Livefyre Profile

Activity Stream

@Planet of the Deaf I doubt that you'll find a lot of fans who didn't like this season so far on this site, seeing as how they tend to be treated in a very poor way or are told that they're not true fans. When you go to other sites or visit groups on FB the opinions differ wildly. Some people think this is the best, others think it's abysmal and there's lots of opinions in-between. I'm still not convinced by Capaldi's Doctor and I haven't truly enjoyed one single episode as of yet, at least not as much as I enjoyed The God Complex, Midnight or Waters of Mars. For me it feels incredibly mediocre and I really want to see what another showrunner would do with the show. Quite frankly, I've stopped watching after Time Heist and will wait for the season to finish, like I did with season 6. Then I'll go through the remaining episodes, see where that leaves me and hope for a better season.

3 weeks ago on Thoughts on Series 8 at the Halfway Point

Reply

@LucasW You cannot like an era if it doesn't speak to you on some level, be it intellectually or emotionally or story-wise or character-wise. I'm with you; I haven't enjoyed the latest series as much as I'd hoped and it's gotten to the point that I decided to stop watching, wait for all episodes to have aired and then watch them in succession. I did that during the sixth season as well, 'cause I couldn't stand River and some other stories. In the end that worked for me in getting through the season, finding some episodes that I could enjoy and then moving on to the next season. However, you CANNOT - and I can't emphasize this enough - you CANNOT suddenly start liking or loving a writer/showrunner just because you want to. For the same reason there are fans who didn't like Davies' era (or those of earlier showrunners) there are fans who aren't a 'fan' of Moffat's era. But that is okay, it really is. Don't doubt yourself, don't doubt that you're still a fan. It'll pass. There will come a showrunner, there will come a Doctor, when you'll be able to say 'OMG, this is why I love this show!' again. So, my advice: take a break. Wait for the season to finish. Watch it alone, or with some friends, and move on to the next season. Maybe you'll find episodes or characters you'll like; maybe you'll find stories you like. Or not. But, as I said. That's okay, that's alright. It doesn't make you less of a fan, although there are 'fans' out there who claim otherwise. Good luck, and above all: have fun!

3 weeks ago on Thoughts on Series 8 at the Halfway Point

Reply

@Dalek Jin I was starting to think I was the only one who thought that the ending in particular made this episode meaningless, so I'm glad to see I'm not alone in that regard. I had hope after watching the previous episode, but this one, to me at least, was awful. Boring throughout and the ending just sucked. It didn't make ANY kind of sense at all. I don't feel like going into details right now, but damn, this was really not my episode, not at all.

1 month, 1 week ago on Rate & Discuss Listen

Reply

@Cyberbloke You're certainly not in a minority, although the comments on this site might lead you to believe you are. To me this was the best episode so far, exactly for the reasons you listed. Yes, it was kinda cliche and I'm getting a bit tired of robots (again), but I laughed at the bantering and the Robin/Doctor interaction and for the first time in quite a long time I wasn't bothered by plot holes or inconsistencies while watching an episode. 

1 month, 1 week ago on Rate & Discuss Robot of Sherwood

Reply

I'm getting a bit fed up with all these teasing, to be honest. I understand why he'd do this, like Oodkind explained, but come on... Can we stop with this already? It's getting to the point of not being funny or endearing any longer, but rather be annoying or infuriating.

2 months, 1 week ago on Capaldi Unclear on Series 9 Return

Reply

I agree with you completely. I don't think is necessary to explain, but we'll probably get an explanation, whether we like it or not. I for one think that any explanation, be it a short, subtle or a long, contrived one, will not be satisfactory. I just don't see WHY, when these coincidences have never been explained before today.

2 months, 1 week ago on Why Capaldi’s Previous Appearances Shouldn’t Really Matter

Reply

Thank you for this lovely article. I keep hearing from a friend that Colin is amazing in the audio books and  I've been thinking about listening to the Big Finish audio books, but you've convinced me to start RIGHT NOW!

2 months, 1 week ago on In Defense of Colin Baker

Reply

That's a strange statement,  considering the Master, like the Daleks and the Cybermen, is as iconic an enemy as they are. To say the Master would never return 'because his story is done' is the same as saying the Daleks or the Cybermen would never return 'because their story is done'. Ridiculous. Perhaps Moffat doesn't want to 'revive' the Master, but I sure as heck believe that a next showrunner might think differently. Oh, and Moffat lies. Seriously, we should all stop saying that right now, because, as House always says: "Everybody lies." Can we be done with that absolutely empty phrase now?

