Livefyre Profile

Activity Stream

@ItsSmallerOnTheOutside, Member of CATS   I can kind of see the other traits you describe, but what made her bigoted in series 7?

I kind of think egotistical and selfish describe her more now than then, but don't get me wrong those are some of the reasons I love the character.

15 hours, 34 minutes ago on How the Character of Clara Oswald Was Saved

Reply

@SpontaneousFork  Not at all. We're not voting for an actor, but a representation of the Doctor that we preferred. If I preferred Hurt's interpretation, even if he was only showcased shortly, then I would vote for Hurt.

A vote for Hurt is in no way a spit in Tennant's face. He put in great effort, but that doesn't mean we have to prefer him simply because we knew his Doctor longer.

1 week, 4 days ago on Doctor of the Decade: Face-Off #2

Reply

@Oi, Watch it Spaceman!   I wouldn't say I like either more than The Eleventh Hour, but both are certainly highly ranked for me.

2 weeks, 4 days ago on All 117 Episodes of the Revival Ranked By You

Reply

I will probably be the only person (or one of the few) to say this, but I just honestly can't take Christopher Eccleston seriously in this role. Everything he does just seems disingenuous, and this coupled with what I feel to be primarily weak stories makes me rate him rather low as a Doctor. I do, like what was attempted to do with the character and I like the 9th Doctor's personality as a whole, it's just the execution of acting and story that I dislike. 3/10

2 weeks, 4 days ago on Doctor of the Decade: Rate the Ninth Doctor

Reply

@Typo42 "Magic Carrots" @EvilZygonRabbit  It's not really a Joss Whedon show. He gets a creator credit, but really hasn't had much (if any) creative involvement past writing the pilot. SHIELD is run by his brother Jed and Marissa Tancharoen. For this reason, and the fact that it is a separate show, it needs to be judged as something else entirely.

It's also pretty difficult to get to Firefly levels of greatness.

2 weeks, 6 days ago on Listen Up for Hugo Award

Reply

@scarvesandcelery @twoheartsonemind  Agreed. It is a shame, there are many pieces of work that deserve recognition, but it seems this award is not the place for it. Ms. Marvel, at least, may receive an Eisner nomination.

2 weeks, 6 days ago on Listen Up for Hugo Award

Reply

@EvilZygonRabbit  So true! Considering how great this season has been, it really deserves some nominations. I would say it misses out because of the stigma associated with the superhero genre not being real art, but there's The Flash with a nomination.

3 weeks ago on Listen Up for Hugo Award

Reply

I feel like Game of Thrones, which don't get me wrong I love, gets episodes nominated purely because of the last scenes. I think that happened with The Rains of Castemere's nomination last year, but the The Mountain and the Viper was an all around great episode.

Listen was a wonderful multi-layered episode and was especially interesting, I think, because of how it played with the typical Doctor Who episode format. There are other episodes this series that I think deserve nomination (Dark Water comes to mind off the top of my head), but Listen is still a very strong contender.

I don't watch Orphan Black (boy do I want to), The Flash or Grimm, so I can't comment, but from the little of Orphan Black I've seen, I'd wager it's a strong contender (in terms of quality) as well.

Still, the controversy over this year's nominations does lessen the honor of the award. I wouldn't fault anyone who chose to vote for the "no award" option instead.

3 weeks ago on Listen Up for Hugo Award

Reply

I like both the trousers and the hoodie/jacket combo, but not together. I'd much rather have Capaldi's more formal top with those trousers than the hoodie.


Still, I'm sure that the outfit will look much better on film and in action.

3 weeks, 5 days ago on 12th Doctor Costume Change for Series 9

Reply

This was an incredible article! Almost makes me want to go into statistics. Thank you for the time and effort you put into these, Supermoff. They were a joy to read.

3 weeks, 5 days ago on Rank the Revival: A Numbery-Wumbery Breakdown (Part 2)

Reply

I wasn't here from the beginning, either 1963 or 2005. I only found Doctor Who in 2011, but it's not an exaggeration to say that since then my life has been changed, and definitely for the better. I can without a doubt say that I am simply a happier person when a Doctor Who series is on TV. It may seem like a small thing, but at times it has been a thing I've desperately needed. It somehow brings an outlet for my creativity and emotions, and for that I am eternally grateful.

Happy birthday, New Who! Thank you for bringing me joy when I felt there was none.

