Bio not provided
@ClayAlexander I already do!
1 year ago on Navy SEALs Ordered To Remove Navy Jack From Uniforms
@navydoc1968 I wasn’t Navy I was Army but I agree with you. They seem to have joined the no balls club.
@CharlesSinclair Any time it is necessary to rebel it is smart to pick the (your) time and topic to make a move this patch is not it. The potus will hang himself if we just give him the time. He is getting desperate. I suggest no move on this one.
@ScottCollier1 @sgtstriker @jimbritttn @Afghanistan @gsmack That's the oath we all took my friends. It has no expiration date. I shall live up to mine even though its been 40 years ago.
@jimbritttn I don’t think that’s the way to fight him. Use your head!
Why do you guys keep debating this idiot. It is obvious he just makes things up to harass you. Saying he is an idiot may be an understatement.
1 year, 4 months ago on Zimmerman May Not Be Racist, But America Is
@chamuiel That is the ground and pound
@Frank Zappa @tygerpaw25 and hung -- say and hung!
Do you ignore facts on purpose or does ignorance just come natural to you? Get your facts straight then post a comparison on Marissa.
He pursued no one. He followed him which he had every right to do as a matter of fact he had an obligation to follow him to see where he was going and/or what he was up to. He was a block watch leader. He also did not start the fight and was returning to his vehicle when he was attacked. These are the facts that came out during the trial. Like it or not. Furthermore, TM hit GZ knocked him down and did the act referred to as ground and pound. GZ feared for his life at that point and pulled his weapon and shot him after he shouted for help several times. You may perceive these facts differently that’s your right but you perception does not make them correct. Furthermore, you are entitled to you own opinion but not your own facts. GZ was found not guilty, get over it!
Your attempt to impress was not successful. You’re using distorted facts. The fact is TM attacked GZ. Furthermore GZ had every right to do exactly what he was doing watching someone he had never seen before in the neighborhood who was acting suspicious on a dark rainy night not especially a night for a leisurely walk around the block. Race had absolutely nothing to do with it. Someone attacks me the same way and I’m carrying and I usually am he dies just like TM. I don’t care what color he is just as GZ did not take color into account.
Totally agree except I do not think GZ over reacted. If someone attacks me and I’m armed, and I usually am, under the same circumstances there would, no doubt, be the same outcome. So I think it was justified homicide
Randy I think you got it right!
1 year, 4 months ago on Even if George Zimmerman is Guilty, He Should Probably Walk
Ok, you had your say now explain, if you would, why I should care if they burn their own homes and kill each other and loot like they did in mid 60's. All that does is cause them more problems instead of trying to solve their problems .
You jump to conclusions saying I don’t like blacks. You don’t even know me and I support their cause when it is logical and reasonable. Rioting and threatening to murder Zimmerman is neither logical or reasonable. What I don’t support or like is ignorant people who would riot, burn and loot, if they don’t get their way like a spoiled kid. The problem that causes the riot is just an excuse in nearly all cases.
I guess what your saying is if GZ is found guilty it would be logical and reasonable for Mexicans or perhaps whites (since he was considered white to start with) to riot, is that right? If one is correct so is the other! Perhaps someday you will become intelligent enough to be able to see both sides and begin to reason.
1 year, 5 months ago on Even if George Zimmerman is Guilty, He Should Probably Walk
What exactly do you mean "almost" don’t blame them? Does that mean you support someone murdering GZ for defending himself? If so you are worse then ignorant. Personally I don’t care if these N----rs riot in their own neighborhoods and burn their own homes or even kill each other. If they come into my neighborhood threaten me, my family or property, there will be more then one laying dead here. Oh, they may get me but not without a fight that some of them will regret, perhaps for eternity.
Gated communities give the appearance of being secure, they’re not. Gun free zones give a false feeling of being secure, they’re not. I once lived in a gated community while waiting for my house to be built, I had two automobiles stolen and another broken into and the contents stolen. Gated communities are not secure. Without patrols and guards at the gates, even then it is not a system that cannot be breached. It is just like everything else when it comes to security it depends on only one person YOU.
