Livefyre Profile

Activity Stream

@GreekGod @DeclanK @hockeyanalysis What they should have done is benched Panik and gone with 7D. Carlyle doesn't use his 4th line anyways. 

5 days, 9 hours ago on Thursday Mashup: Leafs Analytics Tools On Display, Lupul hurt

Reply

NHL.com has an article up about Brock Nelson. It gives me a little more faith in our management if I consider that we were rumored to be trying to trade Reimer for him. That would have been a nice deal, and probably pretty fair for both sides. Nelson probably wouldn't be lighting it up here like he is there, as he gets PP time with Tavares (who is also making Boychuk into a 50 point guy this season, by the looks of things), but he's a solid player. Nice target, if the rumors were true. 

5 days, 9 hours ago on Thursday Mashup: Leafs Analytics Tools On Display, Lupul hurt

Reply

@hockeyanalysis @DeclanK I think Gardiner is an interesting player in that the numbers obviously don't tell the whole story. 

5 days, 9 hours ago on Thursday Mashup: Leafs Analytics Tools On Display, Lupul hurt

Reply

@DeclanK Damn. Just as we're getting rolling on that line. 

5 days, 9 hours ago on Thursday Mashup: Leafs Analytics Tools On Display, Lupul hurt

Reply

It seems pretty clear to me that Carlyle really likes Gardiner. It sounds like he's stuck up for him during the low times, and we know he gives him a ton of minutes to try and redeem himself. In the Pittsburgh game, I believe he led the D in minutes, or was near the top. It's not as though Carlyle is being fickle about his decision here. Gardiner is a good young D, but he was making too many mistakes and reading the play too slowly. The decision to bench him was totally reasonable. 

5 days, 9 hours ago on Wednesday Mashup: Back to .500

Reply

@GreekGod @deedrag Yea, but I'm not quite sure why this is treated like a ridiculous comparison. For all we know, he just meant that he likes to be a rover on the PP, in which case the comparison is quite appropriate. 

5 days, 9 hours ago on Wednesday Mashup: Back to .500

Reply

@deedrag @Burtonboy Pretty sure he just means there are three guys who have experience coaching a team. 

5 days, 9 hours ago on Wednesday Mashup: Back to .500

Reply

@king leary So why would they do it with Kadri then?

6 days, 5 hours ago on Game Review: Game #4, Toronto Maple Leafs 3 vs. Colorado Avalanche 2 (OT)

Reply

@Potcy @Rhaegar_ I think he's fine if he isn't asked to defer to Kessel. Let him get up a head of steam and he seems to have no probelm gaining the zone. He just isn't very good at passing to players who are in motion while he's also in motion.

-

But I agree generally that our PP does some strange things. Why not have Gardiner or Rielly carry the puck in? That's one of their best traits. Sometimes I feel like we set our players up for failure. "Here Dion, you do this thing that others are better suited for, and for Godsake don't set-up for the one-timer".

6 days, 6 hours ago on Game Review: Game #4, Toronto Maple Leafs 3 vs. Colorado Avalanche 2 (OT)

Reply

@Mcost61 @Rhaegar_ @Chris Jay I'd be more willing to pay a price for someone younger and then revisit Staal talks in the summer. SImilar to the way Dallas picked up Seguin, then got Spezza on the cheap.

6 days, 6 hours ago on Game Review: Game #4, Toronto Maple Leafs 3 vs. Colorado Avalanche 2 (OT)

Reply

@Potcy They did change it last night. He was faking the pass to Kessel and then feeding it to someone entering the zone on the fly. It didn't work immediately, but they got the hang of it by the end of the game, thanks to us having 5 PP chances.

6 days, 6 hours ago on Game Review: Game #4, Toronto Maple Leafs 3 vs. Colorado Avalanche 2 (OT)

Reply

@TorontoMapleLeafs @mtommy They may not have a choice. They have twice disputed money with him, and he purposely signed his last deal to bring him to free agency.

6 days, 6 hours ago on Game Review: Game #4, Toronto Maple Leafs 3 vs. Colorado Avalanche 2 (OT)

Reply

@Mcost61 @Chris Jay Aaron Ward said last night that Toronto is the only team that Staal would waive his clause for, believe it or not.

