Bio not provided
It is evident the Colts plan on finishing with a terrible record again next year, try to trade the big pick they will receive (probably 1-3), and try to start building a team the next year. if they do nothing else, they had better shore up the offensive line big time immediately, or Luck will not last until next year.
As they say, "You play to win the game." Or in the Colts case, maybe not.
1 year, 9 months ago on Colts saved $10M in salary cap | Articles
The more I look at the Mathis signing, the more confused I get You do not sign a guy like Mathis to this kind of a contract if you are rebuilding. Either this front office is totally in disarray or they have a plan that includes winning in 2012. And coincidentially, winning does not include starting a rookie QB.
1 year, 9 months ago on Robert Mathis Re-Signed to Long Term Deal | February
The Colts had better be sure Mathis can fill the role of a stand up OLB, because on a 4-3 he is a real liability aganst the run, and teams will run at him in the 3-4 too.
Agree and disagree. The Colts will contend this next year if Manning is healthy, signs a renegotiated contract, the Colts do the same with Freeney, allowing Wayne and Garcon to return, and the Colts are able to improve the defense. Manning has proved for years that he does not need a great offensive line. If Manning, Wayne and Garcon are here, the Colts will have a top rated offense. Can the Colts improve the defense a little bit?
The biggest problem I see with the Colts bringing back Manning is the Manning offense. I don't know if there is a QB alive that can run this offense effectively but Manning. What are the Colts going to do about the offense? Rely on Manning to be healthy until he retires, and then change the offense to a conventional, offensive coordinator controlled one?
1 year, 9 months ago on The Mythology of Manning | March
Nate, to me the infomation of the last couple of days, the video and Bob Kravitz revelations, serves to substantiate the reporting of Mortensen the last several weeks, in addition to lending credence to the credibility of Bill Polian, who Bob K stated was a "liar" concerning the late December Manning throwing sessions. Evidenty, the "Manning camp" was leakig the truth. Comments?
1 year, 9 months ago on Video Released of Manning Throwing | March
If you watch, you can see Manning immediately reach to his upper right arm, near the shoulder area. Maybe feeling some numbness or burning.
1 year, 9 months ago on Did Gregg William's Illegal Bounty System Help End Peyton Manning's Career in Indianapolis? | March
Nate, I have yet to see your take on Mortensen's latest, which is that Manning is throwing very well, and coinciding with his report, Kravitz saying that he has heard from multiple sources, none from the Manning camp, that Manning is throwing "much, much, better.
1 year, 9 months ago on Covering the AFC South | March
This offense would be near the bottom of the NFL. Maybe the Colts expect the defense to keep them in games?
1 year, 9 months ago on If Kuharsky ran the Colts | Articles
In five years, Irsay may turn out to be a genuis. But right now, this organization has turned into a train wreck. Are any offensive free agents going to want to come here for a while, unless the Colts significantly outbid other teams? If Manning is gone, is any receiver going to want to work with a rookie QB and have no opportunity to win or get stats?
1 year, 9 months ago on King: Wayne/Garçon/Manning package deal? | Articles
There is a misnomer about stopping the pass vs stopping the run A defense has to be able to do one or the other, or at least be able to slow down one if needed. The Colts have been reputed to be a top team against the pass in recent years, but that was false. They were so bad against the run tnat team did not pass a lot against them. They really were not good against the pass, either, letting teams convert third down after third down.
1 year, 9 months ago on Teams Must Think Differently About Football | February
No doubt the Colts are going to rebuild. But they have the rare opportunity to win while doing it, with keeping Manning at a cheaper rate and drafting Luck. They could also rebuild while being mediocre, which will be letting Manning go, and starting Luck from day one. Haven't we heard, "hello, you play to win the game." What will Irsay's choice be? To win or to lose?
