Livefyre Profile

Activity Stream

One of the few occasions I agree with Moff and he's probably telling porkies


3 weeks, 2 days ago on Moffat on Why the Master Won’t Be Back

Reply

@SephoraNeedSeries8 @Moves Like Jagaroth Your point was that for NuWho audiences the Cybermen were created in 2006, yes?  If people have been watching from then, they'll know it was an old foe from before their new creation as the Doctor stipulates.  If they haven't they may not be aware of the new Cybus line anyway.  In any event I can't see why you'd assume a NuWho audience is so prone to confusion - I still don't really get your objection to a Mondasian appearance.  I can't see why it should confuse anyone in a story which would undoubtedly reveal the reason for its appearance.

4 weeks ago on Capaldi & Moffat on Axons, Cybermen and the Master

Reply

@SephoraNeedSeries8 @Moves Like Jagaroth Anyone who has been watching consistently since 2006 is well aware by now the enormous history of the programme and the villains it includes - they are either on board with this or no longer watch.  I've not seen the 10th Planet either!  Fans find stuff out.  I don't know what kind of audience you're talking about to be honest.

4 weeks ago on Capaldi & Moffat on Axons, Cybermen and the Master

Reply

@SephoraNeedSeries8 @Moves Like Jagaroth I think that's rather patronising to the audience, don't you?  Let them decide if they're confused or not.

4 weeks, 1 day ago on Capaldi & Moffat on Axons, Cybermen and the Master

Reply

@SephoraNeedSeries8 @Moves Like Jagaroth Hang on a minute.  I don;t want Genesis of the Cybermen either but that doesn't exclude the possibility of meeting the Cybermen at an earlier point on their timeline, surely?


1 month ago on Capaldi & Moffat on Axons, Cybermen and the Master

Reply

This is not an either/or situation - if we can go back to Victorian or Shakespearean England, we can surely go back to an earlier era of any of the enemies, with the exception perhaps of those with the power to move through time.


1 month ago on Capaldi & Moffat on Axons, Cybermen and the Master

Reply

@SephoraNeedSeries8 With the greatest of respect this doesn't take into account the time travel factor does it?  We've visited Daleks at an early stage of development - why not the Cybermen.  Of course they're not going to devolve - that WOULD be silly, I think.

1 month ago on Capaldi & Moffat on Axons, Cybermen and the Master

Reply

There was an old comic strip from Doctor Who monthly called Junkyard Demon which was a very effective use of a Mondasian should you wish to look it up.

1 month ago on Capaldi & Moffat on Axons, Cybermen and the Master

Reply

@Amy is Hannibal No, no, no.  I don't mean Moff is insulting us.  I meant that the Mondasians are closest to us as humans and therefore the more frightening.  That's all.  Not entirely sure what you think I meant :)


1 month ago on Capaldi & Moffat on Axons, Cybermen and the Master

Reply

Dear old Moff.  Sometimes he just doesn't get it, does he?  The Mondasian Cybermen are most frightening because they are the closest to US.  They are at the early stages of their development - winging it technologically to a certain degree.  We look at them and they are essentially reanimated cadavers -  dead boys in jumpers if you will.  As for the Axons - just needs a little reimagination, surely?

1 month ago on Capaldi & Moffat on Axons, Cybermen and the Master

Reply

I rather wonder if Gallifrey is not a bizarre amalgam of parts of planets from across time - so - a bit of Skaro, a bit of Earth, a bit of Mondas etc.  And in a state of permanent flux perhaps.  A collage planet which shifts its composition almost seasonally.



2 months ago on An Earthly Gallifrey

Reply

Doesn't need to be darker.  Does need to be less silly.


2 months ago on Should Doctor Who Adopt a Darker Tone?

Reply

It's really a question of balance between the light and the dark which has been a little off recently imo


2 months ago on Should Doctor Who Adopt a Darker Tone?

Reply

What I would have loved would have been for the Doctor 'undercover' to continue a good deal longer than it did.


2 months, 1 week ago on New Who: The Story Thus Far – Series 6 (Episodes 8-13)

Reply

“How to I tell this story beautifully and blow away the audience?”  Let's hope they achieve this.




3 months ago on Two-Part Finale for Series 8

Reply

@ilyootha @Moves Like Jagaroth  Just think - totally mined out - environmentally crippled - would make a great, tragic story

3 months, 2 weeks ago on Series 8 Filming in Lanzarote, Hermione Norris Cast

Reply

I wonder if it might not be Peladon

3 months, 3 weeks ago on Series 8 Filming in Lanzarote, Hermione Norris Cast

Reply

I agree to an extent and I think there's a certain inevitability that the two key enemies - Daleks and Cyberman - have reached a place where their very presence is seen to be enough to carry the story which it clearly isn't.  These enemies ought to be used very sparingly and their stories handled with even greater consideration.  Closing Time and Nightmare In Silver were awful dilutions to the cyber mythos.  Of the cyber stories I've seen only Tomb, Earthshock and the Age of Steel have any weight. 

3 months, 3 weeks ago on Why the Cybermen should be Doctor Who’s best monster

Reply

Not to mention Liam Cunningham, Tobias Menzies and David Warner!

4 months ago on 10 Misused Actors in Doctor Who

Reply

For me she is a character under construction - I just hope she's completed before it's time to go - only memorable moment for me is in Asylum where she really shone.  