There is a lesson here which only a few seem to get according to the statements here. If someone is not able to control their emotions and therefore, becomes physically aggressive in a state where concealed carry is legal and either with their actions or words threatens another’s life or with bodily injury they should realize what happened to TM can and may happen to many more. This "ain’t rocket science." An armed society is an equal society and is by necessity a polite society. The ones who are not polite get weeded out, sometimes the hard way the way TM did sometimes they just learn, which is the easy way. In any case it does appear TM got what he deserved and GZ should never have been charged. Anyone who does not understand what their actions may produce should be more passive in their confrontations. TM "was" an ignorant punk crook but he is no longer a drain on society. Furthermore, race has nothing to do with it, so you ignorant folks who are trying to make it raciest have some lessons to learn as well. The question is will it be the hard way or the easy way?
What is a law person? I worked law enforcement just under ten years. The person he spoke to was a dispatcher. No authority what so ever. Cannot tell him what to do can only suggest or recommend. However, according to the actual report GZ did stop following him and start to return to his vehicle. That is when TM attacked him. Had I been in the shoes of GZ I would have done exactly the same thing.
Your right but if you think any of them will listen to you your also wrong.
I suspect Martin saw Zimmerman’s return to his car as a retreat or weakness and that is why he attacked. Perhaps he interpreted it as fear. If he had attacked me I would have done the same thing. Zimmerman had both a purpose and a reason for being there and being suspicious of Martin.
Any time someone attacks you you have reason to fear personal harm. Furthermore, it can be seen as a threat on you life. By protecting yourself you are breaking no law. That is why guns are necessary it was the equalizer in this case. All men are created equal Samuel Colt keeps them that way! Martin had no reason to attack Zimmerman other then the fact he was a bully and hated crackers. Consequently, if the blacks want it to be raciest we can make it that way.
That makes two of us!
I suspect that is correct. The reason he was not arrested for 44 days is it was obviously self defense. The only reason he was arrested was politics. The same time this went down over 150 people were murdered, black on black in south side Chicago. No word about that in the lame stream media.
If the blacks riot because Zimmerman is acquitted they will prove nothing but their ignorance. If they want a war bring it on, no uniforms will be necessary. The current administration has set race relations back to the civil war era. That’s to bad because some are exceptional people.
All the evidence to date leads to Zimmerman acting in self defense just as he says. Declaring Martin innocence because he is black is just as wrong as declaring him guilty because he is black. In any case he has paid a price for his aggressive actions and he should have. In this case it does appear justice will be served. Just because it goes against what you would like to see happen does not mean Zimmerman is guilty if anything. Facts are facts. Right is right. If you can prove otherwise come forrard and testify under oath. Otherwise you opinion is just that an opinion and means nothing. Zimmerman had just as much right to be out walking around that night as did Martin. If you are only capable of seeing one side you are a part of the problem we currently have in the US. Racism is racism regardless weather black or white, red or orange.
After Reagan screwed up in 86 and did not follow up and be sure the border was actually closed like it was supposed to be. He actually made the statement later on that that was his biggest mistake. His predecessor also refused to close it, I suspect because he supported the NWO. Slick Willie paid it no mind and no one put any pressure on him to close it, at least to any degree. Then GW came along and he refused to close it and was willing to give amnesty to as many as thirty million illegal’s. While the progressives made their case that it was impossible to deport thirty million illegal aliens. Now suddenly there is only eleven million here when they want amnesty for them. Therefore, I guess 19 million hot footed it back over the border? Bull puky.
In any case no one in the media is asking the one question I would like to ask these jerks in power. That is "why do you not went to close the southern border"? What benefit do you see in keeping it open?
Every president since Reagan has not wanted to close the border and no one seems to know why. Why is that? I would like to know why, would you?
1 year, 5 months ago on Marco Rubio: Securing The Border Is Now Secondary To Citizenship
1 year, 5 months ago on Why "Gun Free Zones" Actually Endanger Our Lives
1 year, 5 months ago on School Districts Tells Christians to Shut Up!
Tell me where or better yet show me where within the constitution there is a reference to "separation of church and state." I cannot find it.
Look lets get one thing straight the only way a bill any bill will ever pass the House is if the border is closed first. Period!! Take that to the bank. It is not because conservatives don’t like Mexicans. I’m conservative and I raised a legal Mexican boy. When I lived in Douglas Arizona I had many Mexican friends. However, the liberal progressives will spread the false word we do not like Mexicans. Let me remind anyone caught up in this trap. Here in Arizona, I can’t speak for any other state, we found more then one prayer rug left in the dessert. This is proof these muslims are also coming across the border. Like I said before they ain’t coming over here to wish us merry Christmas, their intentions are not good so all you liberal progressives who want to see Sharia law here in the US, F---U. You may have the ignorant people behind you now but they’re the only ones.
