Livefyre Profile

Activity Stream

@Wayne88 @johnwtobin  Without the 2nd Amendment it is doubtful there would be due process in this country (except that which is defined by the state). 

6 days, 13 hours ago on Look at this amazing pic from the Nevada Range War, Looks like a western “showdown” Citizens vs. Feds.

Reply

@stevelemois  When he engaged his fingers, he forgot the most important part; Engage brain first!!!

1 week, 2 days ago on Look at this amazing pic from the Nevada Range War, Looks like a western “showdown” Citizens vs. Feds.

Reply

So, is it "federal" property, or "public" property? Did the State of Nevada cede or sell any of that property to the United States as per Art. 1, Sec.8, Cl. 17 of the federal Constitution?

1 week, 2 days ago on Look at this amazing pic from the Nevada Range War, Looks like a western “showdown” Citizens vs. Feds.

Reply

Do you believe that these brave people are only standing up for this one incident? The majority of these People are the same People who fight for this Country and against tyranny every day. 

The lll%'ers, the Oath Keepers and many other people and groups. 
Those who do not listen will not hear. Those who do not look will not find. 

How about you? What do you do?

1 week, 3 days ago on Look at this amazing pic from the Nevada Range War, Looks like a western “showdown” Citizens vs. Feds.

Reply

No way would that money go the "the taxpayer". It would just go to the foreign federal government and it's foreign banking masters. But as a someone who believes that the federal government is sovereign in all things, I doubt if you would be able to understand that. 

1 week, 3 days ago on Look at this amazing pic from the Nevada Range War, Looks like a western “showdown” Citizens vs. Feds.

Reply

And if that happens, do you think the federal government will give the land back to the Indians? 

1 week, 3 days ago on Look at this amazing pic from the Nevada Range War, Looks like a western “showdown” Citizens vs. Feds.

Reply

@The Woz  Goofy site!! Pop-up told me I couldn't post the way I did. Xed out and tried it a different way. Came back it was blank. Tried again, same thing. Xed out. Went to a different article. Came back. Now it looks like both posts are here! Goofy site! :-/

1 week, 3 days ago on Look at this amazing pic from the Nevada Range War, Looks like a western “showdown” Citizens vs. Feds.

Reply

@The Woz  


'All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803)"When rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491."An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442  "The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in realty no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it."16 Am Jur 2"^ Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256

1 week, 3 days ago on Look at this amazing pic from the Nevada Range War, Looks like a western “showdown” Citizens vs. Feds.

Reply

@The Woz  The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for a law, which violates the Constitution to be valid. This is succinctly stated as follows: 

1 week, 3 days ago on Look at this amazing pic from the Nevada Range War, Looks like a western “showdown” Citizens vs. Feds.

Reply

@The Woz  The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for a law, which violates the Constitution to be valid. This is succinctly stated as follows: 

'All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803)"When rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491."An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed." Norton vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442  "The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in realty no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it."16 Am Jur 2"^ Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256


1 week, 3 days ago on Look at this amazing pic from the Nevada Range War, Looks like a western “showdown” Citizens vs. Feds.

Reply

We have not had courts of law since at least 1933, maby long befor that. What we have now are maritime law or UCC (Uniform Commercial Code) courts. Note the gold fringe on the flags. It is not just to make them look pretty. 


"In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way."

Franklin D. Roosevelt



1 week, 3 days ago on Look at this amazing pic from the Nevada Range War, Looks like a western “showdown” Citizens vs. Feds.

Reply

@Skeeter38  I wonder how many people do not even know that each State HAS its own  Constitution!!

1 week, 3 days ago on Look at this amazing pic from the Nevada Range War, Looks like a western “showdown” Citizens vs. Feds.

Reply

Many of us can't believe it didn't happen long before now!!

1 week, 3 days ago on Look at this amazing pic from the Nevada Range War, Looks like a western “showdown” Citizens vs. Feds.

Reply

Which supreme Court ruling made the "state" sovereign? And what is it sovereign over?

According to the Constitution the federal government has no powers beyond Article 1, Section 8. And as far as the Several States of the Union go, the state (federal government, of which the supreme Court is part of) has no legislative authority beyond clause 17 (Art. 1, Sec. 8). 

You might also want to read Articles 9 and 10 of the Bill of Rights. And reading the Federalist Papers AND the Anti Federalist Papers might be a good thing for you to do too.

1 week, 3 days ago on Look at this amazing pic from the Nevada Range War, Looks like a western “showdown” Citizens vs. Feds.

Reply