6 days, 6 hours ago on Game Review: Game #4, Toronto Maple Leafs 3 vs. Colorado Avalanche 2 (OT)

Reply

@Forever17 @Mcost61 @skiingallday Pointless debate anyways as Phaneuf is almost certainly not going to want to move to a franchise even further behind than the Leafs.

6 days, 9 hours ago on Game Review: Game #4, Toronto Maple Leafs 3 vs. Colorado Avalanche 2 (OT)

Reply

@Burtonboy Very similar to us last year, except their luck lasted the whole season. They also had Stastny, who is a very good match-up center who allowed Duchene/O'Reilly and MacKinnon to wreak havoc offensively. I think Iginla will struggle to fit in with guys who create offense largely with their speed. Stastny is going to be a big blow. I also have my doubts as to whether Varlamov can continue playing as he did last year. 

2 weeks, 5 days ago on Thursday Mashup

Reply

Curious to see how Chicago handles their cap crunch. If they could lose Leddy for a pick without taking back any salary, they'd have a shade under 600K in cap space, and could just run a 22 man roster. 

2 weeks, 5 days ago on Thursday Mashup

Reply

@Burtonboy Do we know who is going to be on it yet? Anthony said it was a surprise.

2 weeks, 5 days ago on Thursday Mashup

Reply

@Yan28 @Burtonboy Questioning who he plays with isn't an excuse. 

3 weeks, 6 days ago on Wednesday Mashup: Undefeated Pre-Season Leafs Head To Ottawa

Reply

@wiski At what point does he talk about Kessel?

1 month, 1 week ago on Spencer Abbott signs one-year deal

Reply

@LN-093 @.JVR. It's pretty good that they compensated you. They could have just said "too bad, so sad". I'd take Marlies tickets as an apology. 

1 month, 1 week ago on Spencer Abbott signs one-year deal

Reply

@CanuckUKinToronto The conversation has been pretty strong though.

1 month, 1 week ago on Spencer Abbott signs one-year deal

Reply

@Yaknowwhat @Rhaegar_ @ingy56 @mcloki Yea, on both sides of the equation you have some pretty big obstacles. 

1 month, 1 week ago on Spencer Abbott signs one-year deal

Reply

@Yaknowwhat @ingy56 @mcloki At the same time, there's no guarantee a new franchise in Toronto would be anywhere near as successful. Leaf fans are too invested to just swap allegiances. I really don't know who would fork over the money required to bring the team here on the gamble that it might be a second MLSE. It could be a flop. Not a flop in the sense that it wouldn't make money, but a flop in the sense that paying 1-2B for it would be a gigantic over-payment. 

1 month, 1 week ago on Spencer Abbott signs one-year deal

Reply

@.JVR. @Rhaegar_ Lupul will be traded in time. I doubt he finishes his contract here. 

1 month, 1 week ago on Spencer Abbott signs one-year deal

Reply

@.JVR. @Rhaegar_ 2, or possibly 3, depending on how much experience he gains. 

1 month, 1 week ago on Spencer Abbott signs one-year deal

Reply

@dlb Mad @Rhaegar_ I know, and to be fair, last year was the most forgivable. I feel like I still would have traded Raymond at the very least.  These decisions wouldn't have existed if we hadn't made errors before though. Like I said, the situation really snow-balled because of some initial miscalculations. I think we have to be a little more ruthless about what constitutes being successful enough to not be sellers at the deadline.

1 month, 1 week ago on Spencer Abbott signs one-year deal

Reply

@dlb Mad @.JVR. We own his rights for six more years minimum. There's no rush. He has played one season of pro hockey. 

1 month, 1 week ago on Spencer Abbott signs one-year deal

Reply

@dlb Mad @Rhaegar_  Well, this year we didn't make the playoffs anyways, and passed on trading Raymond, Kulemin and McClement. I doubt their absence would have been missed, and for all we know, increased (forced) ice time for Holland and Ashton may have been a boost.

-

The year prior, you could make a case that trading MacArthur leaves us outside the playoffs, but if trading a piece that you deemed not worth having destroys our chances at the playoffs, isn't that further proof we should be thinking macro, and moving on from him?

-

The year prior to that is really when the big decisions were made that set everything else in motion. Burke kept everyone in the hopes they could turn it around, and in the end, created the snowball effect for all the future decisions on those players. 