2 months, 2 weeks ago on Moffat on Why the Master Won’t Be Back

Reply

Quite a lot of Earth stuff. ... Sigh. I want to see less Earth stuff, not more. I want to see the universe, you know, what every Doctor promises his companions? To see wondrous things and such? Not hop around in Earth's time line all the time.

2 months, 2 weeks ago on Moffat on Series 8’s Smaller Story Arc

Reply

I'm still firmly of the opinion that it doesn't have to be addressed or explained in any way, shape or form. I do understand certain people would like that, but really is it necessary? I believe it's completely unnecessary and instead of having to deal with this, let's rather put a bit more effort into the plot, which is far more interesting than some arbitrary explanation about why the Doctor has a face we've seen before. Suspense of disbelief, I believe it's called.

2 months, 2 weeks ago on Doctor Who and the Doppelganger Dilemma

Reply

I was of the opinion that 'Clara is not a good companion' was the more 'popular' opinion, but perhaps I'm mistaken.

2 months, 3 weeks ago on Popular / Unpopular Opinion: Clara Oswald

Reply

Then perhaps it's due to English being my second language that I misconstrue the way 'popular' is used. In Dutch 'popular' doesn't necessarily mean 'the opinion most people agree with', just that it's one that's better-known or that its 'followers' are more vocal about. Which is what I view the 'popular' opinion about Clara to be: better-known and its followers are more vocal about it. Although that's been changing quite a lot lately.

2 months, 3 weeks ago on Popular / Unpopular Opinion: Clara Oswald

Reply

Don't. Please. Don't explain ANYTHING. It's fine the way it is. We get that one actor can play more parts. I don't need to have it explained, 'cause any and every explanation will come across as just that: an explanation, tacked-on as an afterthought. It's not necessary. Really. Just... don't.

2 months, 3 weeks ago on Capaldi’s Familiar Face Addressed in a Low-key Way

Reply

I don't see why one is the 'popular' opinion and he other is the 'unpopular' one. They're both just that: opinions. I don't like Clara, but not necessarily for all the reasons stated in the 'unpopular' article. I see her potential and how it's not fulfilled at all. I also think she's what one of my teachers used to call a 'cardboard cut-out'. But that's neither here nor there. That's my opinion. Someone else might have another opinion altogether and that's FINE as long as we can talk about it in a constructive way. Neither opinion is more popular than the other one. It might be that more people feel one way or the other, but that doesn't mean the opinion itself is /popular/. Could be please stop using those words in articles that merely state someone's opinion instead of already having an article be biased by the mere use of the word 'unpopular' or 'popular'?

2 months, 3 weeks ago on Popular / Unpopular Opinion: Clara Oswald

Reply

I am a fan of Capaldi already and I haven't even seen the first episode yet! Go, mister Capaldi, GO!

2 months, 4 weeks ago on Capaldi was Adamant About No Flirting in Series 8

Reply

Such a shame that quite a lot of countries that sport an impressive amount of Who-fans are again being left out. I won't be able to watch the episode live, but quite a lot of my friends would love to go and see it in a theater.

3 months ago on Deep Breath To Be Shown in Cinemas Globally

Reply

I am very happy to hear this. Actions and decisions should have consequences.

3 months ago on Moffat: Series 8 Not A Fairytale, There Are Consequences

Reply

There are so many counterarguments to this theory that I'll stick with a heart-felt NO.

3 months, 3 weeks ago on An Earthly Gallifrey

Reply

@DonKlees @YaelMoise @wetsun That's what I keep saying as well. Let's NOT explain it. Leave it be. Like the little goof-ups mentioned in this article it's possible to just live with them. Not the big muck-ups, though (of which there have been a-plenty in both the classic series and the new series).

4 months ago on WHOops! When Doctor Who Gets It Wrong

Reply

@stargazer0118 My thoughts exactly.

4 months, 2 weeks ago on Why Bringing Back Gallifrey is Wrong

Reply

@Notsosmartguy  @Diana van der Pluijm He'll take on the Council? Like he tried (and failed) to do before he decided his entire race should perish?

4 months, 2 weeks ago on Why Bringing Back Gallifrey is Wrong

Reply

@Notsosmartguy  @Diana van der Pluijm @Rani Nose Even in Futurama there was tension because something had to be resolved and it always involved an element of danger (running out of money and not being able to eat, for instance, is still a 'danger').