Interesting, the muslims hate the liberal progressives just as much as those of us who are conservatives. In their eyes we are all infidels targeted for killing. They also target the gays, atheists and all other religions. Have a nice day idiots!
So are you insinuating I said he was a liberal idiot? Read it again.
1 year, 5 months ago on Veteran Charged With Unlawful Gun Use After Defending Himself Against Intruder
My experience has been that people who make stupid statements (like this) and then say I was just kidding or that is my way of being sarcastic really means the statement and both are lies. Who can say if Frank Camp really means this or not? Therefore isn’t it better to make you point realistically and not try sarcasms. What fence is he really attempting to straddle.
Perhaps it seems so far out of reasonable he, Frank Camp, is under the impression everyone will see his point. Many responding here did not see it however, so if he is going to blog. to make a point he may want to be more specific and to the point. The extreme climate of today dictates truthfulness, honesty, and forthrightness. Since we do seem to be surrounded with lies and excuses constantly by nearly everyone in government. Perhaps prior to obama’s constant lies this point would have been realized much easier, now however, that is not true.
McCain is a progressive Republican frankly I do not consider him a conservative. Furthermore, I firmly believe progressivism is communism in disguise. I do find however, there seems to be degrees of their progressivism, for instance Lindsey Graham is also a progressive but not quite as bad as McCain.
1 year, 6 months ago on Ted Cruz: "I Don't Trust Republicans."
We currently have two people who I consider extremely honest and trustworthy. Namely Ted Cruz and Rand Paul. These are the kind of people you want on your side. Truthfulness, honestly, knowledge and trustworthiness are the things that really count in the precarious situation we find ourselves in today. These are the kind of people that can and will cure our ills if given the chance. They are not Republicans or Democrats their Americans. I like that!
Beware of anyone from the government in a high position who says trust me on this. Only a fool would. Especially this president. It would be difficult to quote any statement where he has not lied. How does anyone trust a liar who is grabbing power and becoming a dictator. When obama first took office I recalled a statement by Reagan regarding Russia where he said "trust but verify." That statement has never been truer then with this current government! However, it should be changed just slightly to "if you trust verify immediately."
1 year, 6 months ago on Obama Urges Grads to Ignore Tyranny Warnings
I’m right there with you. I too am a Christian, however, if there is any forgiving of this person it will have to be by God. No earthly Christian can forgive some human (if he is human) who has committed the acts he has. Anyone who watched Beck today knows exactly what I’m saying.
1 year, 7 months ago on Grand Jury: Abortionist Murdered ‘Hundreds’ of Children; M.E.: Adam Lanza Murdered 20
I have known of no one if my 74 years that deserved the same fate as those whose life was ended by this sub-human.
@MYS77 Obama's saving them for us!
1 year, 7 months ago on North Korea: Nuke Strike on U.S. “Today or Tomorrow”
I cannot speak for any others however, I was a Free Mason I have never know even one person who had any desires to control or overthrow anything that was a Free Mason. I knew no one who presented any type of subterfuge of any kind. Perhaps you watch to much main stream television. Furthermore, I’m not much of a Rupert Murdock fan and he may be a communist but he does own at least some media outlets (Fox and The Wall Street Journal come immediately to mind) that make an attempt at the truth . With so much misinformation out there today it is sometimes difficult to separate the wheat from the chaff. There is however, one thing that should be obvious to everyone MSNBC, ABC, CBS and some of the others including PBS are shaded communist or at least anti free enterprise. Wealth redistribution in itself is anti free enterprise. However, I do not think Murdock has any influence there. MSNBC even has some of its commentators who publically proclaim their socialistic communist leanings. If you really wish the truth perhaps you should start spending some time gleaning from the BLAZE. At least it would give you a reference to compare the others to.
You are correct and yes I have. If my memory serves me right I think Charleston Heston had two 50's.
1 year, 9 months ago on Missouri Democrats Introduce Bill to Confiscate Assault Weapons in 90 Days
Dave you have every right to live anywhere you desire. I however, would never live somewhere that was so restrictive as to my rights to keep and bear arms. Here in Arizona we have the right to carry concealed or open under the second amendment, no permit of any kind required. And no it is not the wild wild west, never has been never will be. That was just in the movies for the benefit of the producers. You can even carry in a bar as long as you do not drink, if you do you must check the gun. Pick it up when you leave. I’ve done that many times.