1 month, 1 week ago on Spencer Abbott signs one-year deal

Reply

@dlb Mad @Rhaegar_ It doesn't kill me either on an individual basis, but when it's 2 or 3 guys every year, it starts to add up. Imagine if we had those 3 first rounders in the system right now instead of nothing. Nothing about roster would be different except that we'd have 3 assets extra, of notable value. 

1 month, 1 week ago on Spencer Abbott signs one-year deal

Reply

@dlb Mad @Rhaegar_ I know that you can sort of explain all the circumstances that resulted in those decisions making sense in the moment they were made. What I'm saying is that the organization probably needs to take a more macro-view of their dealings while they're in a stage of being playoff hopefuls, so that you don't ever find yourself having to make those decisions to begin with. 

-

In 2012, this might have looked like: "Well, we've been in a tailspin for a month and our goalie is still injured, and everyone hates the coach. We've got offers on the table for our whole 2nd line. We're no where near the Cup. Take them." Or maybe you keep one of them in that situation (likely the center), but you don't just keep moving forward with everyone until they leave you for nothing. 

1 month, 1 week ago on Spencer Abbott signs one-year deal

Reply

@dlb Mad @Rhaegar_ Okay, well maybe I'll adapt the analogy to say you just decide to give your house away to the first buyer who offers you exactly what you paid for it (or less), and forget about the equity you've accrued. 

1 month, 1 week ago on Spencer Abbott signs one-year deal

Reply

@dlb Mad @Rhaegar_  The analogy makes even more sense when you consider that. That's exactly the point. Just because you have outgrown something doesn't mean you discard it and take out a second mortgage. We invested in those pieces, and then got nothing for them. 

-

You might have a point on the contracts/cap stuff, if we had adequately replaced any of these players. Not only do we have nothing to show for developing them into NHL talents and allowing them to gain league wide recognition resulting in 20M dollar deals getting done - but we also have no suitable replacements for them. There is still no one to fill Grabovski's role. We hope that Holland can do it, but we have no idea - he may not even make the team. We're hoping MacArthur can be replaced by Booth or Santorelli, but MacArthur has been better then them year after year for some time now. We have no choice but to hope Clarkson can be a winger replacement for someone like Kulemin. 

-

I guess you might argue pretty successfully that a guy like Winnik is an upgrade on Colborne, but that's about it. 

1 month, 1 week ago on Spencer Abbott signs one-year deal

Reply

@LeafsGuru @Rhaegar_ @dlb Mad Yes, but we were offered a pick and a prospect for him the previous year and kept him despite the tailspin. And buying him out with an amnesty after his worst season ever was still not wise. Why not give him another year and then use the amnesty if you have to? if he has a better year, you can trade him, or retain a little salary and trade him. 

-

I didn't want to pay Kulemin 4M - I wanted to trade him to one of the teams who did want him. Again, if he's getting 16M somewhere, than teams were willing to pay for him. We were offered a 1st round pick for him in 2012, and last year Dreger said it would take literally no effort to move Kulemin to a contender. Granted, it's Dreger, but still, good defensive forwards are strong commodities at the deadline. 

-

Colborne was not a circumstance of lower cap, he was a circumstance of cap mismanagement. The only reason Chicago couldn't afford Niemi is because they won the Cup and Toews and Kane received max bonuses on their ELC's - the only players to ever achieve that. We couldn't do it because of poor decision making forcing us to run a roster 3 men short. 

1 month, 1 week ago on Spencer Abbott signs one-year deal

Reply

@LeafsGuru @Rhaegar_ @dlb Mad If you get a raise at work and suddenly you are ready to move into a larger home, would you just give the old one away for nothing because you don't want it anymore anyways? That's just a really lame excuse for bad management. So you didn't like Grabovski - great. He's not everyone's cup of tea. Fact is, other NHL teams have now paid him almost 25M dollars since we bought him out. MacArthur has about 20M since we let him go. Kulemin 16M. Colborne has a new contract and will get a shot at the top six this year. These guys had value. Whether you wanted them or not, they were perfectly suitable assets for someone else; clearly.