4 months, 2 weeks ago on Why Bringing Back Gallifrey is Wrong

Reply

@Rani Nose If there is no fear for someone's life or even for someone's pain, then what is there to fear? What kind of excitement is there other than knowing there's a dangerous situation that has to be resolved? IF there's no danger, there's nothing to be concerned about. In every plot there's an aspect of danger, be it worry about someone's disappearance (and thus being in danger), about someone's well-being (be it physical or mental, probably brought on by an external danger), about having to find something of importance (due to someone or other being in danger of something), and so on and so forth. Without tension, no drama, no interest in what's going to happen. Good characters need good plots, otherwise it's just... watching everyday life in a sci-fi-setting. 

4 months, 2 weeks ago on Why Bringing Back Gallifrey is Wrong

Reply

@ilyootha @Diana van der Pluijm Why? Because I'd rather condemn one species than the entire universe? Yeah, very Dalek-like, to think of others. 

4 months, 2 weeks ago on Why Bringing Back Gallifrey is Wrong

Reply

@supermoff @Diana van der Pluijm And we know that, because...? It's all speculation of course, but I can't imagine the Doctor hating his own kind if it was 'just the ruling classes' that did this. Also, if there was a resistance... where were they?

4 months, 2 weeks ago on Why Bringing Back Gallifrey is Wrong

Reply

@Malohkeh @Diana van der Pluijm Ah, but at that point in time he'd already made that choice, which was why he made a different choice with the Daleks.

4 months, 2 weeks ago on Why Bringing Back Gallifrey is Wrong

Reply

@Notsosmartguy  @Diana van der Pluijm It's hard to answer your last question, 'cause I'm pretty sure I'd never be in a situation such as that and even if I were to say what I would do, it would still be speculation. But yes. If I felt that taking humanity out of the equation to save countless other species, then I'd be tempted to do that. Even though it would mean that I'd try to make up for this horrible decision the rest of my life, then yes. Your first question... It was both logical and moral, because, to save the lives of countless other innocents - including children on all those other planets, both born and yet unborn - the sacrifice of a 'mere' billion would be acceptable. Or would you rather see the Time Lords emerge, unscathed, from their pocket universe and try the same crap again? Plunge the whole universe, throughout all of time and space, in another Great Time War?

4 months, 2 weeks ago on Why Bringing Back Gallifrey is Wrong

Reply

@Notsosmartguy  @Diana van der Pluijm @Oodkind She's a cardboard cut-out because there's nothing else there, other than some skill we didn't even know she had or was 'magically' imbued with when the plot demanded it. What is Clara? Nothing but a girl we know exactly nothing about, other than the information that was needed at some point to move the plot along. Or not even that.

4 months, 2 weeks ago on Clara Oswald – A Question of Perspective

Reply

A World Tour. In seven cities. Wow. That's not a World Tour, it's a city trip. Sorry to be a bit underwhelmed by this announcement.

4 months, 2 weeks ago on Doctor Who World Tour To Promote Series 8

Reply

@Ollie Walton Harrod @HeyProfessor That's exactly the point. Well said! No one of importance dies. Not even River Song has truly died. No one dies, so there's no more danger, so why should I care about the characters, when I know that there's nothing they should fear, because in the end they all live long, happy lives? Even the bad guys (Time Lords) and Daleks?

4 months, 2 weeks ago on Why Bringing Back Gallifrey is Wrong

Reply

Thank you for this article. I particularly agree with you on how neither the Tenth (or the Ninth, where is the Ninth in all this?) would NOT want their people to return, because - as I and other fans have pointed out - a large part of Time Lord society had been corrupted to the part of them being considered as bad or worse than the Daleks. People keep bringing up 'but the children?'. Of course children have no part in a war, yet, but when they're brought up to feel the same arrogance as their parents hold for the rest of the universe - of course some of them might've rebelled, but apart from the Doctor we haven't seen or heard any resistance, so one is almost forced to conclude almost the entire Gallifreyan population supported Rassilon's decisions - are they really innocent? And, if they are, couldn't they have been saved while the guilty adults would've perished? Was 'saving' a species that perpetuated a war that has killed billions or even more, that waged across all of time and space - something we can't even imagine - the RIGHT thing to do? Or do the needs of the many - in this case THE REST OF THE UNIVERSE - outweight the needs of the few?