1 month ago on Doctor Who’s Revival: 10 Years On

Reply

HUMAN NATURE/FAMILY OF BLOOD!!!!!!!! I've probably repeated this a thousand times by now, but they are my favorite episodes! I'm not sure how it'll fare, but it's really great to see these episodes get so much love (they deserve it).

Harder to choose between, but it's got to be Day of the Doctor. I love The Eleventh Hour very much, and both had so much weight on their shoulders to be good, and live up to those expectations, but if I'm going from my gut (and that's all I can do in these polls) then Day wins.

1 month ago on Revival Face-Off: Semi-Final #2

Reply

I can't stare at these polls too long otherwise I'll never vote. I've got to go from my gut and vote:

Human Nature/Family of Blood (my all time favorite episodes)

The Impossible Astronaut/Day of the Moon

(Oh, and I'm still sad Vincent and Midnight were knocked out)

1 month ago on Revival Face-Off: Semi-Final #1

Reply

This was actually pretty easy.


Vincent and the Doctor: As much as I love The Eleventh Hour, Vincent is on a whole other level. It means a lot to me on a personal level, but not in the way where you watch it with nostalgia, you re-wath it because of how meaningful it is.


The Impossible Astronaut/ Day of the Moon: I love Name of the Doctor, but these two episodes are near perfection.


Day of the Doctor: Picked this without hesitation. I like Listen a lot, but nothing can compare to the amazing 50th anniversary special.

1 month ago on Revival Face-Off: Moffat Era Triple

Reply

@dalek1099dw @ichabod @twoheartsonemind (Six Seasons and a Movie) @Huknar As far as acting, I disagree, at least with Jenna Coleman. I don't think Samuel Anderson has much of a stage presence, which hurts his acting, but in this case I thought he was alright. 

The Skovox Blitzer plot is an excuse to get the Doctor to the school and then result in Clara's two lives coming together. But Doctor Who is a show that's so much about characters, I don't see how having an episode that explicitly focuses on them can be a bad thing? Not every episode needs to be hard-core sci-fi and the sci-fi situation here had a purpose. The idea that Clara's traveling with this alien and leading a double life has effects on her and those she cares about (the Doctor and Danny). The episode doesn't need to completely be about the actual time/space traveling itself, because we already know that happens (and if we need a reminder it's in the pre-title sequence); this episode is about the effects of that.

1 month, 2 weeks ago on How Should Doctor Who Evolve?

Reply

If this was just between The Waters of Mars and The Impossible Planet, I'd pick The Impossible Planet, but I don't really like The Satan Pit (I find it somehow anticlimactic after what was set up, it just didn't live up to it's potential for me), so The Waters of Mars for me.

1 month, 2 weeks ago on Revival Face-Off: Round #3

Reply

@dalek1099dw @Huknar  Why does character drama imply soap opera? That episode was a character study and in a show like Doctor Who, the characters are as important as the creatures. The best sci-fi focuses on the nature of humanity when confronted with these sci-fi situations; and that means there must be an emphasis on character. The sci-fi doesn't have to be in your face, but can be a catalyst for the reactions of characters.

1 month, 2 weeks ago on How Should Doctor Who Evolve?

Reply

@Conall McCormick  I'd rather see some fan's ideas implemented rather than actual fans writing episodes. Even if they are good writers, most wouldn't have the experience with writing scripts; they would probably only be familiar with writing prose. Even Neil Gaiman, who is an accomplished author, had trouble switching over to the script format.

1 month, 2 weeks ago on How Should Doctor Who Evolve?

Reply

@SirTrey @MrRazza has always wanted to ram something  I think I'm the only person who dislikes Dalek. I just honestly think it's boring and poorly acted (except for Billie Piper).

1 month, 2 weeks ago on Rank the Revival: Moffat Era Recap

Reply

@TazminDaytime  I didn't mean that, but I think that arguing that she's not developed enough so shouldn't return isn't a strong argument, because having her return would (or should) develop her, especially if she was to be a companion. The article has other good branches of it's argument, but I thought that one was weak.

1 month, 3 weeks ago on Why Shona McCullough Should Not Return

Reply

While I have no real inclination to have Shona return, I think this article doesn't take into account the fact that Shona could easily be developed beyond what we saw in Last Christmas. We really only got a glimpse of her personality and subsequent appearances could serve to develop her and show us a side of her unseen in Last Christmas. The same really goes for any one-off character.

