Livefyre Profile

Activity Stream

It's interesting to see Clare Higgins among the guest cast considering her role in Night of the Doctor.

1 week, 4 days ago on Missy Back in Two-Part Series 9 Opener

Reply

@ItsSmallerOnTheOutside @DalekSupreme1  I've listened to Mr. TARDIS' comments about Eccleston and don't consider him to be a remotely reliable source. It's unclear if he was even at the event that he claims Eccleston walked away from (he didn't use the term "stormed off"), and the fact that he uses ridiculous terms terms like "moral obligation" (used around 7:30 in his April 10 2013 piece about whether he should return) in relation to how Eccleston should act towards the program after his departure (an area where he presents debated theories as if they're settled facts). In short, I put a bit more stock in comments made on national broadcasts than the internet ramblings of Mr. TARDIS.

1 month, 3 weeks ago on Russell T Davies on New Who’s 10th Anniversary

Reply

@DalekSupreme1 I passionately disagree with your comments regarding Eccleston as a person. How can you sensibly say that an actor (whose portrayal thrilled millions and did much to turn people who never had much use for the program into fans) saying that he's “very proud of what we did over those 13 episodes” being in any way being mealy-mouthed about Doctor Who? If you can point to an interview or other comments Eccleston has made that disparaged the program short-shrift, feel free to offer them, but I've never seen and/or heard about him being anything less than polite when asked about Doctor Who, especially when the people asking were younger fans.

1 month, 3 weeks ago on Russell T Davies on New Who’s 10th Anniversary

Reply

I would have put Ghost Light on the list on place of Greatest Show in the Galaxy but that's what makes it a good list. McCoy's tenure on the show is almost a Rorschach test for fans, an exercise in  getting to the heart of what it is they personally love (or hate) about Doctor Who rather than any kind of universal absolutes. In some ways, Dragonfire is the story that best exemplifies this for me, combining as it does brilliance and nonsense in terms of both scripting and execution. Some of the dialogue is among the best in the show's history, while other elements of the script are simply cringe-worthy. Likewise, for every moment where the production design makes you forget that this was made on a scant BBC drama budget, there's another that seems almost designed to provide all the cliches about wobbly sets and so forth. I don't always like it, but I love it.

6 months, 2 weeks ago on The Seventh Doctor: Five Favourites

Reply

"Another issue fans might have with the second story is that the ideas used might go over their head. It’s very abstract in a sense and hard to wrap your head around it if you’re not used to it this level of creativity." - I would respectfully suggest to Mr. Behr that impugning the intelligence of the likely listeners might not be the most effective means of criticizing a story.




6 months, 2 weeks ago on Review: The Fifth Doctor Box Set (Spoiler-Free)

Reply

When/where did SImm say this? I'd be curious to know what he actually said about the role rather than just reading an interpretation from someone who seems to have a bias against the writer who scripted his episodes.

7 months, 1 week ago on McGann: Charles Dance Would Be a Great Master

Reply

@The Finn If you found Dance's roles unmemorable, I dare say you just haven't watched the right ones yet. Putting aside the very recent Game of Thrones, his standout roles include the terrific 2005 BBC production of Bleak House and the Terry Pratchett/Discworld miniseries Going Postal.

7 months, 2 weeks ago on McGann: Charles Dance Would Be a Great Master

Reply

@YaelMoise @wetsun More to the point, why does it need to be explained? The fact that the sixth Doctor looked just like the guard commander on Gallifrey who shot the previous Doctor was never explained, despite the fact that it was an era in the show's production history where explaining away a continuity question was seen as sufficient grounds to commission a story. Put another way, if the regime that commissioned "Attack of the Cybermen" didn't feel the need to explain the current Doctor looking exactly like a supporting character from a couple seasons back, surely the current team can do so as well.

8 months, 2 weeks ago on WHOops! When Doctor Who Gets It Wrong

Reply