4 months, 2 weeks ago on Why Bringing Back Gallifrey is Wrong

Reply

@Oodkind That's exactly the reason why I still can't really see Clara as anything but 'that companion that's conveniently present whenever the plot needs someone to move it forward'. I still don't like Amy either, but I somehow respect her character more than I do Clara. She's just a cardboard cut-out of what someone thought a perfect companion should be. But she's suddenly a teacher, suddenly brave enough to sacrifice her own life (but not really, because she doesn't die), suddenly smart enough to help move the plot along, suddenly special enough to give a leaf the power to defeat a sun-parasite, and so on and so forth. I don't have much hope for this becoming any better with Capaldi, truth be told, and the sooner she's replaced, the better. 

4 months, 2 weeks ago on Clara Oswald – A Question of Perspective

Reply

@BeyondThePolice @Seaborn W Deadman Amy is the longest-serving companion? I think Jamie McCrimmon would like to have a word with you. ;-)

4 months, 3 weeks ago on Sexism and Doctor Who: The Truth

Reply

Alright, I admit: This comment of his has been taken completely out of context and whoever did that should at least be given a stern talking-to about how proper journalism works. On the other hand, as Moffat has admitted a few times, he should really be a bit more tactful about what he says at times. Not everyone understands or appreciates British humor and sometimes, well, he just says things that make me go 'really, Steven, is that really the smartest thing to say?'. This also goes for other famous persons, btw, who say (and do) things at times that make me want to triple facepalm myself (and that's hard to do, with glasses). So, maybe, just maybe, he should watch his words at times. BUT, again, in this case? Who the heck could've taken such a diplomatically worded opinion and turned it into "MOFFAT THINKS ALL DOCTORS ARE UGLY!"? That's... that's really something.

4 months, 3 weeks ago on Moffat Clarifies “Ugly Doctors” Comments

Reply

@robohappy  That's what I keep telling people - about how the Time Lords were considered to be so damn evil that no one could tell the difference between them and Daleks any more - but all I get is 'but think of the children!'. Eh, what about all those innocent children that were killed (or wiped from existence) because their own kind fought a bloody Time War - you know, a war throughout ALL OF TIME AND SPACE, not just on their planet - because of the Time Lords? How about the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few? How many times has the Doctor killed children of other species by committing genocide? But no. The Doctor is /good/, the Time Lords are good (except for a few who happened to be in charge and no one ever stood up to them?) and the rest of the universe, well, that's not important. I for one also think that McGann could've pulled of a magnificent battle-scarred veteran, they didn't need John Hurt for that. Also... I'm sorry to hear that until this episode you were okay with Moffat, only to have this disappoint you so badly. I haven't liked Moffat's showrunning for quite a while now, so the impact wasn't as great (not as much as I /hated/ the whole 'Clara saves all the Doctors'-story), but I can imagine this must've been quite a shock.

5 months ago on Smith on 50th Classic Doctor Criticisms

Reply

Yes. It's about time. Even though I (still) don't listen to Big Finish (I just can't find the time, har-de-har), I know enough people who do and who'd be thrilled to hear 'their' Doctor have all sorts of new adventures. 

5 months, 3 weeks ago on Is it Time to Give Big Finish the New Who Licence?

Reply

"I don't think we can ignore it." Yes, yes we can. Fans are very good at ignoring things they don't like. If we ignore it long and hard enough, it will simply cease to exist. ;-)

5 months, 3 weeks ago on RTD: Fans Can’t Ignore “Half-Human” Doctor

Reply

I'm not entirely sure I want to read about the Time War. I'm afraid that however good the writing will be, it will detract from the wonderful, amazing images that still fill my head whenever I think about The Nightmare Child and the Would-Be King and his army of have-beens and never-weres. Besides, it's a Time War. A war that's not just waged throughout time, but in time itself. I don't think it's possible to capture the utter insanity of this in a book or a movie. I think it's best left in the realms of imagination. But... I could of course be proven wrong. ;-)

5 months, 3 weeks ago on The War Doctor Returns in “Engines of War”