1 year, 9 months ago on Saturday says Manning will play in 2012 | Articles
Nate Dunlevy The fallacy about this is, you are using the fact that Mortensen and Shefter reporting this as "new" news as a basis to belittle their reports about Manning's arm strength returning. These guys have many, many more sources than you have ever dreamed of. They wouldn't take something that Manning's people say just at "face value." They would check it out. These guys have reputation's at stake. This is their living. They don't make things up, and don't say things just because a single source tells something to them. What they are saying is consistent with Polian's statements, with Addai's, and with Vinateiri's. Are all of these people not being truthful? Time will tell.
1 year, 9 months ago on Banks Reports Manning had Secret Surgery Last Summer | February
Nate Dunlevy Payton You say a healthy Manning does not exist any more. What are your credentials for making such a claim six or seven months before the season starts? Where did you play your college ball? Were you good at throwing the out? It is your opinion, and worth just a much as my dog's. It may end up right, but just as likely may not.
Nate Dunlevy Sorry, but you are wrong. He was shut down in December the day after the workout because the Colts training staff did not think his neck was strong enough, the muscles had not built up enough. Check it out. Dr. Fuer said in December the neck had atrophied due to inactivity and there was not a full range of motion. The most recent report stated that he could play, if he had sufficient arm strength. He can take a hit now, he could not in December. The same Dr. Fuer stated this time, "If you were my son, I would tell you to play." Therefore, the reports are different, as Dr. Fuer stated he could not play in December because of the neck, and he can play now. You are wrong about this. All that Manning is waiting for now is for the arm to regain sufficient strength. He can take a hit now, he could not in December. Please read the SI article again, and you will see your error.
And also, the latest release was "new" news. 18to88 is using the fact that Chris Mortensen reported is a news to question Mortensen's credibility. After the December workout, Drs (Colts trainders and Drs) stated Manning could not play. The latest report stated he could play. Totally different, and totally new.
Nate Dunlevy Payton Was it true that Manning was going to retire the afternoon of Rob Lowe's tweet? To me, that is what started all of the "politics," and was an underhanded trick by Irsay. And the latest release, that Manning had a "fourth procedure" was another underhanded trick that had no meaning at all. The truth, doctors have released Manning to PLAY football, physically. Whether he can throw the football like the Manning of old is another thing, and he really has several months for the arm to continue to get stronger. As Chris Wienke said, he suffered the same problems Manning did after the fusion. He had zero arm strength, he had to "teach himself to throw all over again, " and he did. That is a journeyman QB who did that, not arguably the best QB of all time. Manning may not make it back, but his history says he will.
Nate Dunlevy Payton Irsay released this info just in another attempt to do what it is indeed doing: casting douts on whether Manning will be able to play, and making it more obvious to all that the Colts should release him. What would be something would be a release, followed by a taped throwing session in mid-March, and a full scale bidding war like we have not seen ever. Seeing Manning carry on somewhere else, breaking all the NFL career passing records in another uniform, and the Colts beginning another run, this one of several years of mediocre play will do wonders for us all. By the way, I am sure that the latest article about the doctors releasing Manning was in response to Irsay and the media (Kravitz) daily planting rumors about Manning's demise: Rob Lowe, etc. Irsay and his minions were in the process of putting the dirt over Manning's grave, and Manning had to make some response.
Nate Dunlevy I am not mad at the Colts. I am mad a Irsay for all his schneggians. There is no way I would pay the 28 million, but I would have done all in my power to sign a player who has increased the value of this franchise tremendously all by himself, and made me tens of millions of dollars. Irsay sent the first broadside thru his buddy, Rob Lowe, and other subtle references have followed, all in a public relations attempt. I have lost all respect for Irsay, and that won't return no matter what happens. However, I doubt he is worrying about it.
You really want me, but you want me only if I cut my salary. You really want me, but you want to gut the team so I can't help us win. You really want me, but you are going to bring in my replacement. No thanks!
Nate Dunlevy The Colts franchised Manning, so they were in "hock" to him for $23 million before the 2-4th procedures. Injuries happen, so the Colts paid him as all NFL teams do to players who get injured. They Colts did not do Manning any favors by signing him to the contract as it was written, as they had the out this March. They owed him $23 million anyway. People who say the Colts made a good will move to Manning by signing him don't know what they are talking about.