We could compare Shona to Donna in this instance, because Donna first appeared in a Christmas special and then went on to become one of the most popular companions and while I'm not a huge Donna fan, she was also very well developed. But her first appearance doesn't give nearly the depth that comes from her later appearances.

Still, I'd rather see a new character become a companion (though I wouldn't be opposed to Faye Marsay returning in some form or another).

1 month, 3 weeks ago on Why Shona McCullough Should Not Return

Reply

In the Forest of the Night is an interesting situation. I don't really like it, but I also don't think it deserves a five. For me a story that leaves me uninterested but isn't particularly "bad" gets a five, and I was actually interested in this episode, so I feel like it's above average. I feel similarly to it as I do to Robot of Sherwood, in that I don't really want to give it a six, but I'm not sure it deserves a 7.

1 month, 3 weeks ago on Rank the Revival: 2014 Part 4

Reply

I really wish that writers had a 45-60 minute time period to work with for episodes. I think a lot of episodes that needed extra time don't necessarily need a second part, but only an extra ten or fifteen minutes. With a flexible time period episodes could find the perfect length of time. I am excited for two-parters to return, but I just want a good story. In my opinion, two-parters have a pretty good track record, so I don't have too much fear about writers padding stories out (though that is a possibility).


I just think it's unfortunate that the amount of time for an episode can't be organic and that a writer has to fit a story to a time period. I suppose it's a necessity for production, but it is unfortunate.

1 month, 3 weeks ago on Moffat Explains Series 9 Two-Parter Increase

Reply

@YaelMoise  Very good point. The issue, I think is that since a series must be planned out so far in advance and there being so little room for changes within the time-limit of a story (the options are basically one parter or two parter, you can't just add in say an extra ten minutes, which is what many episodes need more than a whole second part) that a story kind of needs to be planned out how many episodes it will take up for production reasons, even if this does prevent that kind of organic writing.

Also, I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure that Moffat isn't terribly willing to admit that there have been episodes that needed a two-parter.

1 month, 3 weeks ago on Moffat Explains Series 9 Two-Parter Increase

Reply

@AnEarthlyChild  I'm not sure about The Power of Three. I think it just needed a more thought out ending. Making it a two-parter, I think, would have involved a lot of padding. I wish episodes could get maybe an extra ten or fifteen minutes, because many aren't made for the 45- minute episode or the two-parter.

1 month, 3 weeks ago on Moffat Explains Series 9 Two-Parter Increase

Reply

Deep Breath- 10/10 Wow do I love this episode! And it wasn't just seeing it surrounded by a theatre full of other whovians; it remained just as engrossing when I viewed it again at home.


Into the Dalek- 8/10 I think I respect this episode more than I actually enjoy it. I think the questions about morality it brings up are really interesting, even if I think the episode is a little poorly paced.


Robot of Sherwood- 6/10 I feel bad giving this a 6, but I don't think it really deserved a 7. The plot is a bit nonsensical and it actually isn't particularly funny, aside from one or two jokes (I still chuckle at "It's a good thing Clara didn't see that."). The Doctor and Robin Hood's arguing wasn't funny annoying, it was just annoying and made me really want to yell at them to shut up (I was so thankful when Clara did). Not a bad episode, but not really a good one either. I did like the ideas about stories vs. reality, but the rest not so much.

1 month, 3 weeks ago on Rank the Revival: 2014 Part 1

Reply

I'd like them to play the long game with Gallifrey's return. To have it return in just a series or two feels to quick for me. I feel we should be eased into it with more and more Time Lords escaping. Perhaps the reason for their escape could be that there are some terrible political problems, whether that be a dictatorial government, civil war, etc. The Doctor could eventually be led back to Gallifrey and confront such issues.

1 month, 3 weeks ago on Will Gallifrey Return in Series 9?

Reply

@Aztecs, Daleks and Cavemen @supermoff, defender of Akhaten  My Doctor: Matt Smith

Favorite Doctor: Peter Capaldi


1 month, 4 weeks ago on The Doctor Division

Reply

After Last Christmas, I didn't really get why everyone wanted Shona back. I thought she was funny, but there was nothing that really grabbed me about her, though she did have a lot of potential.

But then I saw Faye Marsay in the film Pride (great movie, by the way) and then I saw an interview with her. Not only does she seem to be a very good actress, but also a really nice person. So, while Shona didn't interest me that much, I'd really like to see Faye Marsay return (this wouldn't be the first time an actress has had another role on the show before becoming a companion). And even if Shona was to return, I think she's got a lot of potential as a character.