Reply

Thank you so much for writing this insightful article. Rose has been getting a lot of undeserved hate (I don't like that word, but there it is), especially when people pull the old 'Davies vs. Moffat'-card. If you look at her without all the prejudice from people (who may or may not have seen the actual episodes) what's left of Rose is actually a pretty well-rounded and realistic character. She's flawed, dear Lord yes, but aren't we all? It's the (semi-)perfect characters I don't like or the ones who are nothing but a plot-device or are devoid of any real characterization. With Rose, well, it's personal preference of course, but at least she was a human character. Like Sarah-Jane, like Donna, like Martha (what's up with all the negativity about her anyway?), like the Brigadier and many, many others. They weren't perfect, they had their flaws, but that's why they're likable (or unlikable, when it comes down to it). So, again, thank you. Now I'm curious to see if someone can write a similar piece about the character even long-time Whovians love to hate: Adric. ;-)

5 months, 3 weeks ago on A Bad Wolf or Just Plain Bad? Addressing Rose Criticisms

Reply

Finally. Let's all just put to rest this Eccleston-hate. He made a decision and now it shows that the producers not just accepted it, but respected it as well. Of course I would also have loved to see Christopher's face, but I understand now why they didn't even use stock footage or CGI. Let it go, people (and enough with the song references please ;-) ).

5 months, 3 weeks ago on Moffat on Why Hurt to Eccleston Regeneration Was So Short

Reply

Too bad it's yet another man. Where are the good female writers? I'm sure they're out there, so why aren't they contacted or even considered or asked to write a trial script or something?

6 months ago on Peter Harness Writing for Series 8?

Reply

Apart from the crappy CGI this isn't a bad episode, as you so eloquently put it. Doctor Who has never been about top-of-the-range special effects, it's all about the stories. And the story in this one is, to me at least, one that is very good. Not amazing, but very good.

6 months, 1 week ago on Do you want to live forever? The Lazarus Experiment In Perspective

Reply

Thank you for writing this. Eloquently put. Also, the stalks that come out of people's heads... stupid. But that's a personal nit pick I think. 

6 months, 1 week ago on Unpopular Opinion: Asylum of the Daleks

Reply

Just let him be a male friend that goes on all sorts of adventures with the Doctor. No romances, no bromances, no nothing. Just a guy who's helping another guy deal with all kinds of adventure-y stuff.

6 months, 3 weeks ago on Danny Pink: Recurring How?

Reply

Yay, a 'people like you' comment. As if you can discern my entire personality, likes and dislikes, beliefs and morals from one comment. I applaud you, good sir (madam?). As for gun control: It's a good thing to live in fear of being murdered by someone else your whole life. The only thing to do is not to take away that fear by trying to take away weapons, no, the best course of action is - of course! - to give EVERYONE weapons, 'cause then EVERYONE gets to live in equal fear. Yep. Sounds like a great plan. To be afraid to be shot when you give someone a strange look or say something another person doesn't agree with. Or because you wear nice shoes. Yep. Sounds like a world I'd want to live in, for sure. As to the rest of your comment: I'm not quite sure what you're saying? About a mirror and show and tell (it's "show, don't tell"). I'd like to either agree or disagree with you, but I'm not sure about what.


6 months, 3 weeks ago on Gatiss on Gallifrey & Time Lords’ Return

Reply

Ah, so the Doctor ordering every human to kill every Silent they ever meet is okay. But exterminating his own species to save AN ENTIRE UNIVERSE from them and the Daleks is wrong? Good to know. 


6 months, 3 weeks ago on Gatiss on Gallifrey & Time Lords’ Return

Reply

So, if people don't understand (part of) his story lines, he just /assumes/ they aren't intelligent? Or am I now assuming something as well?


6 months, 3 weeks ago on Moffat Explains Doctor’s Timey Tomb

Reply

So he also lied to Moffat? ... Sorry, I really, REALLY hate that line. 


6 months, 3 weeks ago on Moffat Explains Doctor’s Timey Tomb

Reply

Did he ever actually say the entire time period is fixed? As far as I could discern, it was only New York, which is still accessible via VM or he could, you know, land somewhere else and take a boat. Or hitch a ride on a spacecraft. In any case, why would he even want to 'rescue' them? They've lived happy lives together, what's there to 'rescue' them from? As far as companions go, they ended up with a pretty good ending.


6 months, 3 weeks ago on Moffat Explains Doctor’s Timey Tomb

Reply

That's what's been bothering me ever since that episode. And I'm not even going into the other unresolved story lines and plot threads (holes) that haven't been addressed and probably never will.


6 months, 3 weeks ago on Moffat Explains Doctor’s Timey Tomb

Reply