1 month, 1 week ago on Spencer Abbott signs one-year deal

Reply

@LeafsGuru @Rhaegar_ @CanuckUKinToronto @dlb Mad Ha, those teams won the Cup and were maxed to the salary cap limit and those are pretty much the only names they lost without a return, between the three of them. You could also add Viktor Stalberg to the list, but that's it. And when you look at that list, well, Ference was a bottom pairing D, Scuderi is quite old and has clearly lost a step, and Niemi only left because his arbitration award placed him outside Chicago's cap limit after a Cup win. 

-

LA turned their back-up goalie into Gaborik. Chicago used a pick they traded an asset for to bring in Brandon Saad. Smart teams turn the assets their done with into something that can continue helping them more often than not.  We have more players we've let go for nothing than these three teams combined. 

1 month, 1 week ago on Spencer Abbott signs one-year deal

Reply

@.JVR. I don't think he said anything about balancing the lines - just making 3 scoring lines. Could still be top heavy. Depends what version of Booth you're getting though.

1 month, 1 week ago on Spencer Abbott signs one-year deal

Reply

@LeafsGuru @Rhaegar_ @dlb Mad No one wants a farm for them. A return indicative of their worth would be nice though. Four of the names I mentioned have top six roles, all four of them making at least 3M a year, with 3 of them over 4M - yet we shouldn't worry about getting a return because someone wouldn't give the farm? We were offered a first round pick for 2 of those names.

1 month, 1 week ago on Spencer Abbott signs one-year deal

Reply

@CanuckUKinToronto @Rhaegar_ @dlb Mad Really? Who is Chicago letting go for no return? LA? Boston?

1 month, 1 week ago on Spencer Abbott signs one-year deal

Reply

@dlb Mad But the players we keep letting go for nothing do find roles on other teams. MacArthur, Grabovski, Raymond, Kulemin, Colborne, even McClement. It's not like after we let them go, no one could find any room for them.

1 month, 1 week ago on Spencer Abbott signs one-year deal

Reply

@Burtonboy So hard to justify when you have guys like Hjalmarsson and Seidenberg making 4M. 

1 month, 1 week ago on Spencer Abbott signs one-year deal

Reply

@LeafsGuru @Rhaegar_ @dlb Mad He used it very well in Calgary. Leaf fans have a very particular thing they want done with size. Colborne uses it to control the boards and set up plays. It's unfortunate that Carter Ashton was hitting more than him and subsequently bumped the better player from the roster. 

1 month, 1 week ago on Spencer Abbott signs one-year deal

Reply

@LeafsGuru @Rhaegar_ @dlb Mad No, but they were hopelessly out-matched in the Finals. At the end they have nothing to show for it, and they lost two 1st round picks, Stralman, Richards, Boyle, Dorsett, etc...

1 month, 1 week ago on Spencer Abbott signs one-year deal

Reply

@MaxwellHowe @Rhaegar_ @LeafsGuru @dlb Mad I can't think of a fan base in the league that degrades its own players better than the Leafs. Though yes, it is amusing how Leaf Nation can simultaneously make a decent NHL player seem like a washed up scrub, and yet also find the notion of trading a prospect totally abhorrent. 

1 month, 1 week ago on Spencer Abbott signs one-year deal

Reply

@Burtonboy @Rhaegar_ @ingy56 @Mcost61 I hope not, because invariably someone is putting their foot in their mouth in the new era of social media access to the team. 

1 month, 1 week ago on Spencer Abbott signs one-year deal

Reply

@LeafsGuru @Rhaegar_ @dlb Mad We are not in any position to delude ourselves into thinking we can win the Stanley Cup though. We are a team that has made the playoffs once in a decade. We need to to be collecting assets and not losing them for nothing. Colorado just drafted a potential Crosby-like talent, so of course they can afford to part with Stastny. Even then, I bet Stastny wishes he'd traded him for a quality defender when he had the chance. 

1 month, 1 week ago on Spencer Abbott signs one-year deal

Reply

@dlb Mad @Rhaegar_ Has an edge on Holland right now, in my opinion. We have no idea what to expect from Kontiola. 

1 month, 1 week ago on Spencer Abbott signs one-year deal

Reply

@MaxwellHowe @Rhaegar_ @LeafsGuru @dlb Mad I know what you said. It is just all too typical of Leaf Nation. 

1 month, 1 week ago on Spencer Abbott signs one-year deal

Reply