Oh, one more thing not very many people blow their horn here like in NYC or flip people off or even swear at them. We’re a little more polite, if you understand.
I also hope and pray this crises does not go that far. However, if this government pushes this it will come to that. We must not under any circumstances give up our guns, if we do both we and this nation are dead! The only chance we have of surviving is keeping our guns. If that were not true they, the government, would not want to confiscate them. Be suspicions very suspicious of government.
At the first sign of confiscation we must hide or bury them along with the ammunition. Make plans now when it starts it will be to late.
1 year, 9 months ago on AK-47s, AR-15s, Police and You
You may be right both literally and figuratively.
Where are they in Arizona? I will check it out.
The SCOTUS ruled law enforcement has no legal requirement to protect citizens. It further noted it could not be sued for not protecting citizens. Consequently, it is up to the individual to provide their own self protection. However, think about this, if you rely on someone else to protect you, even if they had the legal obligation to, and they are not available or do not show up in time who is it that gets hurt? You or the law enforcement officer that is unable to respond? Do you now see why it is necessary you prepare to protect yourself. Do you now have any knowledge why a fire arm may be necessary?
One other question, were any of the Jews or regular citizens in Germany under hitler able to protect themselves? How about Russia under Stalin, China under Mao. Or any of the other dozens of countries that murdered their citizens during the 20th century to the tune of over 170 million? Do you think that could ever happen here? Do you think any of those 170 million thought without their guns their government would murder them?
What many liberal progressives (I am not necessarily insinuating you are liberal progressive) do not seem to understand or refuse to understand or admit, its not just the criminal who desires to massacre citizens that we need to protect against. It is tyrannical government as well. Power corrupts absolute power corrupts absolutely. The number of citizens mass murdered by governments far exceed what the nut jobs succeed in doing.
1 year, 9 months ago on Police NOT Obligated to Protect Citizens
I, as you, have considered the repeal of the 26th amendment in hopes of a more calm and sane election of our leaders.
I, unlike you however, do not trust the polls in the determination you made. I do not see the youth becoming more pro-life. I do see the younger generation becoming more receptive to gay and lesbian choice.
Regarding abortion, the congress was given the avenue to get Roe vs Wade repealed when it was determined legal to abort babies and that was in making the determination of when life begins. Just as the supreme court determined the healthcare bill was legal because the fine was a tax and they had the right to tax, the supreme court could not or would not declare abortion illegal because when life began was not determined. So when abortion took a life was not determined. Congress could correct the wrong if they passed a law making that determination. So far they have refused to do so.
1 year, 9 months ago on Tide is Turning in Abortion Debate—Liberals Run Scared : The Last Resistance
Once again this is a demonstration of the fact that it is impossible to reason with an unreasonable person. Many, or perhaps more accurately most, of the old time Democrats I knew were gun owners and not progressive, just as were the conservatives both Republicans and Independents. However, when progressivism was openly declared by Hillary Clinton during the presidential debates in 2008, and later when John McCain declared he most admired the person credited with starting progressivism in America, Teddy Roosevelt, progressives came out of hiding. Not all Democrats are progressives and in my opinion progressivism is communism in disguise. When communist were being exposed by congress they became progressives. At that time a more acceptable term. Every nation that has ever been taken over by a tyrannical government such as socialistic communism, marxism or fascism was, to some degree, progressive and first confiscated the guns from the citizens. After taking the weapons out of the hands of the citizens the land was confiscated and the helpless citizens murdered in many different ways. If you have not yet seen innocence betrayed I suggest you go here and watch this very accurate precise documentary.
Even many of those who had supported Hitler’s rise to power were later murdered by his henchmen (Brown shirts and SS troops). These types of things happen everywhere tyranny raises its ugly head. In each case the majority of the citizens did not see it coming. No one ever wants to admit "their" government would do such a thing. However, they will and so will this one if they are successful at the confiscation of the means of the citizens defending their self against tyrannical government. We must never succumb to a tyrannical government and give up our weapons. If we do not only are we dead so is this nation.
In this case I was speaking to you wacky!
1 year, 9 months ago on In Chicago, Land of Liberal Gun Control, 911 is Made Impotent
So tell me does being an idiot come natural to you or did you have to practice?