2 months ago on Faye Marsay: There’s Been No talk of Shona Returning

Reply

This comes up every time The Girl Who Waited does, but I see people who don't think it's just for Amy to be so annoyed that she waited 50 odd years, while Rory waited two thousand. But here's the thing, Rory always knew that Amy was going to come back. Whereas Amy thought she'd been abandoned forever. Not only that, but Rory (being a plastic auton) didn't age. Amy, however, is human and losing 50 years of her life meant that even if older Amy had been rescued she would have maybe 30 years at most left to live. Rory may have waited longer, but the two waited in very different circumstances.

2 months ago on Rank the Revival: 2011 Part 3

Reply

@Planet of the Deaf @twoheartsonemind (Six Seasons and a Movie) @BLINKANDYOUREDEAD  That's also why I think a second companion would be a good idea to have. That way the story could be used without sacrificing that perspective.

2 months ago on Series 9 Filming: Bah Bah Biker

Reply

@ichabod @twoheartsonemind (Six Seasons and a Movie) @BLINKANDYOUREDEAD  Completely agree. I don't think it should be done for that purpose, but if that's a consequence of it, then that's not necessarily a bad thing. 

2 months ago on Series 9 Filming: Bah Bah Biker

Reply

@BLINKANDYOUREDEAD  If the series goes that route, I'd really like to see a second companion in the TARDIS. They'll be able to see Clara truly become corrupt, whereas the Doctor could be blinded by his love (in a friendship-way, of course) for her. I think that would create some really nice tension.

Also, turning Clara into a really good villain would be a good way to work with the fact that a lot of people don't like her.

2 months ago on Series 9 Filming: Bah Bah Biker

Reply

@Ivegotkidneys   Curse of the Black Spot was the first episode I saw, so it holds a special place in my heart, but I actually really like Night Terrors. It's not my favorite episode, but I think it's pretty solid. So I guess what I'm trying to say is that I love them both equally.

2 months ago on Rank the Revival: 2011 Part 1

Reply

@Edoe  The "They're Americans." line gets me every time!

2 months ago on Rank the Revival: 2011 Part 1

Reply

@ilyootha  Well, this is the series opener, so it's possible that Clara's going to give in her resignation at some point during the story. Perhaps, the series will open with her trying to fit into normal society, but she can't (the few lines between her and the kids seem to indicate this) and will then commit to traveling full time in the TARDIS.

2 months ago on Series 9 Filming: Bah Bah Biker

Reply

This is great. Cornell's a fantastic writer (in any medium) and an accomplished comics writer, so this should be good. Oddly enough, I might be more excited at the prospects of the three companions meeting than the three Doctors.

2 months ago on Paul Cornell Penning Multi-Doctor Story for Titan

Reply

@Ivegotkidneys   That's a really interesting observation. I'm not British (I'm American), so I don't have first hand experience with that class system, but I could definitely see how RTD's era could be more aimed to the working class, especially with Rose. I'm not sure I'd say Moffat's era is more aimed at middle class, but more that it doesn't really look at class at all, whereas I think RTD went out of his way to include it more, though that might be because he focused on the companions families more.

2 months, 1 week ago on The Divide in New Who: One Era to Another

Reply

Really great article.

I don't think the divide is so much the young vs. the old, but rather when you started watching, and even then that's a big generalization. While both eras are unmistakably Doctor Who, there is a different style to both of them and, Doctor Who being such a personal thing, this means that a viewer will associate one style with Doctor Who, before they've even seen the other eras. By the way, those eras can be Doctors and not showrunners.

That's not to say that someone can't like all styles equally or prefer the second era they see to their first, but the idea is that that first era makes a mark on them as that's what Doctor Who "is" and that can be hard to get away from.

2 months, 1 week ago on The Divide in New Who: One Era to Another

Reply

The biggest issue with discussion in the fandom is the idea that someone has a different or unpopular opinion and that this makes them less of a fan. For example, I've seen people say that if you don't like the Rose/Ten pairing you aren't a real fan. Of course, this makes no sense. People often ask for people who don't like an episode/character/showrunner or otherwise to just stop watching or to think of the positives, but really this is just telling someone to censor themselves.

The issue though is that people who do enjoy these things often find themselves surrounded by negative (and often hyperbolic) comments about aspects of the show they love. You can understand their want to defend these things, but sometimes they take it to far and instead it turns into an attack. The point being that both sides can be very aggressive, and often hurtful, in expressing their opinions.

