Bio not provided
@John at MrSEC @schwin97
So ESPN has started snooping around Manziel getting paid for autographs because the NCAA was investigating it - makes sense... So Rovell has been investigating, and due to the investigation he comes to the conclusion that, "...all brokers pay. (tweet from Rovell on Aug 12)" So if that is his conclusion, why doesn't he work on that part of the story at all with all the other items on the market? I understand that most likely none of the brokers will say anything about those other athletes, but doesn't that then lead to question why Manziel??? If these brokers won't talk about any other athlete, and he believes every broker pays, why will they say Manizel's name, but no other name? This is what lends me to believe he has an agenda that isn't investigative reporting, but more sensationalized reporting.
Many thanks for the site - great information to be found here.
3 months, 2 weeks ago on Texas A&M Chancellor Not Happy With ESPN’s Rovell
I thnk the problem many of us Aggies have is that the reporting seems very one-sided. You have them report about Manziel, but nothing about the people who supposedly paid him? You also have them report about Manziel, but I don't remember seeing any investigative reporting on the other athletes that have similar 'proof' that they have been paid for autographs? People say he brought this on himself, but what did he do to bring this on himself? The only thing he has done all summer that should be considered bad is getting asked to leave the Manning's academy.
Just teasing us with the Ken Bradley mystery article??? :)
4 months, 2 weeks ago on SEC Headlines 7/29/2013