4 months ago on 10 Scene Stealing Clara Moments

Reply

All to recent IMO - would much prefer to see The Mara

4 months, 1 week ago on 5 New Who Monsters in Need of a Return

Reply

Also feel Daleks and Cybermen are due an extended rest


4 months, 1 week ago on 5 New Who Monsters in Need of a Return

Reply

@PK-S  Elevenses of the Doctor (a trick missed there, Moff).  I guess that could be a multi-Doctor story featuring LOADS of Matt Smiths!



4 months, 1 week ago on Matt Smith: I’ll happily come back

Reply

And you'd be very welcome :)

4 months, 1 week ago on Matt Smith: I’ll happily come back

Reply

It's funny how broad opinion can be - I'd put Dalek first for Episode 6 and Bells very much last!

4 months, 2 weeks ago on Series 1-7 Face-Off Results: Everything Else (Episodes 1-8)

Reply

I honestly feel this dislike towards Love and Monsters is unwarranted - there have been far worse episodes.  It was a cleverly told story which Marc Warren sold with utter emotional integrity.  Peter Kay's costume is absurd, but then you think of what he's actually doing to people and it's pretty horrific.  Also irreversible - none of your 'deus ex' here.

4 months, 2 weeks ago on Series 1-7 Face-Off Results: Nightmare Run (Episodes 9-13, Specials)

Reply

Reminds me of the Androids of Tara

4 months, 2 weeks ago on Series 8 Filming: A Merry Day

Reply

Something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue.  Nuff said.

4 months, 3 weeks ago on Smith: The best storytelling was in Series 5

Reply

Totally agree with you, Matt.  Please take note Mr M.

4 months, 3 weeks ago on Smith: The best storytelling was in Series 5

Reply

You make valid points.  What's interesting to me is that I'm prepared to forgive all this because I felt the story was well told.  I can't forgive Cold War, by contrast, and quite a few others, because they were told so badly.  

4 months, 3 weeks ago on Unpopular Opinion: Asylum of the Daleks

Reply

Pete coming back for Rose made me cry

4 months, 3 weeks ago on Series 1-7 Face-Off: Episode 13

Reply

Arggghhh.  Love Vincent but going to have to go with Blink

5 months ago on Series 1-7 Face-Off: Episode 10

Reply

Some very, very strong contenders here.  So much so have to abstain!

5 months ago on Series 1-7 Face-Off: Episode 9

Reply

Human Nature - outstanding

5 months ago on Series 1-7 Face-Off: Episode 8

Reply

Dalek - no contest

5 months ago on Series 1-7 Face-Off: Episode 6

Reply

Victory - Daleks managed to be both devious and tasteless!

5 months, 1 week ago on Series 1-7 Face-Off: Episode 3

Reply

Mary Shelley - now that might have some mileage


5 months, 1 week ago on Gatiss Confirms Two Capaldi Eps, Hints at Jane Austen Story

Reply

Don't really see how it can be anything other than Rose.  Ushered in a completely new take on the Doctor and everything that's followed.

5 months, 1 week ago on Series 1-7 Face-Off: Episode 1

Reply

Agree about no.1

5 months, 1 week ago on Best of Matt Smith: Results Series 5-7

Reply

The Snowmen and The Angels duo are so far apart in my opinion they are almost a different show

5 months, 1 week ago on Best of Matt Smith: Results (12-06)

Reply

We're all dooooooomed!  (Dad's Army reference)

5 months, 2 weeks ago on Moffat: Doomed dialogue sounds great in Scottish

Reply

What a cute little tail

5 months, 2 weeks ago on Series 8 Filming: Sneak Peek at a New Monster

Reply

Mystified.  May have to withdraw to my bunker.

5 months, 2 weeks ago on Best of Matt Smith: Results (39-34)

Reply

Keeley Hawes is a fabulous actress turning in a surely Bafta winning performance in Line of Duty but, much as I like the way she looks from a lustful perspective, this does seem to be the standard evil lady costume

5 months, 3 weeks ago on Series 8: Keeley Hawes cast as Ms Delphox

Reply

Just between watching Matt's Silurian story - excellent storytelling, characterisation and pace - aspects almost entirely absent in most of 7b alas

5 months, 3 weeks ago on Best of Matt Smith: Series 7 (2012-2013)

Reply

This was an 8/10 season for me.  Strong, fresh, richly characterized, with strong stories and an intriguing series arc.  A ball somehow got dropped in the following season, then dropped further again.  If pushed I would say the Angels double did it for me - a real triumph.

5 months, 3 weeks ago on Best of Matt Smith: Series 5 (2010)

Reply

I think this season more than any other has shown how bad Dr Who can be and how wonderful.  I still don't really know where we are in the Whoniverse - what's happened and what has unhappened.  The glove has been pulled inside and out and back again so many times.  I felt in watching the Anniversary this was the new incarnation of Who I'd come to enjoy since its revival but that was the only time I felt this in 7B (not because of Tennant etc).  For all its largesse it was a simple story well-told.  I miss the stories that were killed at birth.  The Doctor grieving for Rory and Amy and slowly recovering through Clara's influence, that sparky character from Asylum who has remained undeveloped.  The Doctor in hiding (presumed dead) from the end of series 6.  Ideas that had so much more to give and were surrendered too rapidly.  I celebrate the Anniversary Special - it did all it had to do and more but I continue to be bewildered by those who can rank the rest of 7b alongside it.




5 months, 3 weeks ago on Best of Matt Smith: The Time of the Doctor

Reply

@Deus_Ex_Machina  That's to suggest we won't get better - which would suck even more

5 months, 3 weeks ago on Best of Matt Smith: The Time of the Doctor

Reply

After the Anniversary Special this was rather bungled and disappointing 5/10

5 months, 3 weeks ago on Best of Matt Smith: The Time of the Doctor

Reply