The best solution to this is to take into account that others will feel the exact opposite as you and use your comments to open up the floor for discussion, not to shut it down.

2 months, 1 week ago on Say Something Nice: Internet Fandom

Reply

The Eleventh Hour- 10/10 Perfect way to start the Eleventh Doctors era. Just insanely good.

The Beast Below- 10/10 I really still can't fathom why people dislike this episode; it works on all levels for me.

Victory of the Daleks- 7/10 I also just really like this episode. Maybe it's not the best, but it's hugely entertaining.

Time of the Angels- 9/10

Flesh and Stone 9/10 Great episode. Wonderful pacing, nice side characters, all around really good.


2 months, 1 week ago on Rank the Revival: 2010 Part 1

Reply

@Clara Bosswald wants Spider-Man to die  I'd kind of love to see Clara and Six together. Can you imagine the arguments?

2 months, 1 week ago on What if… Doctors Were Paired With Different Companions?

Reply

Partners In Crime- 5/10 Just not my cup of tea, I guess. I just found it kind of boring.


The Fires of Pompeii- 9/10 I remember missing soccer practice to finish watching this episode. It still holds up today, imaginative and provides an interesting moral dilemma.


Planet of the Ood- 7/10 I feel like I should like this episode more than I did. Entertaining enough.


The Sontaran Strategem- 7/10

The Poison Sky- 7/10 Something with these two episodes just didn't click with me and the Sontarans didn't come off as particularly threatening.

2 months, 1 week ago on Rank the Revival: 2008 Part 1

Reply

@Daleky  Out of curiosity, how many episodes have you given a ten to?

I would think it's difficult to not come up with a single flaw in any episode.

2 months, 1 week ago on Doctor Who and Episode Rankings

Reply

@PaddyB @Notsosmartguy  @Switcharoo   I don't know that it's about something being outright expressed to the viewer, so much as it is flaws impacting the narrative. And they definitely did with Ten; The Waters of Mars being a prime example. I think it just depends on the degree to which you wish for it to be addressed.

2 months, 2 weeks ago on Rank the Revival: 2007 Part 2

Reply

The Lazarus Experiment- 7/10 Very entertaining!

42- 9/10 Superb episode. The fear David Tennant portrays and that we rarely see from the Doctor in this way is a highlight.

Human Nature- 10/10

Family of Blood- 10/10 These two episodes make my favorite Doctor Who story. Perfect in every way, if you ask me.

2 months, 2 weeks ago on Rank the Revival: 2007 Part 2

Reply

@Malohkeh, not a member of any acronyms  I didn't like it on the first viewing, it took me another viewing to really enjoy it and I think that was because I was disappointed that the drug idea in the beginning of the episode wasn't taken further.

I think Gridlock has a very creative idea to begin with, but it takes it further when you think about the government deception of people and how they just hold out hope and do what they're told, even when it really doesn't make sense to. That says a lot about human nature, in my mind.

It's certainly not my favorite episode, but I appreciate the complexity and creativity of it.

2 months, 2 weeks ago on Rank the Revival: 2007 Part 1

Reply

Oh how I love series 3.

Smith and Jones 10/10

The Shakespeare Code 10/10

Gridlock 8/10

Daleks in Manhattan 7/10

Evolution of the Daleks 7/10

2 months, 2 weeks ago on Rank the Revival: 2007 Part 1

Reply

@MrRazza has joined David Dimbleby @twoheartsonemind (Six Seasons and a Movie)  I see what you mean. Sorry about the misinterpretation on my part.

I think Rose was portrayed as flawed when she left her mother at certain points, but not so at others (and not particularly with Mickey). If anything, I find the idea that Rose is flawed inconsistently portrayed, and don't really come to a head in the overall story, as they do with Clara.

Total agreement though about which character gets attacked more for flaws.

2 months, 2 weeks ago on Rank the Revival: 2006 Part 1

Reply

@Alleigh member of P.O.N.D.S  To me though, that's very human. It's something I know that I do and am sure that others do, but is rarely portrayed so straightforwardly in fiction, so to me doing that with Clara is a breath of fresh air and actually makes her more relatable (at least to me).

I do agree that Rose/Ten did come off as incredibly forced.

2 months, 2 weeks ago on Rank the Revival: 2006 Part 1

Reply