson@ThunderBuddyFor every player we could come up with that would be amazing if they could shoot, I could find another that is amazing because they learned to shoot. There are just too many variables, but I'll mention Kawhi again. Even though SA knew he couldn't shoot, they also knew they could teach him to shoot. They MOVED UP in the draft to get him because they were so confident in their abilities to teach. Maybe not every coaching staff is as good as SA's, but that is at least some evidence.